Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we? TO KARINA: Why dont you stick your head in the ground and leave it there? If it cant work above ground, maybe it will work as fertilizer.
Military - 12 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we are puppets being controlled by an idiot
2 :
merely fools
3 :
foolish idiots
4 :
You are neither a fool nor an idiot.
5 :
we are idiot fools.
6 :
Let's have fun and everyone pick one reason why this is obviously not an American. We never refer to ourselves as "Yanks"
7 :
If it is SG, both.
8 :
You are are a fool and an idiot but really you are deeply evil and Satanic. The US did worse than the Nazis. We killed millions of people in Iraq and over 12 million in Afghanistan. We made hundreds of millions of people homeless. We contaminated their land with radioactive waste. We denied them food and water. Anyone who thinks the US is right is a devil. Before we invaded Afghanistan, before 9/11, the US had already murdered over a million Iraqi infants and hundreds of thousands of Afghanis simply by declaring an embargo against their country and not allowing them to get any food except for in Iraq under Hussein they got two tablespoons of lentils as rations per day. Now they get nothing. Kabul alone is filled with tens of thousands of orphan children sleeping in the street eating garbage. Because of you. People like you. Racist murderer killers like you. By the way this question was posted yesterday so you are probably right, commenter. It's not an American. It's an Israeli spy trying to get Americans to commit suicide for Israel.
9 :
If you are going to criticize the Liberals about not attacking China with atomic bombs,you forgot that the goal was to contain the conflict. You conveniently forgot that President George Herbert Walker Bush decided not to go after Saddam Hussein and stopped after Kuwait was liberated since they did not have plans beyond a goal they met. Presidents Harry Truman and George Herbert Walker Bush ARE combat veterans and know the ugly side of war that war hawks glorify. Atomic weapons sterilize the area that it takes time for people to return, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As for 9-11 there is no proof of why World Trade Center building 7 went down since it was not hit by the two jets. Also there are no plane parts shown for evidence from the attack on the Pentagon. Why were the video tapes confiscated and not shown ?
10 :
I don't know about the "we" in your question - who gave you the right to speak for such a lot of people? - but I do know that You (and apparently you have some company judging from some of these answers) are an idiot and a fool who apparently does not understand the nuclear bomb's power and the side effects of turning them loose. Perhaps had you spent the time reading up on it instead of writing this long monologue of hate and power mongering, you would know. I have given you a place to start but Google has hundreds of thousands of pages on the subject.
11 :
You have no concept about the tactics used in this war. We are not facing massed troops with aerial and armored support. The enemy, the "hirabah", are gathered in small groups in a "Beyit Al Shuhada" (Martyrs House) to plot and carry out suicide missions, mostly against civilians and even their fellow Muslims. So, the tactics call for small unit involvement (platoon down to squad size) and also in urban environments, which is the most deadly to troops. Use of nuclear weapons in such a battle space would be the equivalent of using a piano for a paper weight. We did not go to war in Iraq in 1991. We were part of a UN Peace Enforcement Mission whose goal was to expel Iraqi troops from Kuwait and thereby restore the state of things which existed prior to Iraq's invasion of that Emirate. That was what was set forth in UN Security Council #789 and in House Concurrent Resolution #99 which authorized the use of U.S. troops to carry out that mission and to meet our obligation under Article 45 of the UN Charter.
12 :
I didn't read that because my attention span is not that long; however, i agree with what karina said
