Should we nuke N Korea now or await another Pearl Harbor and 9/11 before we wake up and act?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Nuke N. Korea? I think not. Exploding nuclear weapons on this planet where we have to live is not sensible. They are a last resort weapon. We can control N Korea if we have to. We could shoot down their missiles and we should shoot down the next long range missile. We can and should use tactical weapons on Iran's nuclear facilities. Should have done it long ago. Now since we don't have a military president we will do nothing until it is too late and we may be forced to defend ourselves with nuclear weapons.. I am against using nukes except as a last resort..
2 :
No, the US shouldn't nuke North Korea. South Korea is an ally of the US and irradiating your allies is generally considered poor form. Plus, the Chinese might get a little grumpy if the US makes the bits of China that border North Korea glow in the dark for the next 10,000 years. Bombing the snot out of them with conventional weapons makes sense, nuking them is just retarded.
3 :
yes. the United States should invade North Korea.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Monday, February 14, 2011
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another pearl harbor or 9/11
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another pearl harbor or 9/11?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should wait for some one to nuke you like you did to the Japanese , some one to invade you like you invaded Iraq, and someone to conquer your land like you did to the red indians.
2 :
Dude, who'se gonna read this giant post. Plus, if we "nuke" them, there will be consequential nuclear fallout in countries that are our allies. (that's bad)
3 :
No one's gonna nuke anyone, if they did, then the world will be gone.
4 :
Arrogance in inherent in Americans, isn't it ? Do you think nuking a country is a picnic ? There are consequences for everything. USA is not #1 anymore. There are other countries with nuclear weapons, there are other countries with stronger intelligence and there are other countries with more sophisticated weapons . You don't hear about them in America but this is true. Nuking North Korea would be stupid because they never have threatened the security of USA. Neither had Iraq. The explanation could go on.... but to sum it up... if you'll are fools. You are the most arrogant type of fools. PS: I am not anti-american , I am not an arab , I am not a terrorist. I am from country with very good ties to USA and yes, we have nuclear weapons too.
5 :
I'm US Army infantry. A paratrooper. My friends are the ones getting it in the neck in Afghanistan. So listen up, bud, I'm going to explain why we do it the way we do. We fight to advance the rule of law, not the rule of might. Life is NOT more valuable than liberty. If a few thousand of our countrymen have to die so the law is upheld, and freedom preserved, so be it. I prefer that to living in a tyrannical land where the ownership of nuclear weapons confers the right to kill anyone we deem a potential threat. As bitter a pill as it may be - sacrificing the strategic initiative, and losing soldiers' lives in protracted wars - it's better than having nothing to differentiate myself from those we fight. If I die, it is knowing I put my blood where it is needed, and that by 'coddling' those terrorists with rights to sue I preserve what this nation is founded on: equality and freedom. Do they need to die? Hell yes. But by the book.
6 :
Look in the mirror to find the biggest fool of all. That rant you just posted contains some of the most mindless nonsense and Chimpanzee thinking posted on here in a long time - which is really saying something. I think the entire world can be greatful that cooler heads than yours are in charge.
7 :
you ask "Are we idiots or merely fools?" does that mean more than one of you asked the question? ...if so, then one of you is an idiot, and the other one is a fool.
8 :
We are fools. You know we will not use nuclear weapons against a weak opponent and without a missile defense shield up and operational, we will eventually watch on t.v. as one of our beautiful cities is struck by a single nuclear missile obtained by a rouge or terrorist organization. Who has control of all the former Soviet Union ICBMs? Sure the politicians will be outraged and the citizens will be outraged! But you have to know by now that we need to get a bloody nose before we would take actions against any current threats to global peace such as the political leaders of Iran and North Korea.
9 :
i agree with some of your giant post but we can not just go nuking everyone who poses a threat to the United States
10 :
How is them nuking us or us nuking them going to solve anything? Then we'll both die. Have you forgotten the 80's? (maybe you weren't born, as you sound young and naive). We will need to use detente.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should wait for some one to nuke you like you did to the Japanese , some one to invade you like you invaded Iraq, and someone to conquer your land like you did to the red indians.
2 :
Dude, who'se gonna read this giant post. Plus, if we "nuke" them, there will be consequential nuclear fallout in countries that are our allies. (that's bad)
3 :
No one's gonna nuke anyone, if they did, then the world will be gone.
4 :
Arrogance in inherent in Americans, isn't it ? Do you think nuking a country is a picnic ? There are consequences for everything. USA is not #1 anymore. There are other countries with nuclear weapons, there are other countries with stronger intelligence and there are other countries with more sophisticated weapons . You don't hear about them in America but this is true. Nuking North Korea would be stupid because they never have threatened the security of USA. Neither had Iraq. The explanation could go on.... but to sum it up... if you'll are fools. You are the most arrogant type of fools. PS: I am not anti-american , I am not an arab , I am not a terrorist. I am from country with very good ties to USA and yes, we have nuclear weapons too.
5 :
I'm US Army infantry. A paratrooper. My friends are the ones getting it in the neck in Afghanistan. So listen up, bud, I'm going to explain why we do it the way we do. We fight to advance the rule of law, not the rule of might. Life is NOT more valuable than liberty. If a few thousand of our countrymen have to die so the law is upheld, and freedom preserved, so be it. I prefer that to living in a tyrannical land where the ownership of nuclear weapons confers the right to kill anyone we deem a potential threat. As bitter a pill as it may be - sacrificing the strategic initiative, and losing soldiers' lives in protracted wars - it's better than having nothing to differentiate myself from those we fight. If I die, it is knowing I put my blood where it is needed, and that by 'coddling' those terrorists with rights to sue I preserve what this nation is founded on: equality and freedom. Do they need to die? Hell yes. But by the book.
6 :
Look in the mirror to find the biggest fool of all. That rant you just posted contains some of the most mindless nonsense and Chimpanzee thinking posted on here in a long time - which is really saying something. I think the entire world can be greatful that cooler heads than yours are in charge.
7 :
you ask "Are we idiots or merely fools?" does that mean more than one of you asked the question? ...if so, then one of you is an idiot, and the other one is a fool.
8 :
We are fools. You know we will not use nuclear weapons against a weak opponent and without a missile defense shield up and operational, we will eventually watch on t.v. as one of our beautiful cities is struck by a single nuclear missile obtained by a rouge or terrorist organization. Who has control of all the former Soviet Union ICBMs? Sure the politicians will be outraged and the citizens will be outraged! But you have to know by now that we need to get a bloody nose before we would take actions against any current threats to global peace such as the political leaders of Iran and North Korea.
9 :
i agree with some of your giant post but we can not just go nuking everyone who poses a threat to the United States
10 :
How is them nuking us or us nuking them going to solve anything? Then we'll both die. Have you forgotten the 80's? (maybe you weren't born, as you sound young and naive). We will need to use detente.
Monday, February 7, 2011
Will we wait until al queda overthrows the pakistani regime and seizes their nukes before we nuke
Will we wait until al queda overthrows the pakistani regime and seizes their nukes before we nuke?
The bible approves nuking enemies. 1 Samuel 15:1-16. Why dont we do it now? Do we need another 9/11 before we wake up? Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Wow, you're a real warmongerer. Remeber World War II? The Japanese were just about willing to sign the Potsdam agreement, they needed a clause about their emperor, so we decide to blow uap 200,000 civilians? It may have ended the war, but there were better and more moral ways to do it.
2 :
We are fools that are not stupid enough to precipitate the end of the world as we know it. We wont use nukes ever now that the Bear is dead! I thank my god and you should thank yours!!!
3 :
I am sorry that you are home huddled in fear about a terrorist attack.....but where do you get the idea that if we nuke ANYONE the rest of the world wont nuke us???? You are huddled in fear about an attack....with your thinking we all would be huddled in fear waiting to gasp our last breaths. Your kind of brain is what makes the world a messed up place. Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 :
So Much Hatred is in the air. . what did you drink man...................
The bible approves nuking enemies. 1 Samuel 15:1-16. Why dont we do it now? Do we need another 9/11 before we wake up? Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Wow, you're a real warmongerer. Remeber World War II? The Japanese were just about willing to sign the Potsdam agreement, they needed a clause about their emperor, so we decide to blow uap 200,000 civilians? It may have ended the war, but there were better and more moral ways to do it.
2 :
We are fools that are not stupid enough to precipitate the end of the world as we know it. We wont use nukes ever now that the Bear is dead! I thank my god and you should thank yours!!!
3 :
I am sorry that you are home huddled in fear about a terrorist attack.....but where do you get the idea that if we nuke ANYONE the rest of the world wont nuke us???? You are huddled in fear about an attack....with your thinking we all would be huddled in fear waiting to gasp our last breaths. Your kind of brain is what makes the world a messed up place. Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 :
So Much Hatred is in the air. . what did you drink man...................
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Have we lost our sense of self preservation
Have we lost our sense of self preservation?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. There is no we. Never use the word we. You should know exactly what I mean. You are an idiot who still doesn't know the word peace. The middle east is more peaceful than you. You posess the most weapons in the world, you know that if you use them in an unacceptible way people would kill you and yet you still create them, never use them and leave it there to rot in many cases! You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. This is just plainly pathetic! Some of you warloving Americans idiots say you live in a Christian nation when you don't even know that the peacemakers are blessed. You Americans should go back into the feudal age to learn that war isn't profitable and its pointless.
2 :
Way to much to read..But I'm taking care of myself just fine.
3 :
SG, Our Constitution has one flaw. One that the makers of it could not have foreseen. While it is arguably the one of the greatest documents on the planet, this minor flaw, a single word, causes us a great deal of grief. The flaw, just one word-"person" instead of "citizen." Consider the difference. What people in other countries do not understand, is that in all our wars, we have never asked for any land, except for that used to bury our dead in those countries. France, Belgium, Germany have much land that is cemeteries. For this, we are called "imperialists." I hope that we are not burying anyone in the Middle East. Senator, who answered before I did had an interesting statement, to quote his answer: [You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. ] It is not US soldiers who are carrying AK-47's and shooting people all over the world with them. US soldiers are not kidnapping and raping and terrorizing all over the world. US soldiers are not blowing up themselves in crowded markets or beside schools. US soldiers are not setting off car bombs, killing people and maiming people, either. It is followers of Islam that are doing this. Most followers of Islam are peaceful. It is the ones that are not peaceful, the extremists that are causing the problem and killing people. Senator, why do you not decry them? Why blame Americans? Maybe you should read about the Barbary Pirates, among other things. What kind of fools are we? Hard to tell. We do have the best standard of living of any large country in the world. We have a free society. We have accomplished a lot, and we have more to do. We are the place that everyone seems to want to come to, for whatever reason, and it has been that way for many years. Yet, we are called warmongers and imperialists. Sticks and stones, to me. When I see people on the news burning US flags and shouting "Death to America!" I see a target, because these, to me, are either terrorists, or terrorists to be. I wish I knew why they shout this. What have we done to them. What have I done to them? If these shouters come here, they are protected by our Constitution, because they are "persons," not citizens, dammit. Regards, Dan
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. There is no we. Never use the word we. You should know exactly what I mean. You are an idiot who still doesn't know the word peace. The middle east is more peaceful than you. You posess the most weapons in the world, you know that if you use them in an unacceptible way people would kill you and yet you still create them, never use them and leave it there to rot in many cases! You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. This is just plainly pathetic! Some of you warloving Americans idiots say you live in a Christian nation when you don't even know that the peacemakers are blessed. You Americans should go back into the feudal age to learn that war isn't profitable and its pointless.
2 :
Way to much to read..But I'm taking care of myself just fine.
3 :
SG, Our Constitution has one flaw. One that the makers of it could not have foreseen. While it is arguably the one of the greatest documents on the planet, this minor flaw, a single word, causes us a great deal of grief. The flaw, just one word-"person" instead of "citizen." Consider the difference. What people in other countries do not understand, is that in all our wars, we have never asked for any land, except for that used to bury our dead in those countries. France, Belgium, Germany have much land that is cemeteries. For this, we are called "imperialists." I hope that we are not burying anyone in the Middle East. Senator, who answered before I did had an interesting statement, to quote his answer: [You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. ] It is not US soldiers who are carrying AK-47's and shooting people all over the world with them. US soldiers are not kidnapping and raping and terrorizing all over the world. US soldiers are not blowing up themselves in crowded markets or beside schools. US soldiers are not setting off car bombs, killing people and maiming people, either. It is followers of Islam that are doing this. Most followers of Islam are peaceful. It is the ones that are not peaceful, the extremists that are causing the problem and killing people. Senator, why do you not decry them? Why blame Americans? Maybe you should read about the Barbary Pirates, among other things. What kind of fools are we? Hard to tell. We do have the best standard of living of any large country in the world. We have a free society. We have accomplished a lot, and we have more to do. We are the place that everyone seems to want to come to, for whatever reason, and it has been that way for many years. Yet, we are called warmongers and imperialists. Sticks and stones, to me. When I see people on the news burning US flags and shouting "Death to America!" I see a target, because these, to me, are either terrorists, or terrorists to be. I wish I knew why they shout this. What have we done to them. What have I done to them? If these shouters come here, they are protected by our Constitution, because they are "persons," not citizens, dammit. Regards, Dan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)