Hilary claims :"we cannot win this war." Is that so?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- We could have won in Korea with nuclear weapons, but liberals panicked the administration, claiming Russia would nuke us if we nuked Korea. The result: 33,000 yanks died, nukes stood idle, the war was a stalemate, and now Korea comes back with its own nukes, threatening us with them, which never would have happened had we nuked them when we had the chance. REAL REAL SMART. And here we sit like fools, as Iran and the rest of the Islamic gangs buy red mercury from the Russian mafia to make their own. Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? What kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We've been fighting in Iraq for years. Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction? Where is Osama?
2 :
The fact that you repeatedly assert your opinion with the sarcastic follow up, "REAL SMART," and in the same sentence recommend the unreserved use of nuclear weapons against other nations destroys every ounce of whatever credibility you would otherwise have. If you think we can just conquer any dissentor with nuclear weapons without any retaliation, then you have some serious cognitive deficits regarding cause and effect. "Let's nuke them so that they can't nuke us!" Yeah. Real(ly) smart. We are not Ancient Rome, but we will fall as they did if we believe we really can weild the same power. Get a clue.
3 :
You can't possibly suggest that just because our "enemies" are evil barbarians that stop at nothing to dissuade us that somehow we should use their tactics? America is a leading country in human rights, that is something I am proud of. We can defeat the enemy while applying human rights, it will make it more difficult, but challenge is what makes us American. America is good because it is great. Once it stops being good, it will stop being great.
4 :
Yes. Korea, Vietnam. Soviet's war in Afganistan. Some people never learnt.
5 :
Do you always fight a war in the enemies backyard? Are you at war with all of the 3 billion muslums in the world? Or just the terrorists?
6 :
We can win it, but with the goverment, NO. Well..........I say we jsut bomb Iraq and Iran. If there are really innocent people, they should have left. Who wouldnt leave? If ur an innocent person in Iraq/Iran then you are STUPID. LEAVE.
7 :
i agree, i think hillary, bill, and bush should be locked in iran while we drop a hellfire brigade of nukes on the whole dang country! and all of its' dang mslims! shoot them all! bush is the devil! and if u r reading this i want u to take a moment os silence (as i am doing now) for people in the war cause of bush! he needs to be put in the guillotine!
8 :
The war was lost right after the invasion. No occupation plan. No good way out except to cut our losses and come home.
9 :
first of all my fellow American. you have to realize that no one has ever really won a war. its not possible to be victorious when so many people, whether they are American or the other, loose their lives over the idiots that represent our nations. yes, me might deplete their armies to point of submission but you can never change those people way of thinking. you mention vietnam. we had nothing to do with that. it was a civil war among that country. pearl harbor was a justified retaliation on japan for attacking us. All through your question, you mentioned "nukes" 15 times. If we shoot nukes, everybody is going to shoot nukes. dont think that these countrys are without nuclear arms just because the UN didnt find any or said to stop all nuclear production. Seems like you're looking for the end of the world to start by the very country you love so much. And Hilary is right. we cant win this war. it needs to come to an end. let no more of our troops die for one man's greed.
10 :
Are we winning now? Looks like she's right.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Are we fools or just plan idiots
Are we fools or just plan idiots?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
History - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We're not fools enough to tell the difference between a question and a rant.
2 :
Uhhhh, what? Please relax.The world is going to be here when you wake up tomorrow. Have some warm milk or an Ambien and go to bed.
3 :
Are you comparing Pearl Harbor and 9/11 here. I wouldn't say we sat around, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating. We fought a just and decisive war. I agree that we should actively pursue Al Queda and those that harbor them. But Al Queda is not a sovereign nation with territory we can invade so it's difficult to nuke them without risking war. I believe the situation calls for a little more tact than you or the current administration are calling for. Perhaps it is best left to the CIA, MI6, and black ops but of course we cannot allow state sponsored assassination. I don't believe the policy of invading countries where we suspect Al Queda activity is working very well. Afghanistan yes, we knew they were there, Iraq certainly not. We don't have troops for future ventures and our presence seems to irritate people. We need a better plan.
4 :
The purpose of the war in Iraq was to get rid of Saddam Husseuins' regime, which it did. it was not a war against the whole of iraq, which makes it a rather more complex affair than the war with Japan. The civil war that has erupted in Iraq is a terrible thing, but America is not at war with the whole country, or at least isn't supposed to be, so you can't start nuking them. The American and British forces in iraq are supoposed to be supportin the current Iraqui government, so how on earth can they start nuking Iraq without killing their allies a swell as their enemies?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
History - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We're not fools enough to tell the difference between a question and a rant.
2 :
Uhhhh, what? Please relax.The world is going to be here when you wake up tomorrow. Have some warm milk or an Ambien and go to bed.
3 :
Are you comparing Pearl Harbor and 9/11 here. I wouldn't say we sat around, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating. We fought a just and decisive war. I agree that we should actively pursue Al Queda and those that harbor them. But Al Queda is not a sovereign nation with territory we can invade so it's difficult to nuke them without risking war. I believe the situation calls for a little more tact than you or the current administration are calling for. Perhaps it is best left to the CIA, MI6, and black ops but of course we cannot allow state sponsored assassination. I don't believe the policy of invading countries where we suspect Al Queda activity is working very well. Afghanistan yes, we knew they were there, Iraq certainly not. We don't have troops for future ventures and our presence seems to irritate people. We need a better plan.
4 :
The purpose of the war in Iraq was to get rid of Saddam Husseuins' regime, which it did. it was not a war against the whole of iraq, which makes it a rather more complex affair than the war with Japan. The civil war that has erupted in Iraq is a terrible thing, but America is not at war with the whole country, or at least isn't supposed to be, so you can't start nuking them. The American and British forces in iraq are supoposed to be supportin the current Iraqui government, so how on earth can they start nuking Iraq without killing their allies a swell as their enemies?
Thursday, July 7, 2011
how to save money on a eurotrip
how to save money on a eurotrip?
so next summer, i'd love to go to europe with my dad for 3-4 weeks, specifically to french-speaking regions so i can practice my french (corsica, monaco, france, belgium, luxembourg, switzerland, etc.) and maybe even stop in london for a couple days for the olympics (although, please excuse my ignorance, i have noo idea how that works). i have relatives who live in la rochelle, france, and an exchange student who lives in bordeaux who we could stay with, but other than that, how can we save money? i'm thinking the hotel rooms and transportation are really going to make it expensive. any ideas?
Packing & Preparation - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Don't be too lavish. Please spend money for necessary things.
2 :
dont spend too much. budget your daily expense
3 :
Europe is generally very expensive you need to be basic about certain things try not spending too much on the hotel as most of the time you will be out shopping or sight seeing and just going to the hotel to sleep (i presume) secondly try to choose joints for eating that are affordable as good as the restaurants look from outside they may not have value for money so you can actually enter a supermarket and grab a decent bite for one meal and the other meal you can pop by in a near by cafe every second shop is either a restaurant or cafe so you will get an idea where you can grab a bite from thirdly try and book your train tickets and air tickets in advance to get the cheap fares esp for the trains thalys and eurostar have offers for early bookings and the rides are very very smooth all the best and enjoy yourself
4 :
I assume you are not European, if so, you will be able to get an Eurail pass, not an InterRail. The man in seat sixty-one has a good site with lots of information for you: http://www.seat61.com/ You 'should' read the page on France, the page on rail passes and maybe just roam around the site to see if there is something else you like to see. On the France page, (click on France in the bar on the left) you will see 'how to buy tickets' in the heading of the page, and How to travel from the UK to France, that info is as good for you as for people who start out in England. If you do decide for a rail pass, it is likely that a 3 countries Eurail Switzerland, France and Benelux will do. The UK is never included. Booking all your train travels early is likely cheaper but less flexible. On the French railway site you can book for all TGV trains as well as the Thalys and Eurostar, that are the high speed trains, and booking early you can save 50 to 90% of the price of tickets bought on the day of traveling. For cheap places to stay use one of the hostel booking sites, they also do cheap hotels and bed and breakfast kind of places. If you do not mind sharing a room with your dad you will often find hotels as cheap as two beds in a dorm in a hostel, but sometimes you will pay less when you go to hostels. France is a country to eat out, but hostels will allow you to do (part of) your own cooking. Cooked lunches in restaurants are often way cheaper than dinners, so if you want to eat out and still want to save money, go out for lunch and cook your own dinner. If you want to see some of the top games of the Olympics, you will have to apply for your tickets very soon, but often there will be sports that have games with tickets for sale when it is almost time for start.
5 :
Bonjour. Cheap Hotels: Formule 1, B'nB (Bed and Breakfast, that is the name of the hotels company) Cheap supermaket: Aldi, Lidl, Leader Price, Netto, Ed Transports: City bus and subway aren't expensive. Trains prices are decent. Plane: forget it! All of that is for France only (but you can find some of these companies over Europe).
so next summer, i'd love to go to europe with my dad for 3-4 weeks, specifically to french-speaking regions so i can practice my french (corsica, monaco, france, belgium, luxembourg, switzerland, etc.) and maybe even stop in london for a couple days for the olympics (although, please excuse my ignorance, i have noo idea how that works). i have relatives who live in la rochelle, france, and an exchange student who lives in bordeaux who we could stay with, but other than that, how can we save money? i'm thinking the hotel rooms and transportation are really going to make it expensive. any ideas?
Packing & Preparation - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Don't be too lavish. Please spend money for necessary things.
2 :
dont spend too much. budget your daily expense
3 :
Europe is generally very expensive you need to be basic about certain things try not spending too much on the hotel as most of the time you will be out shopping or sight seeing and just going to the hotel to sleep (i presume) secondly try to choose joints for eating that are affordable as good as the restaurants look from outside they may not have value for money so you can actually enter a supermarket and grab a decent bite for one meal and the other meal you can pop by in a near by cafe every second shop is either a restaurant or cafe so you will get an idea where you can grab a bite from thirdly try and book your train tickets and air tickets in advance to get the cheap fares esp for the trains thalys and eurostar have offers for early bookings and the rides are very very smooth all the best and enjoy yourself
4 :
I assume you are not European, if so, you will be able to get an Eurail pass, not an InterRail. The man in seat sixty-one has a good site with lots of information for you: http://www.seat61.com/ You 'should' read the page on France, the page on rail passes and maybe just roam around the site to see if there is something else you like to see. On the France page, (click on France in the bar on the left) you will see 'how to buy tickets' in the heading of the page, and How to travel from the UK to France, that info is as good for you as for people who start out in England. If you do decide for a rail pass, it is likely that a 3 countries Eurail Switzerland, France and Benelux will do. The UK is never included. Booking all your train travels early is likely cheaper but less flexible. On the French railway site you can book for all TGV trains as well as the Thalys and Eurostar, that are the high speed trains, and booking early you can save 50 to 90% of the price of tickets bought on the day of traveling. For cheap places to stay use one of the hostel booking sites, they also do cheap hotels and bed and breakfast kind of places. If you do not mind sharing a room with your dad you will often find hotels as cheap as two beds in a dorm in a hostel, but sometimes you will pay less when you go to hostels. France is a country to eat out, but hostels will allow you to do (part of) your own cooking. Cooked lunches in restaurants are often way cheaper than dinners, so if you want to eat out and still want to save money, go out for lunch and cook your own dinner. If you want to see some of the top games of the Olympics, you will have to apply for your tickets very soon, but often there will be sports that have games with tickets for sale when it is almost time for start.
5 :
Bonjour. Cheap Hotels: Formule 1, B'nB (Bed and Breakfast, that is the name of the hotels company) Cheap supermaket: Aldi, Lidl, Leader Price, Netto, Ed Transports: City bus and subway aren't expensive. Trains prices are decent. Plane: forget it! All of that is for France only (but you can find some of these companies over Europe).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)