Are we facing another 12/7/41 and 9/11/01 now that taliban is on outskirts of islamabad,eyeing their nukes?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? Do you really think the taliban picked the Pakistani border because the weather there is nice, or did they have another goal in setting up their operations there? When they grab Pakistan's nukes will we do something about it besides shaking an index finger at them? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yeah but it'll be 911 with knobs on it, armageddon. For the USA though, not the UK. IMHO
2 :
well with this administrating its possible they have already proved that by cutting defense .an thinking they can talk their way out of it .have giving our enemy courage to do it again .terrorist are murders they should be treated like one .not babied our security is at a low equal to that of 9 11 lets all pray that this does not happen !
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Thursday, April 14, 2011
I need a show name for my horse.
I need a show name for my horse.?
I have a 7 year old thoroughbred and I am going to show him this season. I need a show name for him and I am having trouble thinking of some. His name is Harley, and please no Harley Davidson I don’t really like that I want something that stands out preferable one word long. [Ex. Monaco, patron, [these are some horses show names at my barn] rocmadatous]. Please and Thanks. A little about my horse: he is 7 years and he’s is 16.3 hands tall and I need something manly hehe. we are currently working in our jumper phase and that’s what he will be in his future. he is a bay thoroughbred. Thanks for all your help. Here is a photo or two: [1] http://i39.tinypic.com/2edt7xv.jpg [2] http://i41.tinypic.com/2mcl7s.jpg
Horse Racing - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should name him Merlin. or Nostradamus. Your welcome.
2 :
Ahh, he's gorgeous. My sister has a Bay thoroughbred called Woody,he's 5 still still learning. The 1st thing that came into my head when I saw him was Samson.
3 :
It's a good thing you don't want Harley Davidson. Don't know about where you live but here is Australia we are not allowed to use names that are registered trade marks (eg. Gucci) or names of well-known horses, even if dead or retired (eg. Kibah Tic Toc) How about an animal name? One of friends has two hunters, one called Impala, the other is called Kestrel. So maybe Cormorant (a type of bird) or Raptor (birds of prey) Sorry, I'm a bird person. Can you tell?
4 :
Here Comes Trouble Fast and Furious Show Stopper Ima Fine Chunck of Metal You Just Got Harleyed Mr. Encore A Jump Over the Moon
5 :
He looks like a "scamanda"to me!!
6 :
He is a beautiful horse um... these may not be great but i like them(: Hotshot Aftershock Apache Sunrise Top of the Line Arizona Sunset Total Rebellion try this site: www.horses-and-horse-information.com/horsenames/a.shtml hope this helped a little
I have a 7 year old thoroughbred and I am going to show him this season. I need a show name for him and I am having trouble thinking of some. His name is Harley, and please no Harley Davidson I don’t really like that I want something that stands out preferable one word long. [Ex. Monaco, patron, [these are some horses show names at my barn] rocmadatous]. Please and Thanks. A little about my horse: he is 7 years and he’s is 16.3 hands tall and I need something manly hehe. we are currently working in our jumper phase and that’s what he will be in his future. he is a bay thoroughbred. Thanks for all your help. Here is a photo or two: [1] http://i39.tinypic.com/2edt7xv.jpg [2] http://i41.tinypic.com/2mcl7s.jpg
Horse Racing - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should name him Merlin. or Nostradamus. Your welcome.
2 :
Ahh, he's gorgeous. My sister has a Bay thoroughbred called Woody,he's 5 still still learning. The 1st thing that came into my head when I saw him was Samson.
3 :
It's a good thing you don't want Harley Davidson. Don't know about where you live but here is Australia we are not allowed to use names that are registered trade marks (eg. Gucci) or names of well-known horses, even if dead or retired (eg. Kibah Tic Toc) How about an animal name? One of friends has two hunters, one called Impala, the other is called Kestrel. So maybe Cormorant (a type of bird) or Raptor (birds of prey) Sorry, I'm a bird person. Can you tell?
4 :
Here Comes Trouble Fast and Furious Show Stopper Ima Fine Chunck of Metal You Just Got Harleyed Mr. Encore A Jump Over the Moon
5 :
He looks like a "scamanda"to me!!
6 :
He is a beautiful horse um... these may not be great but i like them(: Hotshot Aftershock Apache Sunrise Top of the Line Arizona Sunset Total Rebellion try this site: www.horses-and-horse-information.com/horsenames/a.shtml hope this helped a little
Thursday, April 7, 2011
What kind of fools are we
What kind of fools are we?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why did you post this twice? I'm not a fool.
2 :
Twice? He's posted it eight times in the last two days in different places.
3 :
Dude, you are a Nuker, for sure. Glad you are not in charge.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why did you post this twice? I'm not a fool.
2 :
Twice? He's posted it eight times in the last two days in different places.
3 :
Dude, you are a Nuker, for sure. Glad you are not in charge.
Friday, April 1, 2011
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice?
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together. One day last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I am sorry. =/ It is possible that she might just like the attention she is getting. I mean, what girl wouldn't like someone telling her she is beautiful? About what you could do, though, is possibly tell her how you're feeling. If that is too hard for you or too much right now, be extra careful on telling her how much you love her, think she is beautiful, and tell her how lucky you are. Make her feel special to have you, as well. Maybe take her to dinner, or even better, make her favourite meal. Just do little things to show her you love her. Good luck!!!
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together. One day last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I am sorry. =/ It is possible that she might just like the attention she is getting. I mean, what girl wouldn't like someone telling her she is beautiful? About what you could do, though, is possibly tell her how you're feeling. If that is too hard for you or too much right now, be extra careful on telling her how much you love her, think she is beautiful, and tell her how lucky you are. Make her feel special to have you, as well. Maybe take her to dinner, or even better, make her favourite meal. Just do little things to show her you love her. Good luck!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)