When al queda and the taliban topple the pakistani regime and seize their nukes,where can we hide?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Well, we will send another bomb to cross the path and destroy it.
2 :
We are fools for believing in Bush. Now it's know that he lied to us most American don't want to hole him accountable for his actions. I don't like the fact that our Flag has become know around the world as GUN, LIES AND TORTURE. Do you like that.
3 :
Pakistan may have a screwed up Govt. but since the Pakistani military basically runs the whole country anyway & they haven't given Al Qaeda any nukes unless Al Qaeda defeats the entire Pakistani military they won't ever get any nukes from them. Terrorists groups are built for cowardly terrorist attacks not for taking over countries as we have scene in their failure of taking over Iraq. Al Qaeda would have a much better shot at getting a nuke from the black market than Pakistan which is what the US is much more worried about.
4 :
Yes we should wake up. Pakistan, Iran, and China all have as much right to defend themselves as we do. If we don't want to be retaliated against, we should not invade other people's countries. Duh.
5 :
I agree 500% with you. I'm in the military and if it was up to me, I would nuke every single corner of that piece of shit country. We are the only ones who follow the geneva convention while they torture everyone they capture. You have to consider that this is not a war "against" terrorism. Its a war "for" making some people (we know who they are) a lot of money. Its blood money, but who cares? Its the green that matters. Consciousness does not play an important role in this. Hell, If i could make a billion easy i would. What if lifes would be lost? Well, If im not there to see it, Maybe its not really happening! Oohh! what is that fuzzy feeling that I have in my pockets? Guess im gonna go out and get me some new golf clubs!!!
6 :
We have killed over a million innocent Iraqi civilians in five years of war. According to one estimate (by noted journalist Dahr Jamail) ONE IN TWO Iraqis is either wounded, homeless or dead because of the war. We torture people who have not been convicted of any crime (and who have often been KIDNAPPED BY BOUNTY HUNTERS) at Guantanamo. Our depleted uranium has been used in Iraq and Afghanistan, and by Israel in Lebanon. Depleted uranium is radioactive for BILLIONS OF YEARS and is rendering the entire Middle East radioactive. Now, when a woman gives birth in Iraq, the first question people ask is not, "Is it a boy or girl?" but "Is it normal?" Depleted uranium (DU) is affecting our own troops in Iraq, too. This is something our mainstream media, which is completely controlled by pro-Israeli interests, does not tell us. Nor does it tell us that thousands of Palestinians including WOMEN AND CHILDREN are held and tortured in Israeli jails. Yet, we give Israel billions every year. This is why the US is hated throughout the Middle East. I am ashamed to tell people when I go there that I am American. If you want to know why anti-American forces succeed in getting people to support them in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan, try reading al-Ahram (Cairo) or Electronic Intifada. They are both online. Or read B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights committee. When you start to understand how cruel America has actually been towards Arabs, you will be sickened that our country could do what it does. And the reason you don't see articles like this one stay up very long is because pro-Israel groups in America are organize and complain and have these sorts of posts censored whenever THE TRUTH is told.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Why don't we show Islam who's who
Why don't we show Islam who's who?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we? reply to first answer of "prophet. Why dont you stick your head in the ground and leave it there? If it cant work above ground maybe it will work as fertilizer
Military - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
All I can say is, I wish I didn't have to share my planet with you, and people like you. You're the terrorist.
2 :
Can open... Worms all over the place!
3 :
Well I can see you've had a fair share of poorly argued answers, so I apologize in advance that the only response I can muster up to this is "I wish I lived in Monaco"
4 :
so boring. please why didnt you write a small rant? anyway i read ur last line and the answer is : you are fools of the first order.
5 :
We can't just go around Nuking people... I think many other nations wouldn't take kindly to that... I'm going to leave it at that because there was so much wrong with your illogical thoughts.
6 :
Since when is Islamic terrorism new? Do you know your history, they were hijacking airliners even before Pablo Escobar or Timothy McVeigh. By the way even if by some magic miracle all islamic terrorists were defeated, that doesn't mean terrorism would ever stop. Look up terrorism anywhere.... wikipedia.... the IRA, the Columbian Cartels, even the nerve gas attacks in Japan, what about tht wonderful anthrax a few years ago that they found was from the U.S. military?
7 :
Bible supports nuking enemies: 1 Samuel 15:1-9
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we? reply to first answer of "prophet. Why dont you stick your head in the ground and leave it there? If it cant work above ground maybe it will work as fertilizer
Military - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
All I can say is, I wish I didn't have to share my planet with you, and people like you. You're the terrorist.
2 :
Can open... Worms all over the place!
3 :
Well I can see you've had a fair share of poorly argued answers, so I apologize in advance that the only response I can muster up to this is "I wish I lived in Monaco"
4 :
so boring. please why didnt you write a small rant? anyway i read ur last line and the answer is : you are fools of the first order.
5 :
We can't just go around Nuking people... I think many other nations wouldn't take kindly to that... I'm going to leave it at that because there was so much wrong with your illogical thoughts.
6 :
Since when is Islamic terrorism new? Do you know your history, they were hijacking airliners even before Pablo Escobar or Timothy McVeigh. By the way even if by some magic miracle all islamic terrorists were defeated, that doesn't mean terrorism would ever stop. Look up terrorism anywhere.... wikipedia.... the IRA, the Columbian Cartels, even the nerve gas attacks in Japan, what about tht wonderful anthrax a few years ago that they found was from the U.S. military?
7 :
Bible supports nuking enemies: 1 Samuel 15:1-9
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
What kind of fools have nukes, have enemies with nukes, and sit there, not firing them but waiting to get hit
What kind of fools have nukes, have enemies with nukes, and sit there, not firing them but waiting to get hit?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We are fools, but not such big fools as to believe we could actually win a war in which nukes are used.
2 :
Where to begin. Allow me to nicely say that you need to learn how the world works and what countries will fight for what countries.
3 :
Your careless attitude towards innocent Non-American life is utterly disturbing
4 :
I pray you will never be in a position of power anytime in you life. Winning wars is all that matters to you? Having a little badge that says "Oh hey i won this war." Well congrats, but most of those people that would have died from those attacks were INNOCENT!
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We are fools, but not such big fools as to believe we could actually win a war in which nukes are used.
2 :
Where to begin. Allow me to nicely say that you need to learn how the world works and what countries will fight for what countries.
3 :
Your careless attitude towards innocent Non-American life is utterly disturbing
4 :
I pray you will never be in a position of power anytime in you life. Winning wars is all that matters to you? Having a little badge that says "Oh hey i won this war." Well congrats, but most of those people that would have died from those attacks were INNOCENT!
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Are we idiots or merely fools
Are we idiots or merely fools?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we? TO KARINA: Why dont you stick your head in the ground and leave it there? If it cant work above ground, maybe it will work as fertilizer.
Military - 12 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we are puppets being controlled by an idiot
2 :
merely fools
3 :
foolish idiots
4 :
You are neither a fool nor an idiot.
5 :
we are idiot fools.
6 :
Let's have fun and everyone pick one reason why this is obviously not an American. We never refer to ourselves as "Yanks"
7 :
If it is SG, both.
8 :
You are are a fool and an idiot but really you are deeply evil and Satanic. The US did worse than the Nazis. We killed millions of people in Iraq and over 12 million in Afghanistan. We made hundreds of millions of people homeless. We contaminated their land with radioactive waste. We denied them food and water. Anyone who thinks the US is right is a devil. Before we invaded Afghanistan, before 9/11, the US had already murdered over a million Iraqi infants and hundreds of thousands of Afghanis simply by declaring an embargo against their country and not allowing them to get any food except for in Iraq under Hussein they got two tablespoons of lentils as rations per day. Now they get nothing. Kabul alone is filled with tens of thousands of orphan children sleeping in the street eating garbage. Because of you. People like you. Racist murderer killers like you. By the way this question was posted yesterday so you are probably right, commenter. It's not an American. It's an Israeli spy trying to get Americans to commit suicide for Israel.
9 :
If you are going to criticize the Liberals about not attacking China with atomic bombs,you forgot that the goal was to contain the conflict. You conveniently forgot that President George Herbert Walker Bush decided not to go after Saddam Hussein and stopped after Kuwait was liberated since they did not have plans beyond a goal they met. Presidents Harry Truman and George Herbert Walker Bush ARE combat veterans and know the ugly side of war that war hawks glorify. Atomic weapons sterilize the area that it takes time for people to return, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As for 9-11 there is no proof of why World Trade Center building 7 went down since it was not hit by the two jets. Also there are no plane parts shown for evidence from the attack on the Pentagon. Why were the video tapes confiscated and not shown ?
10 :
I don't know about the "we" in your question - who gave you the right to speak for such a lot of people? - but I do know that You (and apparently you have some company judging from some of these answers) are an idiot and a fool who apparently does not understand the nuclear bomb's power and the side effects of turning them loose. Perhaps had you spent the time reading up on it instead of writing this long monologue of hate and power mongering, you would know. I have given you a place to start but Google has hundreds of thousands of pages on the subject.
11 :
You have no concept about the tactics used in this war. We are not facing massed troops with aerial and armored support. The enemy, the "hirabah", are gathered in small groups in a "Beyit Al Shuhada" (Martyrs House) to plot and carry out suicide missions, mostly against civilians and even their fellow Muslims. So, the tactics call for small unit involvement (platoon down to squad size) and also in urban environments, which is the most deadly to troops. Use of nuclear weapons in such a battle space would be the equivalent of using a piano for a paper weight. We did not go to war in Iraq in 1991. We were part of a UN Peace Enforcement Mission whose goal was to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait and thereby restore the state of things which existed prior to Iraq's invasion of that Emirate. That was what was set forth in UN Security Council #789 and in House Concurrent Resolution #99 which authorized the use of U.S. troops to carry out that mission and to meet our obligation under Article 45 of the UN Charter.
12 :
I didn't read that because my attention span is not that long; however, i agree with what karina said
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we? TO KARINA: Why dont you stick your head in the ground and leave it there? If it cant work above ground, maybe it will work as fertilizer.
Military - 12 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we are puppets being controlled by an idiot
2 :
merely fools
3 :
foolish idiots
4 :
You are neither a fool nor an idiot.
5 :
we are idiot fools.
6 :
Let's have fun and everyone pick one reason why this is obviously not an American. We never refer to ourselves as "Yanks"
7 :
If it is SG, both.
8 :
You are are a fool and an idiot but really you are deeply evil and Satanic. The US did worse than the Nazis. We killed millions of people in Iraq and over 12 million in Afghanistan. We made hundreds of millions of people homeless. We contaminated their land with radioactive waste. We denied them food and water. Anyone who thinks the US is right is a devil. Before we invaded Afghanistan, before 9/11, the US had already murdered over a million Iraqi infants and hundreds of thousands of Afghanis simply by declaring an embargo against their country and not allowing them to get any food except for in Iraq under Hussein they got two tablespoons of lentils as rations per day. Now they get nothing. Kabul alone is filled with tens of thousands of orphan children sleeping in the street eating garbage. Because of you. People like you. Racist murderer killers like you. By the way this question was posted yesterday so you are probably right, commenter. It's not an American. It's an Israeli spy trying to get Americans to commit suicide for Israel.
9 :
If you are going to criticize the Liberals about not attacking China with atomic bombs,you forgot that the goal was to contain the conflict. You conveniently forgot that President George Herbert Walker Bush decided not to go after Saddam Hussein and stopped after Kuwait was liberated since they did not have plans beyond a goal they met. Presidents Harry Truman and George Herbert Walker Bush ARE combat veterans and know the ugly side of war that war hawks glorify. Atomic weapons sterilize the area that it takes time for people to return, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As for 9-11 there is no proof of why World Trade Center building 7 went down since it was not hit by the two jets. Also there are no plane parts shown for evidence from the attack on the Pentagon. Why were the video tapes confiscated and not shown ?
10 :
I don't know about the "we" in your question - who gave you the right to speak for such a lot of people? - but I do know that You (and apparently you have some company judging from some of these answers) are an idiot and a fool who apparently does not understand the nuclear bomb's power and the side effects of turning them loose. Perhaps had you spent the time reading up on it instead of writing this long monologue of hate and power mongering, you would know. I have given you a place to start but Google has hundreds of thousands of pages on the subject.
11 :
You have no concept about the tactics used in this war. We are not facing massed troops with aerial and armored support. The enemy, the "hirabah", are gathered in small groups in a "Beyit Al Shuhada" (Martyrs House) to plot and carry out suicide missions, mostly against civilians and even their fellow Muslims. So, the tactics call for small unit involvement (platoon down to squad size) and also in urban environments, which is the most deadly to troops. Use of nuclear weapons in such a battle space would be the equivalent of using a piano for a paper weight. We did not go to war in Iraq in 1991. We were part of a UN Peace Enforcement Mission whose goal was to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait and thereby restore the state of things which existed prior to Iraq's invasion of that Emirate. That was what was set forth in UN Security Council #789 and in House Concurrent Resolution #99 which authorized the use of U.S. troops to carry out that mission and to meet our obligation under Article 45 of the UN Charter.
12 :
I didn't read that because my attention span is not that long; however, i agree with what karina said
Sunday, November 21, 2010
When al queda and the taliban topple the pakistani regime, and seize its nukes, where will be hide
When al queda and the taliban topple the pakistani regime, and seize its nukes, where will be hide?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we? 0;9114: its fearmongering? Well, what is the USA doing to stop it? letting more and more yanks die every day? reply to snow web: You're doing your job? But are you succeeding? How long must you and your comrades keep dying before reason will prevail and victory is achieved?
Military - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
that want happen because the free nation of the world will obliterate Pakistan if this happen . stop being such a fearmonger kid
2 :
Very well thought out and articulated monologue. First, as a former nuclear soldier, the last thing in the world that I and most of my fellow crewman ever wanted to see was our birds stand on their tails and fly. It was the Cold War then, and we knew that if we launched, we would certainly be dead within ten minutes of the rounds leaving the pad. The only question would be the manner of our deaths and by whom it would be accomplished. We were not afriad to die, we joined with the thought very much in the forefront of our minds. But, we also knew that our deaths would precede a million or more people who had done nothing to us and were little different than our own families. Nukes don't kill terrorists. Nukes don't kill facist regimes. Nukes don't destroy enemy governments. Of the tens of thousands of people (the lucky ones) who were vaporized in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the hundreds of thousands who died from exposure to radiation, the vast majority were innocent civilians, women, children, the elderly. And, regardless of the fact that Japan surrendered 6 days after the Nagasaki attack, the bombs were not the catalyst for surrender beyond the fact that they only hastened it. Surrender was coming, Fat Man and Little Boy only illustrated to the empire that the US was prepared to go further than Japan could. If there were a way to specifically target a nuclear device on those who are actually committing the evil, leaving NO collateral damage, I'd say go for it. But, there isn't. In the reality of war, we still need grunts to slug it out face to face with the enemy. Most who serve know that going in. It is the hallmark of their courage. Please don't cheapen the gift they offer by presuming a piece of technology can replace it with the push of a button. Cry for the soldiers we lose. Weep for the wounded. Cheer for those who return. Celebrate the sacrifice of every one of them. But, don't surrender to panic. And, unless you have stood watch on the wall yourself, don't even dare pretend to know the best course of action for those who have and do.
3 :
you should be a politician, here have a cookie, or better yet a star.
4 :
We are tax paying, hard-workin', gun-totin, bible-thumpin', a**kicking, better than anything else in history kind of fools. When push comes to shove, they know to send in Mother Green and her killing machine. Marines are here for one thing: "Our morale began to break when the dying Marines kept coming." -Japanese survivors captured at Tarawa. Marines don't quit until they are dead. And that commitment still holds. Just show us where they are and let us do our jobs. That's all we ask. Edit in response to poster: We, the military, don't make that decision. Our elected civilian leadership will turn us loose at the proper time when it comes to nukes......
5 :
It's Mutually Assured Destruction. No one, including the US, is going to launch a nuke, or everyone dies. And we apologize as long as we don't feel threatened. We haven't been in a serious war since WWII. Vietnam was terrible, but they weren't a real threat. We got rid of terrorists' rights when we were attacked, but now that we took the fight to a far away place, we feel free to apologize.
6 :
I might point out that the range, number, and proven effectiveness of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is nothing compared to ours, or even to its neighbor India, at whom most of those nukes are aimed and were meant for. Also, Al Qaeda HATES Musharraf's government; they're not exactly in cahoots. We're providing quite a lot of support to help bolster his government against internal would-be saboteurs, and his military's effectiveness against them is actually reasonable. Al Qaeda's only really shown any kind of longevity or strength in the most remote, pro-Wahabbi enclaves, NOT the country as a whole. Our interest in Pakistan isn't only because of its proximity to Afghanistan, but because of its proximity to India, with whom we have pretty good relations... and generally it's a good idea to keep two friends from fighting, if at all possible, particularly when there are nukes involved. I don't think we should be coddling terrorists or villifying our own troops or any of those other things, of course; I just wanted to point out that Al Qaeda makes itself out to be much stronger than it is, and that our media is only too happy to oblige them.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we? 0;9114: its fearmongering? Well, what is the USA doing to stop it? letting more and more yanks die every day? reply to snow web: You're doing your job? But are you succeeding? How long must you and your comrades keep dying before reason will prevail and victory is achieved?
Military - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
that want happen because the free nation of the world will obliterate Pakistan if this happen . stop being such a fearmonger kid
2 :
Very well thought out and articulated monologue. First, as a former nuclear soldier, the last thing in the world that I and most of my fellow crewman ever wanted to see was our birds stand on their tails and fly. It was the Cold War then, and we knew that if we launched, we would certainly be dead within ten minutes of the rounds leaving the pad. The only question would be the manner of our deaths and by whom it would be accomplished. We were not afriad to die, we joined with the thought very much in the forefront of our minds. But, we also knew that our deaths would precede a million or more people who had done nothing to us and were little different than our own families. Nukes don't kill terrorists. Nukes don't kill facist regimes. Nukes don't destroy enemy governments. Of the tens of thousands of people (the lucky ones) who were vaporized in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the hundreds of thousands who died from exposure to radiation, the vast majority were innocent civilians, women, children, the elderly. And, regardless of the fact that Japan surrendered 6 days after the Nagasaki attack, the bombs were not the catalyst for surrender beyond the fact that they only hastened it. Surrender was coming, Fat Man and Little Boy only illustrated to the empire that the US was prepared to go further than Japan could. If there were a way to specifically target a nuclear device on those who are actually committing the evil, leaving NO collateral damage, I'd say go for it. But, there isn't. In the reality of war, we still need grunts to slug it out face to face with the enemy. Most who serve know that going in. It is the hallmark of their courage. Please don't cheapen the gift they offer by presuming a piece of technology can replace it with the push of a button. Cry for the soldiers we lose. Weep for the wounded. Cheer for those who return. Celebrate the sacrifice of every one of them. But, don't surrender to panic. And, unless you have stood watch on the wall yourself, don't even dare pretend to know the best course of action for those who have and do.
3 :
you should be a politician, here have a cookie, or better yet a star.
4 :
We are tax paying, hard-workin', gun-totin, bible-thumpin', a**kicking, better than anything else in history kind of fools. When push comes to shove, they know to send in Mother Green and her killing machine. Marines are here for one thing: "Our morale began to break when the dying Marines kept coming." -Japanese survivors captured at Tarawa. Marines don't quit until they are dead. And that commitment still holds. Just show us where they are and let us do our jobs. That's all we ask. Edit in response to poster: We, the military, don't make that decision. Our elected civilian leadership will turn us loose at the proper time when it comes to nukes......
5 :
It's Mutually Assured Destruction. No one, including the US, is going to launch a nuke, or everyone dies. And we apologize as long as we don't feel threatened. We haven't been in a serious war since WWII. Vietnam was terrible, but they weren't a real threat. We got rid of terrorists' rights when we were attacked, but now that we took the fight to a far away place, we feel free to apologize.
6 :
I might point out that the range, number, and proven effectiveness of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is nothing compared to ours, or even to its neighbor India, at whom most of those nukes are aimed and were meant for. Also, Al Qaeda HATES Musharraf's government; they're not exactly in cahoots. We're providing quite a lot of support to help bolster his government against internal would-be saboteurs, and his military's effectiveness against them is actually reasonable. Al Qaeda's only really shown any kind of longevity or strength in the most remote, pro-Wahabbi enclaves, NOT the country as a whole. Our interest in Pakistan isn't only because of its proximity to Afghanistan, but because of its proximity to India, with whom we have pretty good relations... and generally it's a good idea to keep two friends from fighting, if at all possible, particularly when there are nukes involved. I don't think we should be coddling terrorists or villifying our own troops or any of those other things, of course; I just wanted to point out that Al Qaeda makes itself out to be much stronger than it is, and that our media is only too happy to oblige them.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Lil Wayne's record execs predict his album will sell between 850,000 and 950,000 by the end of the week
Lil Wayne's record execs predict his album will sell between 850,000 and 950,000 by the end of the week... ??
Lil' Wayne's Tha Carter III came out this Tuesday morning, so exact figures have yet been determined, but execs at his music label estimate the album will sell between 850,000 and 950,000 by the end of its first week. Pat Monaco, exec VP of sales for the Universal Motown Republic Group, says that, "The accounts were bullish by 10 in the morning. The sales the first few hours were exceeding the rate that the Kanye album sold a year ago. Wayne was one of these records that, because it was so highly anticipated, with the leaks and everything, it caused more people to go out at 8 in the morning to buy the CD. And with the CD such a long time in the making, Monaco adds that finalizing the album was "like putting a traditional setup and street date on a guy that was just nontraditional. It changed dates, changed titles, changed songs, changed the people that were working on it. But sonically, the record bears out. *** DO YOU BUY OR SELL THIS??? *** SOURCE: http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-22448 yeah the source is perez hilton but he only passes on the information... he didn't come up with this.... I co-sign with Escobar.... Wayne will just spend the money on Lollipops and Cough Syrup haha
Rap and Hip-Hop - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I buy, he sold 425,000 on the first day.
2 :
sell your either are a diehard fan(who will wait in line for hours to ghet it) or you dont like him really at all (n most likely will not get or download it if not already)
3 :
Buy. Wayne has the one of the strongest following in history. No lie, I told this girl I had The Carter 3 on June 3rd when it was leaked on the net(I am a known bootlegger in my town), and she told me "So, Ill just buy it when it comes out the 10th." That's dedication.
4 :
849,999, I'm not buying
5 :
i dont care about sales but its a shame if anyone actully spends there money on this hot piece of diarrhea to who ever's interested in listening to this, DON'T BUY THIS ALBUM. Download Tha Carter III or get bootleg copies of the sh^t. Lil Wayne doesn't deserve the support or the sales. He's trying to extort money from us. That's how much he really cares about his fans.
6 :
i downloaded it. xD but i would've bought it, if i didn't have my sources over the web. the album was amazing, probably his best. :]] i loved it!
7 :
Buy downloading you idiots he still gets paid. illegaly he won' t but it would be good if he does sell that many in one week. To bad nobody says that about NAS
8 :
DAMN....that's alot of coasters, erb plates, and frisbees!!!
9 :
Buy; but i think it will go over a mil; he almost got half in the first day
10 :
Absolutely sell. I will never quite understand why everyone buys his garbage. However, as much as I dislike him I realize there is nothing I can do to change his fan bases' opinions to match mine, and personally, I think he is extremely lyrically overrated. "Poetically challenged", if I may.
Lil' Wayne's Tha Carter III came out this Tuesday morning, so exact figures have yet been determined, but execs at his music label estimate the album will sell between 850,000 and 950,000 by the end of its first week. Pat Monaco, exec VP of sales for the Universal Motown Republic Group, says that, "The accounts were bullish by 10 in the morning. The sales the first few hours were exceeding the rate that the Kanye album sold a year ago. Wayne was one of these records that, because it was so highly anticipated, with the leaks and everything, it caused more people to go out at 8 in the morning to buy the CD. And with the CD such a long time in the making, Monaco adds that finalizing the album was "like putting a traditional setup and street date on a guy that was just nontraditional. It changed dates, changed titles, changed songs, changed the people that were working on it. But sonically, the record bears out. *** DO YOU BUY OR SELL THIS??? *** SOURCE: http://perezhilton.com/2008-06-11-22448 yeah the source is perez hilton but he only passes on the information... he didn't come up with this.... I co-sign with Escobar.... Wayne will just spend the money on Lollipops and Cough Syrup haha
Rap and Hip-Hop - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I buy, he sold 425,000 on the first day.
2 :
sell your either are a diehard fan(who will wait in line for hours to ghet it) or you dont like him really at all (n most likely will not get or download it if not already)
3 :
Buy. Wayne has the one of the strongest following in history. No lie, I told this girl I had The Carter 3 on June 3rd when it was leaked on the net(I am a known bootlegger in my town), and she told me "So, Ill just buy it when it comes out the 10th." That's dedication.
4 :
849,999, I'm not buying
5 :
i dont care about sales but its a shame if anyone actully spends there money on this hot piece of diarrhea to who ever's interested in listening to this, DON'T BUY THIS ALBUM. Download Tha Carter III or get bootleg copies of the sh^t. Lil Wayne doesn't deserve the support or the sales. He's trying to extort money from us. That's how much he really cares about his fans.
6 :
i downloaded it. xD but i would've bought it, if i didn't have my sources over the web. the album was amazing, probably his best. :]] i loved it!
7 :
Buy downloading you idiots he still gets paid. illegaly he won' t but it would be good if he does sell that many in one week. To bad nobody says that about NAS
8 :
DAMN....that's alot of coasters, erb plates, and frisbees!!!
9 :
Buy; but i think it will go over a mil; he almost got half in the first day
10 :
Absolutely sell. I will never quite understand why everyone buys his garbage. However, as much as I dislike him I realize there is nothing I can do to change his fan bases' opinions to match mine, and personally, I think he is extremely lyrically overrated. "Poetically challenged", if I may.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Which mall would you rather go to to hang out
Which mall would you rather go to to hang out?
I'm going to the mall with my friend, her bf, and his friend. We cant pick which mall. Its more of a hangout then shopping Mall1 7 for All Mankind Abercrombie & Fitch adidas Originals Aeropostale Aldo Shoes American Eagle Outfitters Ann Taylor Ann Taylor Loft Anthropologie Apple Computer ArdenB. Asian Chao Atlanta Police Department Substation AtlanTIX Auntie Anne's Pretzels Aveda Lifestyle Store BabyGap Bailey Banks & Biddle Bakers Banana Republic Bank of America ATM Bare Escentuals Bath & Body Works BCBGMAXAZRIA bebe bebe Sport Betsey Johnson Bloomingdale's Bobby Jones Bostonian Shoe Brooks Brothers Brookstone Burberry Buster Brown BVLGARI Caché Cajun Supreme California Pizza Kitchen Calvin Klein Cartier Champs Sports Chick-fil-A Cinnabon Club Monaco Coach Corner Bakery Cafe Crate & Barrel DASS Salon & Spa Davante David Yurman Diesel Ecco Shoes Ecotage Salon and Spa ED Hardy Express FAO Schwarz in Macy's Farmer's Basket Fashion Tailor Fast Fix Jewelry Repair Florsheim Shoes Foot Locker French Connection Freshens Yogurt fye - For Your Entertainment Game Stop Gap GapKids Gateway Newstand GNC Godiva Chocolatier Great American Cookie Co. Great Steak & Potato Company Great Wraps Guess? Gymboree H. Stockton Atlanta Haagen-Dazs Heel Quik Herzing College Hollister Co. Hovan Gourmet HQ Shoe Shine Icing by Claire's It's About Time J. Crew Jacadi Johnston & Murphy Karen Millen Kate Spade Kenneth Cole Kids Foot Locker Kiehl's Since 1851 L'Occitane Lacoste Lady Foot Locker Landau Lenox Square Management Office LensCrafters Lids Lindt Chocolate Louis Vuitton LUSH MAC Cosmetics Macy's Optical Boutique Macy*s Madewell Man Alive Marmi Mayors Jewelers Metropark Michael Kors Mid America Research Mimi Maternity Miss Sixty / Energie Montblanc Mori Classics Mori Luggage & Gifts Mr. Pretzels MW Tux My Kitchen Nail Pizzazz Nathan's Famous Neiman Marcus Neiman Marcus Cafe Nicole Miller NikeStore Nine West Oakley Panera Bread Papyrus Pottery Barn Pottery Barn Kids Prime Prophecy E Store PUMA Ralph Lauren Restoration Hardware Sakkio Japan Salvatore Ferragamo Savvi Formalwear Sbarro Sephora Solstice Sony Style St. John Boutique Starbucks Coffee Steve Madden Stuart Weitzman Subway Sunglass Hut International Swarovski Crystal Swim & Sport T-Mobile Taco Bell Teavana The Art of Shaving The Body Shop The Forum Athletic Club The Limited The Monogram Shop The Rowdy Store The Tinder Box / Vino 100 The Walking Company Tourneau TOUS Travelex True Religion United Colors of Benetton Up Front Plus Premier Parking Urban Outfitters Victoria's Secret Victoria's Secret Beauty Vidal Sassoon Wet Seal Williams-Sonoma Wolf Camera & Video Zara Mall 2 Abercrombie & Fitch Adrenaline T-Shirts Aldo American Eagle Outfitters Amy's Hallmark Ann Taylor Ann Taylor Loft Anthropologie Apple Store Arden B AT&T Auntie Anne’s Aveda Bachrach Bailey Banks & Biddle Baja Bistro Bakers Banana Republic Bare Escentuals Barnie's Coffee Shop Anchor Bath & Body Works BCBGMAXAZRIA bebe BEBE SPORT Betsey Johnson Bloomingdale’s Anchor bluemercury Bourbon Street Brighton Collectibles Brooks Brothers Brookstone C&C Market Research Caché Cacique Cathy Jean Cellular Warehouse Cento’s Charlotte Russe Cheesecake Factory OutParcel Chick-Fil-A Chico’s Claire’s (The Icing) Clarks Coach Crabtree & Evelyn D'Scents Fragrances Dairy Queen DASS Salon & Spa Destination Maternity Dillard’s Anchor Doctor’s Vision Works EB Games Express Express Men Extraordinary Farmer’s Basket Fast Fix Jewelry Fiore Foot Locker Franklin Covey Gap Gap Kids Georgia Back Yard GEOX GNC Live Well Godiva Chocolatier Goldfish Goodyear Auto Center Great American Cookie Great Wraps Guess? Guest Services Gymboree® Haagen Dazs hanna Andersson Head Shots Helzberg Hovan Gourmet Hudson Grille Iroff & Son Jewelers It’s About Time J. Crew J. Jill Johnston & Murphy Justice (Limited Too) JY Lamis Know Style L’Occitane Lacoste Lane Bryant LensCrafters Limited Lindt Chocolate Lost & Found Lucky Brand Jeans LUSH MAC Cosmetics Macy's Furniture Gallery Macy’s Maggiano’s Little Italy Malibu Wings Mall Management Office Mammography Center Martin + Osa Metropark Mia & Maxx Mobile Life - Kiosk Mori Luggage & Gifts Nail Premier New York & Co. News/Necessities Nine West Nordstrom Nordstrom Cafe Nordstrom Espresso Bar Orange Julius Panda Express Papyrus Pet Set Picture People Piercing Pagoda Princess Jewelry Radio Shack Red
Adolescent - 16 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
whoa those both seem nice actually. all the malls near me dont have as many stores, and i live in california, land of the shopping haha. i was gonna say 1 because of the betsey johnson store, but both have that, so i would go with whichever one has a pet store.. because when your just hanging out in a mall, its fun to go pet and play with the puppies (: edit: nicole, neither of them having a hot topic is a GOOD thing. i wish that was true of any malls in southern california, but those stupid idiots get a store in EVERY SINGLE mall here. its lame, because i hate the kids that shop there, they annoy me.
2 :
... WHAT? if it's just for hanging out, why does it matter what stores there are? edit- sorry, i didn't mean to sound rude or anything. and to answer your question, i'd say mall 1.
3 :
mall 1
4 :
the first one. theres a lot more stores, meaning more time to hang out without getting bored (:
5 :
mall1. it sounds pretty cool(: we dont have malls like that in southern california..(: have fun
6 :
1 for sure :)
7 :
tmobile
8 :
Mall one FTW!!
9 :
Mall 1. But they're both nice. The mall we have here has less than 20 stores.
10 :
Mall 2- Has Sephora and Nordstroms. All that I need! :)
11 :
i would pick number 1 because it has urban outfitters, and that is my favorite store of all time. :C i wish i could go to a mall like that, dont find many of those in California. only one i went to that was giant, was in San Fran. and i live three hours from there so i neeeeeever ever ever go there. :CCC
12 :
mall 1
13 :
Wow. Both of those malls sound amazing. But mall 1 sounds better. My mall is lame. You're so lucky. ♫ ʎʇʇıʞ pÇdıɹʇs ʎʇʇÇɹd ♫
14 :
Eh. Mall 2 I guess. It has Panda Express. Neither have a Hot Topic though.
15 :
I would say mall number one because it has my two favorite stores. Hollister & Victoria Secret :)
16 :
All malls should kick kids just hanging around out quickly. Such kids just bother the real customers and more often than not are a major annoyance.
I'm going to the mall with my friend, her bf, and his friend. We cant pick which mall. Its more of a hangout then shopping Mall1 7 for All Mankind Abercrombie & Fitch adidas Originals Aeropostale Aldo Shoes American Eagle Outfitters Ann Taylor Ann Taylor Loft Anthropologie Apple Computer ArdenB. Asian Chao Atlanta Police Department Substation AtlanTIX Auntie Anne's Pretzels Aveda Lifestyle Store BabyGap Bailey Banks & Biddle Bakers Banana Republic Bank of America ATM Bare Escentuals Bath & Body Works BCBGMAXAZRIA bebe bebe Sport Betsey Johnson Bloomingdale's Bobby Jones Bostonian Shoe Brooks Brothers Brookstone Burberry Buster Brown BVLGARI Caché Cajun Supreme California Pizza Kitchen Calvin Klein Cartier Champs Sports Chick-fil-A Cinnabon Club Monaco Coach Corner Bakery Cafe Crate & Barrel DASS Salon & Spa Davante David Yurman Diesel Ecco Shoes Ecotage Salon and Spa ED Hardy Express FAO Schwarz in Macy's Farmer's Basket Fashion Tailor Fast Fix Jewelry Repair Florsheim Shoes Foot Locker French Connection Freshens Yogurt fye - For Your Entertainment Game Stop Gap GapKids Gateway Newstand GNC Godiva Chocolatier Great American Cookie Co. Great Steak & Potato Company Great Wraps Guess? Gymboree H. Stockton Atlanta Haagen-Dazs Heel Quik Herzing College Hollister Co. Hovan Gourmet HQ Shoe Shine Icing by Claire's It's About Time J. Crew Jacadi Johnston & Murphy Karen Millen Kate Spade Kenneth Cole Kids Foot Locker Kiehl's Since 1851 L'Occitane Lacoste Lady Foot Locker Landau Lenox Square Management Office LensCrafters Lids Lindt Chocolate Louis Vuitton LUSH MAC Cosmetics Macy's Optical Boutique Macy*s Madewell Man Alive Marmi Mayors Jewelers Metropark Michael Kors Mid America Research Mimi Maternity Miss Sixty / Energie Montblanc Mori Classics Mori Luggage & Gifts Mr. Pretzels MW Tux My Kitchen Nail Pizzazz Nathan's Famous Neiman Marcus Neiman Marcus Cafe Nicole Miller NikeStore Nine West Oakley Panera Bread Papyrus Pottery Barn Pottery Barn Kids Prime Prophecy E Store PUMA Ralph Lauren Restoration Hardware Sakkio Japan Salvatore Ferragamo Savvi Formalwear Sbarro Sephora Solstice Sony Style St. John Boutique Starbucks Coffee Steve Madden Stuart Weitzman Subway Sunglass Hut International Swarovski Crystal Swim & Sport T-Mobile Taco Bell Teavana The Art of Shaving The Body Shop The Forum Athletic Club The Limited The Monogram Shop The Rowdy Store The Tinder Box / Vino 100 The Walking Company Tourneau TOUS Travelex True Religion United Colors of Benetton Up Front Plus Premier Parking Urban Outfitters Victoria's Secret Victoria's Secret Beauty Vidal Sassoon Wet Seal Williams-Sonoma Wolf Camera & Video Zara Mall 2 Abercrombie & Fitch Adrenaline T-Shirts Aldo American Eagle Outfitters Amy's Hallmark Ann Taylor Ann Taylor Loft Anthropologie Apple Store Arden B AT&T Auntie Anne’s Aveda Bachrach Bailey Banks & Biddle Baja Bistro Bakers Banana Republic Bare Escentuals Barnie's Coffee Shop Anchor Bath & Body Works BCBGMAXAZRIA bebe BEBE SPORT Betsey Johnson Bloomingdale’s Anchor bluemercury Bourbon Street Brighton Collectibles Brooks Brothers Brookstone C&C Market Research Caché Cacique Cathy Jean Cellular Warehouse Cento’s Charlotte Russe Cheesecake Factory OutParcel Chick-Fil-A Chico’s Claire’s (The Icing) Clarks Coach Crabtree & Evelyn D'Scents Fragrances Dairy Queen DASS Salon & Spa Destination Maternity Dillard’s Anchor Doctor’s Vision Works EB Games Express Express Men Extraordinary Farmer’s Basket Fast Fix Jewelry Fiore Foot Locker Franklin Covey Gap Gap Kids Georgia Back Yard GEOX GNC Live Well Godiva Chocolatier Goldfish Goodyear Auto Center Great American Cookie Great Wraps Guess? Guest Services Gymboree® Haagen Dazs hanna Andersson Head Shots Helzberg Hovan Gourmet Hudson Grille Iroff & Son Jewelers It’s About Time J. Crew J. Jill Johnston & Murphy Justice (Limited Too) JY Lamis Know Style L’Occitane Lacoste Lane Bryant LensCrafters Limited Lindt Chocolate Lost & Found Lucky Brand Jeans LUSH MAC Cosmetics Macy's Furniture Gallery Macy’s Maggiano’s Little Italy Malibu Wings Mall Management Office Mammography Center Martin + Osa Metropark Mia & Maxx Mobile Life - Kiosk Mori Luggage & Gifts Nail Premier New York & Co. News/Necessities Nine West Nordstrom Nordstrom Cafe Nordstrom Espresso Bar Orange Julius Panda Express Papyrus Pet Set Picture People Piercing Pagoda Princess Jewelry Radio Shack Red
Adolescent - 16 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
whoa those both seem nice actually. all the malls near me dont have as many stores, and i live in california, land of the shopping haha. i was gonna say 1 because of the betsey johnson store, but both have that, so i would go with whichever one has a pet store.. because when your just hanging out in a mall, its fun to go pet and play with the puppies (: edit: nicole, neither of them having a hot topic is a GOOD thing. i wish that was true of any malls in southern california, but those stupid idiots get a store in EVERY SINGLE mall here. its lame, because i hate the kids that shop there, they annoy me.
2 :
... WHAT? if it's just for hanging out, why does it matter what stores there are? edit- sorry, i didn't mean to sound rude or anything. and to answer your question, i'd say mall 1.
3 :
mall 1
4 :
the first one. theres a lot more stores, meaning more time to hang out without getting bored (:
5 :
mall1. it sounds pretty cool(: we dont have malls like that in southern california..(: have fun
6 :
1 for sure :)
7 :
tmobile
8 :
Mall one FTW!!
9 :
Mall 1. But they're both nice. The mall we have here has less than 20 stores.
10 :
Mall 2- Has Sephora and Nordstroms. All that I need! :)
11 :
i would pick number 1 because it has urban outfitters, and that is my favorite store of all time. :C i wish i could go to a mall like that, dont find many of those in California. only one i went to that was giant, was in San Fran. and i live three hours from there so i neeeeeever ever ever go there. :CCC
12 :
mall 1
13 :
Wow. Both of those malls sound amazing. But mall 1 sounds better. My mall is lame. You're so lucky. ♫ ʎʇʇıʞ pÇdıɹʇs ʎʇʇÇɹd ♫
14 :
Eh. Mall 2 I guess. It has Panda Express. Neither have a Hot Topic though.
15 :
I would say mall number one because it has my two favorite stores. Hollister & Victoria Secret :)
16 :
All malls should kick kids just hanging around out quickly. Such kids just bother the real customers and more often than not are a major annoyance.
Monday, November 1, 2010
How do you handle rude, obnoxious, stuck up people who throw that on you, for no reason
How do you handle rude, obnoxious, stuck up people who throw that on you, for no reason?
Whether it be random people who act like that to you, undeservingly, or mall/store emplooyees who just act like that. Today I waltzed into a store, Club Monaco, and noticed that the tables were empty, so I asked one of the Chinese guys working there, why it's all empty , and he basically in a really snooty way, as to imply why am I asking went, "ummmm, like, errrr....we're getting in our new stuff....so like, okayyy?" ANd I thought, I really really don't need this attitude, from this f8cking ugly, rude, ch98nk. I know that sounds mean, but thats exactly what I was thinking, and I was just ugh. Then I asked him another question and he just I don't know...was listening to his ipod and cared more about that than anything else,...so I just walked out. WHen you come across people who are just...negative, destroy your good spirits, and just come across as non-caring, vile, and totally disrespectful.... how do you handle them? Ignoring obviously works but you know what? These people still...need to be taught a lesson. Why? Well they suck! I hate people who are so ..stuck up, or impressed with themselves, or act like total jerks, like they could care less about anything and treat you like you don't matter. I don't like players, I'm not meat, I'm a human. So naturally when someone treats me like another statistic, or like shit, I get offended. Just cuz AMERICA sucks in that way, and makes us all into meaningless drone consumers, doesn't mean that any of us have to take being treated that way. I for one am not. F8ck it. I'm HUMAN, and I want to be treated in a HUMAN way, not like....in a , oh im better than you way, or any other shitty way. Does anyone else see a problem with this kind of behavior here?
Other - Society & Culture - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
So, you mean like snooty employees. Simple: "Excuse me, but fuck you. Where is your manager?"
2 :
I usually get a sh!tty attitude back with them, and try to advertise their bad business in an effort to prevent them from getting enough customers to stay afloat. However I know chances are likely it won't work, so I just say F%$K you and go about my day.
3 :
You say they rude people need to be taught a lesson. Why? They're not going to change their personalities. You saying something rude back to them isn't going to make them change their behaviour, it's only going to make you annoyed because they won't care what you say. The only person who'll get frustrated is you. In most cases, you just have to ignore it and let it go.
4 :
First of all, don't insult his race. And by your comments, you can be as bad as he can be. Everyone is rude in some way or another, so technically there is nothing wrong with that behavior. It's human behavior. Not everyone one is going to be nice to you, not everyone is going to show respect to you. That's just life. Get over it. Or go to another store, where the people who work there won't treat you rudely and you would not need to get on Yahoo! Answers and cry about it.
5 :
Let it go. 99.99% of the time, we waste time by dwelling on things that stopped mattering twenty minutes ago.
6 :
It's hard to deal with people these days if you are a sweet, kind thoughtful person...and you get the bum rap for it...it is their upbringing I suppose, ...nothing like getting treated badly for a simple question...If i was that business owner, I would have fired that person, for running off a customer...customer service, doesnt' exist anymore I guess..sorry that happened to you...rise above it darling.
7 :
well, when somebody's giving me problems, i give them the finger. in 3rd grade, for example, there was this little b*tch who was always mean to me, calling me names and what not. and that was the first time i flipped someone off. and one time when i saw her at the park, and me and my friend threw rocks at her. i hit her right in the nose with one of them. which wasn't hard, because her nose is humongous. (spelling?) the really annoying part is that she was listening to music on a boombox. (this was in 6th grade btw) of course, since she's a prep, she was listening to pop music. i went up to her and said "take your annoying ass music and get the hell out of here" that's one way of dealing with things. :) oh, and obnoxious employees? yep, had my share of those. and people on the phone. there was this guy from the cable company who was telling us how to fix the internet (it didn't work that time) and he was being all stupid, just a jerk is all. when we told him that it didn't work after he told us what to do, i heard him say "f***" very quietly. and then i said "man, you're gay! and rude too!" and then i hung up and just laughed.
Whether it be random people who act like that to you, undeservingly, or mall/store emplooyees who just act like that. Today I waltzed into a store, Club Monaco, and noticed that the tables were empty, so I asked one of the Chinese guys working there, why it's all empty , and he basically in a really snooty way, as to imply why am I asking went, "ummmm, like, errrr....we're getting in our new stuff....so like, okayyy?" ANd I thought, I really really don't need this attitude, from this f8cking ugly, rude, ch98nk. I know that sounds mean, but thats exactly what I was thinking, and I was just ugh. Then I asked him another question and he just I don't know...was listening to his ipod and cared more about that than anything else,...so I just walked out. WHen you come across people who are just...negative, destroy your good spirits, and just come across as non-caring, vile, and totally disrespectful.... how do you handle them? Ignoring obviously works but you know what? These people still...need to be taught a lesson. Why? Well they suck! I hate people who are so ..stuck up, or impressed with themselves, or act like total jerks, like they could care less about anything and treat you like you don't matter. I don't like players, I'm not meat, I'm a human. So naturally when someone treats me like another statistic, or like shit, I get offended. Just cuz AMERICA sucks in that way, and makes us all into meaningless drone consumers, doesn't mean that any of us have to take being treated that way. I for one am not. F8ck it. I'm HUMAN, and I want to be treated in a HUMAN way, not like....in a , oh im better than you way, or any other shitty way. Does anyone else see a problem with this kind of behavior here?
Other - Society & Culture - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
So, you mean like snooty employees. Simple: "Excuse me, but fuck you. Where is your manager?"
2 :
I usually get a sh!tty attitude back with them, and try to advertise their bad business in an effort to prevent them from getting enough customers to stay afloat. However I know chances are likely it won't work, so I just say F%$K you and go about my day.
3 :
You say they rude people need to be taught a lesson. Why? They're not going to change their personalities. You saying something rude back to them isn't going to make them change their behaviour, it's only going to make you annoyed because they won't care what you say. The only person who'll get frustrated is you. In most cases, you just have to ignore it and let it go.
4 :
First of all, don't insult his race. And by your comments, you can be as bad as he can be. Everyone is rude in some way or another, so technically there is nothing wrong with that behavior. It's human behavior. Not everyone one is going to be nice to you, not everyone is going to show respect to you. That's just life. Get over it. Or go to another store, where the people who work there won't treat you rudely and you would not need to get on Yahoo! Answers and cry about it.
5 :
Let it go. 99.99% of the time, we waste time by dwelling on things that stopped mattering twenty minutes ago.
6 :
It's hard to deal with people these days if you are a sweet, kind thoughtful person...and you get the bum rap for it...it is their upbringing I suppose, ...nothing like getting treated badly for a simple question...If i was that business owner, I would have fired that person, for running off a customer...customer service, doesnt' exist anymore I guess..sorry that happened to you...rise above it darling.
7 :
well, when somebody's giving me problems, i give them the finger. in 3rd grade, for example, there was this little b*tch who was always mean to me, calling me names and what not. and that was the first time i flipped someone off. and one time when i saw her at the park, and me and my friend threw rocks at her. i hit her right in the nose with one of them. which wasn't hard, because her nose is humongous. (spelling?) the really annoying part is that she was listening to music on a boombox. (this was in 6th grade btw) of course, since she's a prep, she was listening to pop music. i went up to her and said "take your annoying ass music and get the hell out of here" that's one way of dealing with things. :) oh, and obnoxious employees? yep, had my share of those. and people on the phone. there was this guy from the cable company who was telling us how to fix the internet (it didn't work that time) and he was being all stupid, just a jerk is all. when we told him that it didn't work after he told us what to do, i heard him say "f***" very quietly. and then i said "man, you're gay! and rude too!" and then i hung up and just laughed.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
What kind of fools are we
What kind of fools are we?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 3000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
To quote Slim Pickens," YEEEEEEHAAAAAAWWWWW!!!"
2 :
the kind that know dropping a nuke in the middle east will set one billion Muslims world wide against us, also the kind of fools that try not to kill civilians, I like how you blame it on the liberals, like the conservatives didn't spend the last 6 years in charge. Even Bush isn't that crazy.
3 :
If people of your ilk made the decisions the world would have been destroyed by now. Thank God you can only post your ridiculous dribble on an Internet list services.
4 :
A few years ago I read a statement by a Central (global) banker. He said "down with the west and up with the east". I think this country is being brought down by design. Now look at China.
5 :
Nobody is arguing you are a fool The world has changed, the good guys mix with the bad, you can fire a big shotgun, but you'll hit your kids at the same time You want to live your life in combat gear with rifle cocked go ahead, I live in Canada. Where our biggest fear is nuclear winds blowing north Try respecting other people, the way you would with your next door neighbor, maybe they all won't want to kill you
6 :
I don't think we should go around nuking people; however, you should direct your questions to those people that believe the "Peace, not War" slogan...who believe certain things are "inhumane". This is war folks! It's not pretty...there are no rules in war. There is no reasoning with the kind of people we are fighting against. They are not the kind of people that will sit down and have a cup of coffee with you and discuss worldly matters in a rational way. They are terrorists!
7 :
Yep. We could take out the whole world - wait for the dust to settle, then move in. If we are not going to do it right - let's stay home and wait for the next attack so we can all huddle around the television waving American flags and talking about how terrible they are. Let's have a few weeks of resolve and pull together as a nation each time they blow something up on our homeland, and then casually slip back into the Barry Bonds steroid debate at home, while the liberals ensure the deaths of young blood so that they can say "Bring our boys home" and laugh all the way to the ballot box. On Sept. 7th, 2007 a judge in this country will announce a several billion dollar judgment against Iran for killing 241 Americans in 1983 in Beirut Lebanon. The American government will then use tax payer money to fight against the families of the dead from collecting the Iranian assets. So we can't use the courts to fight... And certain politicians tie our hands every time we need a decisive victory. Bush had it right with "Shock and awe." But eventually we changed it to "wait and cry." I say we start by taking France... and Quebec (so the Canadians know we aren't playing). Great question. You are not alone...
8 :
We seem to be God fearing, everyday fools. Hoping foolishly that someday, just someday, we can all live happily ever after, After what, who knows, But God will see us thru.
9 :
well nuke fools... u cant solve problems with nuclear weapons jus using one will have complications with everything wut happens of other pple from countries were killed in the blast? im sure those countries wether allies or enemies will want someone to pay heavily/ and answer up to them. Not to mention a nation has no right to kill so many pple i mean i dont mind war its neccesary but nuclear war creates more complications than it solves and thus jus screwing things up even more. The UN would have a crazy fit and i dont think u want the entire security council against us bc jus china alone has more man power than us lol and i dont feel like being overrun with them bc some fool wanted to push the button... (o and we didnt have a nuclear arsenal at the time hiroshima we had only made 2 weapons total, one made from uranium and one made from plutonium so we were actually jus bluffing the japs bout more bombs wouldve taken us a good while to refine more material)
10 :
Big fools it seems
11 :
Well, they kill us because we kill them, And we kill them because they kill us, And they kill us because we kill them....... mmhhmm, I see a pattern here. I'm not trying to justify their actions, but these days I'm having difficulty justifying ours. I mean, why are we STILL in Iraq? Why, because there is oil there. That is the only reason. Look at how little attention we are paying to similar things happening in Africa. Why, because they don't have oil. We really don't care about the people of Iraq or their civil rights, we just want a government that is "friendly" to us. I'd be curious to see how things would change were they to discover a huge deposit of oil in Somalia. Your solution would neither be practical nor advisable. Besides, why nuke places and release dangerous radiation when we can do it with conventional means. We have the ability to quash these countries, we just don't have the "cajones". We worry too much about collateral damage and how it will be played in the press. And that is why we will never really win. Until we are willing to take the political "hit" for what it takes to get the job done, we will continue to have more Vietnams, Koreas and Iraqs.
12 :
See that sort of talk from Americans is exactly why other countries have developed nuclear weapons, and America is the only country that has actually used them so far. *
13 :
NOT!
14 :
America lost the will to go to war in the Vietnam War thanks to hippies spouting 'love not war' etc. They failed to realize that as it takes two to fight, it also takes two to make peace. When one doesn't want peace it's hard to create a lasting peace for everyone.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 3000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
To quote Slim Pickens," YEEEEEEHAAAAAAWWWWW!!!"
2 :
the kind that know dropping a nuke in the middle east will set one billion Muslims world wide against us, also the kind of fools that try not to kill civilians, I like how you blame it on the liberals, like the conservatives didn't spend the last 6 years in charge. Even Bush isn't that crazy.
3 :
If people of your ilk made the decisions the world would have been destroyed by now. Thank God you can only post your ridiculous dribble on an Internet list services.
4 :
A few years ago I read a statement by a Central (global) banker. He said "down with the west and up with the east". I think this country is being brought down by design. Now look at China.
5 :
Nobody is arguing you are a fool The world has changed, the good guys mix with the bad, you can fire a big shotgun, but you'll hit your kids at the same time You want to live your life in combat gear with rifle cocked go ahead, I live in Canada. Where our biggest fear is nuclear winds blowing north Try respecting other people, the way you would with your next door neighbor, maybe they all won't want to kill you
6 :
I don't think we should go around nuking people; however, you should direct your questions to those people that believe the "Peace, not War" slogan...who believe certain things are "inhumane". This is war folks! It's not pretty...there are no rules in war. There is no reasoning with the kind of people we are fighting against. They are not the kind of people that will sit down and have a cup of coffee with you and discuss worldly matters in a rational way. They are terrorists!
7 :
Yep. We could take out the whole world - wait for the dust to settle, then move in. If we are not going to do it right - let's stay home and wait for the next attack so we can all huddle around the television waving American flags and talking about how terrible they are. Let's have a few weeks of resolve and pull together as a nation each time they blow something up on our homeland, and then casually slip back into the Barry Bonds steroid debate at home, while the liberals ensure the deaths of young blood so that they can say "Bring our boys home" and laugh all the way to the ballot box. On Sept. 7th, 2007 a judge in this country will announce a several billion dollar judgment against Iran for killing 241 Americans in 1983 in Beirut Lebanon. The American government will then use tax payer money to fight against the families of the dead from collecting the Iranian assets. So we can't use the courts to fight... And certain politicians tie our hands every time we need a decisive victory. Bush had it right with "Shock and awe." But eventually we changed it to "wait and cry." I say we start by taking France... and Quebec (so the Canadians know we aren't playing). Great question. You are not alone...
8 :
We seem to be God fearing, everyday fools. Hoping foolishly that someday, just someday, we can all live happily ever after, After what, who knows, But God will see us thru.
9 :
well nuke fools... u cant solve problems with nuclear weapons jus using one will have complications with everything wut happens of other pple from countries were killed in the blast? im sure those countries wether allies or enemies will want someone to pay heavily/ and answer up to them. Not to mention a nation has no right to kill so many pple i mean i dont mind war its neccesary but nuclear war creates more complications than it solves and thus jus screwing things up even more. The UN would have a crazy fit and i dont think u want the entire security council against us bc jus china alone has more man power than us lol and i dont feel like being overrun with them bc some fool wanted to push the button... (o and we didnt have a nuclear arsenal at the time hiroshima we had only made 2 weapons total, one made from uranium and one made from plutonium so we were actually jus bluffing the japs bout more bombs wouldve taken us a good while to refine more material)
10 :
Big fools it seems
11 :
Well, they kill us because we kill them, And we kill them because they kill us, And they kill us because we kill them....... mmhhmm, I see a pattern here. I'm not trying to justify their actions, but these days I'm having difficulty justifying ours. I mean, why are we STILL in Iraq? Why, because there is oil there. That is the only reason. Look at how little attention we are paying to similar things happening in Africa. Why, because they don't have oil. We really don't care about the people of Iraq or their civil rights, we just want a government that is "friendly" to us. I'd be curious to see how things would change were they to discover a huge deposit of oil in Somalia. Your solution would neither be practical nor advisable. Besides, why nuke places and release dangerous radiation when we can do it with conventional means. We have the ability to quash these countries, we just don't have the "cajones". We worry too much about collateral damage and how it will be played in the press. And that is why we will never really win. Until we are willing to take the political "hit" for what it takes to get the job done, we will continue to have more Vietnams, Koreas and Iraqs.
12 :
See that sort of talk from Americans is exactly why other countries have developed nuclear weapons, and America is the only country that has actually used them so far. *
13 :
NOT!
14 :
America lost the will to go to war in the Vietnam War thanks to hippies spouting 'love not war' etc. They failed to realize that as it takes two to fight, it also takes two to make peace. When one doesn't want peace it's hard to create a lasting peace for everyone.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
how do i download
how do i download?
garage band for free? which website do i go to?(is it even possible to use garage band in microsoft? i think it should.. since itunes works perfectly fine .. but again,im not an expert) thanks! ( i also heard of monaco... is it out yet? if so, were can i download it?)
Music & Music Players - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
give this a try
garage band for free? which website do i go to?(is it even possible to use garage band in microsoft? i think it should.. since itunes works perfectly fine .. but again,im not an expert) thanks! ( i also heard of monaco... is it out yet? if so, were can i download it?)
Music & Music Players - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
give this a try
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Working at Clothing stores
Working at Clothing stores?
I've been applying to a lot of clothing stores recently for a summer job, but hopefully I will be able to keep it part time in the fall. I've been applying to be a sales associate. I have no retail experience, but I do have A LOT of experience working with children and people in general, and I like to think I have a good eye and understanding of fashion. I've had luck at Old Navy, but they weren't paying what I was hoping for. For anyone in the retail world do you think I would have a chance at these other stores I applied to without retail experience? Zara Anthropologie H&M Gap Banana Republic Club Monaco Express The Limited New York and Company Victoria's Secret LUSH American Eagle BCBGMAXAZRIA Forever21 Thank you! Also if you have ever worked for any of these companies what did you think of them?
Fashion & Accessories - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Some of the more well-known brands can be pretty picky when choosing staff as they have alot of people wanting to work for them! so my advice would be too apply at smaller local boutiques and clothing stores even if youre not getting payed as much its worth it because experience is everything if youve got a lot of previous work in stores they would be much happier to accept you but you never know they might accept you without it but id definitly try to get some work elsewhere first goodluck! :)
2 :
Personally you might have a chance with all of them, but you never know what they are all looking for. All of the jobs I have had have been retail so I have a lot of retail experience, and I have also worked at Victoria's Secret. When there were times I needed and I applied to a lot of retail store, some which are on your list I didn't even get calls back from a lot of them so its not always about retail experience. I think that with VS you would have a good chance. I had a group interview with them and many of the girls didn't have any retail experience but as long as they had a wide enough schedule to be available they were hired. Express I didn't work there but had a interview with them and I think that they are pretty hard to get a job with. I know they base a lot of their choices on clothing since they are a high fashion store and probably on your experience. I have been applying at Express for the longest and just recently got an interview but didn't get the job so that one may be tough. Forever 21 I believe you could get a job at as long as you have a good working background. Just recently a 2 story Forever 21 opened up where I attend school at and they had open interviews on my campus and literally hired EVERYONE I even got the job but just didn't make the orientation. So that one may be really easy. As far as the other ones I don't know, but I do hope I helped in some way!
3 :
If you don't have any retail experience then that has to be your first goal. You should take the job at Old Navy and build up your experience for your CV. Once you've got a history/track record of working in retail the 'bigger brand' stores should be more willing to hire you. That said you should also be looking for Fashion Jobs/Retail Jobs in as many different places as possible, you never know what you might find...
I've been applying to a lot of clothing stores recently for a summer job, but hopefully I will be able to keep it part time in the fall. I've been applying to be a sales associate. I have no retail experience, but I do have A LOT of experience working with children and people in general, and I like to think I have a good eye and understanding of fashion. I've had luck at Old Navy, but they weren't paying what I was hoping for. For anyone in the retail world do you think I would have a chance at these other stores I applied to without retail experience? Zara Anthropologie H&M Gap Banana Republic Club Monaco Express The Limited New York and Company Victoria's Secret LUSH American Eagle BCBGMAXAZRIA Forever21 Thank you! Also if you have ever worked for any of these companies what did you think of them?
Fashion & Accessories - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Some of the more well-known brands can be pretty picky when choosing staff as they have alot of people wanting to work for them! so my advice would be too apply at smaller local boutiques and clothing stores even if youre not getting payed as much its worth it because experience is everything if youve got a lot of previous work in stores they would be much happier to accept you but you never know they might accept you without it but id definitly try to get some work elsewhere first goodluck! :)
2 :
Personally you might have a chance with all of them, but you never know what they are all looking for. All of the jobs I have had have been retail so I have a lot of retail experience, and I have also worked at Victoria's Secret. When there were times I needed and I applied to a lot of retail store, some which are on your list I didn't even get calls back from a lot of them so its not always about retail experience. I think that with VS you would have a good chance. I had a group interview with them and many of the girls didn't have any retail experience but as long as they had a wide enough schedule to be available they were hired. Express I didn't work there but had a interview with them and I think that they are pretty hard to get a job with. I know they base a lot of their choices on clothing since they are a high fashion store and probably on your experience. I have been applying at Express for the longest and just recently got an interview but didn't get the job so that one may be tough. Forever 21 I believe you could get a job at as long as you have a good working background. Just recently a 2 story Forever 21 opened up where I attend school at and they had open interviews on my campus and literally hired EVERYONE I even got the job but just didn't make the orientation. So that one may be really easy. As far as the other ones I don't know, but I do hope I helped in some way!
3 :
If you don't have any retail experience then that has to be your first goal. You should take the job at Old Navy and build up your experience for your CV. Once you've got a history/track record of working in retail the 'bigger brand' stores should be more willing to hire you. That said you should also be looking for Fashion Jobs/Retail Jobs in as many different places as possible, you never know what you might find...
Friday, October 1, 2010
is there any chance of me getitng hired when
is there any chance of me getitng hired when?
i never had a real job and I am 20 yrs old and a college student. In high school I had done volunteer work like file papers & stuffing envelopes for a year thats the only experience i had. I had applied many jobs before drug stores, clothing stores and nothing. I am going to try again. this week there’s going to be open house interviews in the city. - club Monaco ( fashion clothing store looking for stylists and stock ) - DSW ( shoe store / sales & stocks) - forever 21 ( store hasn’t open yet so they are looking for employers) Is there any chance that any of these stores would hire me. I know that these stores hire good looking people so I don’t have a problem with that , I am attractive lol . It is true this is how these stores do business. But beside that what kind of questions would they ask? How should I answer? How should I dress for each of these stores?
Marketing & Sales - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Each of these stores are fashioned oriented. so dress really nice. Remember to be conservative though. Limit jewelry and perfume. Do not show too much leg and no cleavage. Be freindly and outgoing. Ask them what you can do to get the job. They are all going to ask you why you want to work there. They will also ask what can you contibute to their store. Be honest and straight forward. Look them in the eye and give a firm hand shake. Sit up straight and show interest in what they are saying. Let them know you will wear their product and all your freinds and family will notice. Tell them you are customer oriented and love helping people. Good luck.
i never had a real job and I am 20 yrs old and a college student. In high school I had done volunteer work like file papers & stuffing envelopes for a year thats the only experience i had. I had applied many jobs before drug stores, clothing stores and nothing. I am going to try again. this week there’s going to be open house interviews in the city. - club Monaco ( fashion clothing store looking for stylists and stock ) - DSW ( shoe store / sales & stocks) - forever 21 ( store hasn’t open yet so they are looking for employers) Is there any chance that any of these stores would hire me. I know that these stores hire good looking people so I don’t have a problem with that , I am attractive lol . It is true this is how these stores do business. But beside that what kind of questions would they ask? How should I answer? How should I dress for each of these stores?
Marketing & Sales - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Each of these stores are fashioned oriented. so dress really nice. Remember to be conservative though. Limit jewelry and perfume. Do not show too much leg and no cleavage. Be freindly and outgoing. Ask them what you can do to get the job. They are all going to ask you why you want to work there. They will also ask what can you contibute to their store. Be honest and straight forward. Look them in the eye and give a firm hand shake. Sit up straight and show interest in what they are saying. Let them know you will wear their product and all your freinds and family will notice. Tell them you are customer oriented and love helping people. Good luck.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Should we nuke N Korea now or just sit here and wait for another pearl harbor or 9/11 before we do
Should we nuke N Korea now or just sit here and wait for another pearl harbor or 9/11 before we do?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
They will attack South Korea first
2 :
Excerpt: In April 2003, North Korea drew the obvious conclusion from the US and British aggression against Iraq. The war showed, it commented at the time, "that to allow disarmament through inspections does not help avert a war, but rather sparks it". Only "a tremendous military deterrent force", it stated with unavoidable logic, could prevent attacks on states the world's only superpower was determined to bring to heel. The lesson could not be clearer. Of Bush's "axis" states, Iraq, which had no weapons of mass destruction, was invaded and occupied; North Korea, which already had some nuclear capacity, was left untouched and is most unlikely to be attacked in future; while Iran, which has yet to develop a nuclear capability, is still threatened with aggression by both the US and Israel. After Iraq, It's Not Just North Korea that Wants a Bomb By Seumas Milne http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22734.htm
3 :
Hey, I know it would be satisfying on some level to obliterate the little schitz, but the nuclear radiation would travel to South Korea and kill them off slowly and painfully for generations, and even spread to Japan and China. So we really should use conventional bombs that would destroy our targets more locally, but I'd rather see China just take over and prop up a leader there.
4 :
They can't get the missiles past Japan............
5 :
What kind of fools are we? We're just an empty shell of what we once were. Solution to N.Korea: Nuke em. Now. Don't bother with allies. Just do it. Harry Truman would have the answer, and possibly - (here's where all hell on YA is going to break loose) - and possibly Richard Nixon. but alas, they're both gone, and the empty shell is starting to crack. Nuke em.
6 :
I agree with you,but we will do nothing till they start it,sad.The 1st bomb we should drop would be on Git mo.
7 :
NORTH KOREA IS A GREAT PLACE IT SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BUILD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, THE WEST SHOULD KEEP ITS NOSE OUT OF NORTH KOREA
8 :
The problem with nukes is this. You can't launch one, without resulting in the launch of many, many others, not only by the target nation, but by their allies, and any other nation nervous enough to think maybe they should. Launching just one nuke can very well lead to the destruction of the entire planet and everyone on it. Think of it this way. Your room mate is aggressive, and you're sure one day he'll attack you. Should you just pull the pin on that grenade now? That'll sure show him. Of course, it'll blow you to smithereens too, and accomplish your destruction probably better than anything he could accomplish. It brings "cutting off your nose to spite your face" to a whole new level. Outside of that. We learned, from WWII, that killing civilians isn't the way. Let's face it, if your mother in law curses you out, do you go outside and beat up the neighbor?
9 :
Yes. They are insane and are taking it way to far and it almost seems like no other communist or terrorist nation understands the power behind a nuke and how they will eventually kill themselves if enough are launched. I really dont understand how N Korea plans to nuke S Korea and escape the radiation because there pretty damn close to eachother. Anyways, i believe it's time that we we use what we have just like we did on Japan, becuase, yes it killed thousands of people, but it also sent them a a huge message of not to fuck with us because we just took out two of your cities and 100,000of you people and that message has faded away since the 40's and needs to be re-sent to N Korea and i gaurentee after we hit Pyongyang with one bomb, they will be so scared shitless and realize that there bombs are nothing to the 70 years in the making of ours and so will the Middle East once they realize were not fucking around anymore and no more "Military Rules" to follow, they will all turn democratic with out us even asking them to. Pretty sure that if we had a UN meeting with all the allies we could figure something out. Peace.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
They will attack South Korea first
2 :
Excerpt: In April 2003, North Korea drew the obvious conclusion from the US and British aggression against Iraq. The war showed, it commented at the time, "that to allow disarmament through inspections does not help avert a war, but rather sparks it". Only "a tremendous military deterrent force", it stated with unavoidable logic, could prevent attacks on states the world's only superpower was determined to bring to heel. The lesson could not be clearer. Of Bush's "axis" states, Iraq, which had no weapons of mass destruction, was invaded and occupied; North Korea, which already had some nuclear capacity, was left untouched and is most unlikely to be attacked in future; while Iran, which has yet to develop a nuclear capability, is still threatened with aggression by both the US and Israel. After Iraq, It's Not Just North Korea that Wants a Bomb By Seumas Milne http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22734.htm
3 :
Hey, I know it would be satisfying on some level to obliterate the little schitz, but the nuclear radiation would travel to South Korea and kill them off slowly and painfully for generations, and even spread to Japan and China. So we really should use conventional bombs that would destroy our targets more locally, but I'd rather see China just take over and prop up a leader there.
4 :
They can't get the missiles past Japan............
5 :
What kind of fools are we? We're just an empty shell of what we once were. Solution to N.Korea: Nuke em. Now. Don't bother with allies. Just do it. Harry Truman would have the answer, and possibly - (here's where all hell on YA is going to break loose) - and possibly Richard Nixon. but alas, they're both gone, and the empty shell is starting to crack. Nuke em.
6 :
I agree with you,but we will do nothing till they start it,sad.The 1st bomb we should drop would be on Git mo.
7 :
NORTH KOREA IS A GREAT PLACE IT SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BUILD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, THE WEST SHOULD KEEP ITS NOSE OUT OF NORTH KOREA
8 :
The problem with nukes is this. You can't launch one, without resulting in the launch of many, many others, not only by the target nation, but by their allies, and any other nation nervous enough to think maybe they should. Launching just one nuke can very well lead to the destruction of the entire planet and everyone on it. Think of it this way. Your room mate is aggressive, and you're sure one day he'll attack you. Should you just pull the pin on that grenade now? That'll sure show him. Of course, it'll blow you to smithereens too, and accomplish your destruction probably better than anything he could accomplish. It brings "cutting off your nose to spite your face" to a whole new level. Outside of that. We learned, from WWII, that killing civilians isn't the way. Let's face it, if your mother in law curses you out, do you go outside and beat up the neighbor?
9 :
Yes. They are insane and are taking it way to far and it almost seems like no other communist or terrorist nation understands the power behind a nuke and how they will eventually kill themselves if enough are launched. I really dont understand how N Korea plans to nuke S Korea and escape the radiation because there pretty damn close to eachother. Anyways, i believe it's time that we we use what we have just like we did on Japan, becuase, yes it killed thousands of people, but it also sent them a a huge message of not to fuck with us because we just took out two of your cities and 100,000of you people and that message has faded away since the 40's and needs to be re-sent to N Korea and i gaurentee after we hit Pyongyang with one bomb, they will be so scared shitless and realize that there bombs are nothing to the 70 years in the making of ours and so will the Middle East once they realize were not fucking around anymore and no more "Military Rules" to follow, they will all turn democratic with out us even asking them to. Pretty sure that if we had a UN meeting with all the allies we could figure something out. Peace.
Tuesday, September 14, 2010
Where will we hide after Al Queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and grabs their nukes
Where will we hide after Al Queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and grabs their nukes?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Reverend Wright's church.
2 :
I wish there was a way to blow them all to smithereens before somthing like that happens. Probly will be Obama pressing the button against us, I wouldn't doubt it...
3 :
Not enough Fat Cats would make $$ if we used nukes.The war in the Middle East is meant to be drawn out.The war over their is making some people VERY rich!!They are looking to cash in on Iran next.......................
4 :
Don't you think if the other guy's fallout from nukes will go back onto them that ours wouldn't come back on to us!? We may be fools to some extent...we are human, prone to make mistakes. the actual use of nukes anywhere is only a dooms day devise for everyone, so our best hope is to try to contain these rogue nations by means other than nuclear power... .....yet, your concern of the Al Queda threat is a clear and present danger...and how to end this threat is going to take some drastic measures and probably one we don't want to take but might have to.... God Forbid!
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Reverend Wright's church.
2 :
I wish there was a way to blow them all to smithereens before somthing like that happens. Probly will be Obama pressing the button against us, I wouldn't doubt it...
3 :
Not enough Fat Cats would make $$ if we used nukes.The war in the Middle East is meant to be drawn out.The war over their is making some people VERY rich!!They are looking to cash in on Iran next.......................
4 :
Don't you think if the other guy's fallout from nukes will go back onto them that ours wouldn't come back on to us!? We may be fools to some extent...we are human, prone to make mistakes. the actual use of nukes anywhere is only a dooms day devise for everyone, so our best hope is to try to contain these rogue nations by means other than nuclear power... .....yet, your concern of the Al Queda threat is a clear and present danger...and how to end this threat is going to take some drastic measures and probably one we don't want to take but might have to.... God Forbid!
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
What must we do to make america wake up and come to its senses
What must we do to make america wake up and come to its senses?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 13 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Well. The first thing to do is look up in the sky. Look for a twinkle twinkle shining little star. Make sure it's a guiding star. That's burning bright. At the moment. We can't see it under the cloud. Luke 6.39-40,41-45,46-49 What do you think?
2 :
When you start dropping these "nukes"will you be ready for the thousands of American casualties when the retaliation starts?
3 :
You are the kind of fool that needs to study history a bit more before panicking like a big girls blouse....I'm sure I've answered this very question before so I'm not going to go over it again... Suffice to say nukes are not the answer...
4 :
We aren't loosing we have done some amazing things in Iraq.They (the Media) just don't show the good.It don't sell !People like groce it sucks but its true.We are way ahead and are preparing for the defense against Iran.
5 :
Like Big Steve says, we are not losing, we will if we vote in Obama (or even worse if that fool hillary gets in)
6 :
you must feel very proud when your soldiers killed thousands of innocent lives in east asia. very good. now imagine if someone would drop A bomb in new york or washington on your innocent people. how would you feel? americans are cowards. japanese surrendered cause they care more about their people. wouldnt you surrender if someone would drop a bomb on your family living peacefully in some american city? you'll never win this war against terrorism anyway. what are americans thinking? that if they go around the world playing superheros that they'll magically get peace? you are far away from peace. the world hates you in middle east, in sweden, in germany, in russia, in asia, especially in africa. look at the darfur crisis. how many soldiers did your government send there when they also need protection? I'm not surprised when people are yelling "death to america". look at what are you doing, you go somewhere, bomb many innocent lives, come home like some superheros and then you are crying why everyone hates you.
7 :
I see you have an even more warmongering bent than the present incumbent.OK so say you do start spewing nukes all round the globe at supposed enemies do you seriously think America would not get one dropped on it from another nuclear power not prepared to wait and see if they'll be next.What worked years ago won't wash now as other nations have nuclear capabilities and thanks to the Yanks interference globally they are all too jittery to hold back.What do you propose after America and your enemies have been nuked?A victory dance? Nuclear war means the end of us all,no winners just losers.China's spending billions on a nuclear sub fleet at this very minute.Accept the fact that America is not going to be ruling the roost any more and anyway any trouble it gets is usually of its own making because it refuses to keep it's nose out of other countries affairs and goes around destabilising nations covertly in order to get an excuse to start trouble. What kind of fools are you?Some of you are warmongering fools whose actions and words just make the world more unsafe.You are the world's bully and you try to pretend you're the good guy.Pfft!
8 :
All I can say is I'm glad you're not running things, because I'd kiss my azzzz goodbye along with everyone else I know. =============== Life is so simple, but we insist on making it complicated Confucius 551 - 479 BC =============== Peace Jim .
9 :
look inward
10 :
Untrammelled US power, maintained by the threat of nuclear annihilation for the rest of us if we don't buy into the American version of 'democracy' and economics? No thanks, matey. Full spectrum dominance - you can shove it right up yer Gary.
11 :
Dude check this one out! I was watching Fox News yesterday! A congressman said : When he was 9 years old.. his house was bombed! Because of his father's position! Anyways make this story short!! He said in the 60's, a group called (something like) Weather gang? Anyways this gang went too prison! Now out!! 1. Obama when he announced.. I'm running for president.. guess what.. His 1st party was at the Weather gangs house! What the heck does it take people too stop being so stupid! OMG!! Yeah your right No we must not stop!! Sure come home and regroup! The world is crazy!! have fun!
12 :
DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO AMERICAN TERRORISM LONG LIVE PEACE !!!
13 :
someone eventually will.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 13 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Well. The first thing to do is look up in the sky. Look for a twinkle twinkle shining little star. Make sure it's a guiding star. That's burning bright. At the moment. We can't see it under the cloud. Luke 6.39-40,41-45,46-49 What do you think?
2 :
When you start dropping these "nukes"will you be ready for the thousands of American casualties when the retaliation starts?
3 :
You are the kind of fool that needs to study history a bit more before panicking like a big girls blouse....I'm sure I've answered this very question before so I'm not going to go over it again... Suffice to say nukes are not the answer...
4 :
We aren't loosing we have done some amazing things in Iraq.They (the Media) just don't show the good.It don't sell !People like groce it sucks but its true.We are way ahead and are preparing for the defense against Iran.
5 :
Like Big Steve says, we are not losing, we will if we vote in Obama (or even worse if that fool hillary gets in)
6 :
you must feel very proud when your soldiers killed thousands of innocent lives in east asia. very good. now imagine if someone would drop A bomb in new york or washington on your innocent people. how would you feel? americans are cowards. japanese surrendered cause they care more about their people. wouldnt you surrender if someone would drop a bomb on your family living peacefully in some american city? you'll never win this war against terrorism anyway. what are americans thinking? that if they go around the world playing superheros that they'll magically get peace? you are far away from peace. the world hates you in middle east, in sweden, in germany, in russia, in asia, especially in africa. look at the darfur crisis. how many soldiers did your government send there when they also need protection? I'm not surprised when people are yelling "death to america". look at what are you doing, you go somewhere, bomb many innocent lives, come home like some superheros and then you are crying why everyone hates you.
7 :
I see you have an even more warmongering bent than the present incumbent.OK so say you do start spewing nukes all round the globe at supposed enemies do you seriously think America would not get one dropped on it from another nuclear power not prepared to wait and see if they'll be next.What worked years ago won't wash now as other nations have nuclear capabilities and thanks to the Yanks interference globally they are all too jittery to hold back.What do you propose after America and your enemies have been nuked?A victory dance? Nuclear war means the end of us all,no winners just losers.China's spending billions on a nuclear sub fleet at this very minute.Accept the fact that America is not going to be ruling the roost any more and anyway any trouble it gets is usually of its own making because it refuses to keep it's nose out of other countries affairs and goes around destabilising nations covertly in order to get an excuse to start trouble. What kind of fools are you?Some of you are warmongering fools whose actions and words just make the world more unsafe.You are the world's bully and you try to pretend you're the good guy.Pfft!
8 :
All I can say is I'm glad you're not running things, because I'd kiss my azzzz goodbye along with everyone else I know. =============== Life is so simple, but we insist on making it complicated Confucius 551 - 479 BC =============== Peace Jim .
9 :
look inward
10 :
Untrammelled US power, maintained by the threat of nuclear annihilation for the rest of us if we don't buy into the American version of 'democracy' and economics? No thanks, matey. Full spectrum dominance - you can shove it right up yer Gary.
11 :
Dude check this one out! I was watching Fox News yesterday! A congressman said : When he was 9 years old.. his house was bombed! Because of his father's position! Anyways make this story short!! He said in the 60's, a group called (something like) Weather gang? Anyways this gang went too prison! Now out!! 1. Obama when he announced.. I'm running for president.. guess what.. His 1st party was at the Weather gangs house! What the heck does it take people too stop being so stupid! OMG!! Yeah your right No we must not stop!! Sure come home and regroup! The world is crazy!! have fun!
12 :
DEATH TO AMERICA DEATH TO AMERICAN TERRORISM LONG LIVE PEACE !!!
13 :
someone eventually will.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Are we fools or just plan stupid
Are we fools or just plan stupid?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we are just stupid fools
2 :
We are fucking idiots!
3 :
it would appear that common sense and decency have developed a gulf it is disgusting the way these murderers are allowed to sue ..... they can't be sent back to their own countries because they might be ill treated - yet they don't mind murdering people in the land they have sought refuge in we have listened for too long to the pc people who are frightened to offend these thugs and murderers don't mind offending or killing us .....
4 :
Sorry guy but were the smarter fool if we hold the nukes till it's right, it's not right now nor any of the other wars you named, random killing is the most foolish and dumbest! hope this helps to clear this up for you
5 :
If the people of this country elect a lib to the Oval office, you will have the proof, that they are fools. The libs want to run and hide, but the terrorist will follow them home.
6 :
big ones.
7 :
you can not bomb a religion or a religious idea rather simple fact you seem to not see. By the way the A bomb killed lots of Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, South Africans. Not known how many but more than died in the normal bombing raids.
8 :
we are just plain stupid fools.
9 :
Using nukes is a dangerous thing, it can contaminate many countries who are not involved. Look what happened when Chernobyl had their leak, there are still parts of the UK that are still affected by the fallout. Anyway the time will come for you and probably quite soon, when the US will attack Iran, now that will be a war for you, I believe a third of the US will be completely devastated.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 9 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we are just stupid fools
2 :
We are fucking idiots!
3 :
it would appear that common sense and decency have developed a gulf it is disgusting the way these murderers are allowed to sue ..... they can't be sent back to their own countries because they might be ill treated - yet they don't mind murdering people in the land they have sought refuge in we have listened for too long to the pc people who are frightened to offend these thugs and murderers don't mind offending or killing us .....
4 :
Sorry guy but were the smarter fool if we hold the nukes till it's right, it's not right now nor any of the other wars you named, random killing is the most foolish and dumbest! hope this helps to clear this up for you
5 :
If the people of this country elect a lib to the Oval office, you will have the proof, that they are fools. The libs want to run and hide, but the terrorist will follow them home.
6 :
big ones.
7 :
you can not bomb a religion or a religious idea rather simple fact you seem to not see. By the way the A bomb killed lots of Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, South Africans. Not known how many but more than died in the normal bombing raids.
8 :
we are just plain stupid fools.
9 :
Using nukes is a dangerous thing, it can contaminate many countries who are not involved. Look what happened when Chernobyl had their leak, there are still parts of the UK that are still affected by the fallout. Anyway the time will come for you and probably quite soon, when the US will attack Iran, now that will be a war for you, I believe a third of the US will be completely devastated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)