Hilary claims :"we cannot win this war." Is that so?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- We could have won in Korea with nuclear weapons, but liberals panicked the administration, claiming Russia would nuke us if we nuked Korea. The result: 33,000 yanks died, nukes stood idle, the war was a stalemate, and now Korea comes back with its own nukes, threatening us with them, which never would have happened had we nuked them when we had the chance. REAL REAL SMART. And here we sit like fools, as Iran and the rest of the Islamic gangs buy red mercury from the Russian mafia to make their own. Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? What kind of fools are we?
Other - Politics & Government - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We've been fighting in Iraq for years. Where are the Weapons of Mass Destruction? Where is Osama?
2 :
The fact that you repeatedly assert your opinion with the sarcastic follow up, "REAL SMART," and in the same sentence recommend the unreserved use of nuclear weapons against other nations destroys every ounce of whatever credibility you would otherwise have. If you think we can just conquer any dissentor with nuclear weapons without any retaliation, then you have some serious cognitive deficits regarding cause and effect. "Let's nuke them so that they can't nuke us!" Yeah. Real(ly) smart. We are not Ancient Rome, but we will fall as they did if we believe we really can weild the same power. Get a clue.
3 :
You can't possibly suggest that just because our "enemies" are evil barbarians that stop at nothing to dissuade us that somehow we should use their tactics? America is a leading country in human rights, that is something I am proud of. We can defeat the enemy while applying human rights, it will make it more difficult, but challenge is what makes us American. America is good because it is great. Once it stops being good, it will stop being great.
4 :
Yes. Korea, Vietnam. Soviet's war in Afganistan. Some people never learnt.
5 :
Do you always fight a war in the enemies backyard? Are you at war with all of the 3 billion muslums in the world? Or just the terrorists?
6 :
We can win it, but with the goverment, NO. Well..........I say we jsut bomb Iraq and Iran. If there are really innocent people, they should have left. Who wouldnt leave? If ur an innocent person in Iraq/Iran then you are STUPID. LEAVE.
7 :
i agree, i think hillary, bill, and bush should be locked in iran while we drop a hellfire brigade of nukes on the whole dang country! and all of its' dang mslims! shoot them all! bush is the devil! and if u r reading this i want u to take a moment os silence (as i am doing now) for people in the war cause of bush! he needs to be put in the guillotine!
8 :
The war was lost right after the invasion. No occupation plan. No good way out except to cut our losses and come home.
9 :
first of all my fellow American. you have to realize that no one has ever really won a war. its not possible to be victorious when so many people, whether they are American or the other, loose their lives over the idiots that represent our nations. yes, me might deplete their armies to point of submission but you can never change those people way of thinking. you mention vietnam. we had nothing to do with that. it was a civil war among that country. pearl harbor was a justified retaliation on japan for attacking us. All through your question, you mentioned "nukes" 15 times. If we shoot nukes, everybody is going to shoot nukes. dont think that these countrys are without nuclear arms just because the UN didnt find any or said to stop all nuclear production. Seems like you're looking for the end of the world to start by the very country you love so much. And Hilary is right. we cant win this war. it needs to come to an end. let no more of our troops die for one man's greed.
10 :
Are we winning now? Looks like she's right.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Are we fools or just plan idiots
Are we fools or just plan idiots?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
History - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We're not fools enough to tell the difference between a question and a rant.
2 :
Uhhhh, what? Please relax.The world is going to be here when you wake up tomorrow. Have some warm milk or an Ambien and go to bed.
3 :
Are you comparing Pearl Harbor and 9/11 here. I wouldn't say we sat around, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating. We fought a just and decisive war. I agree that we should actively pursue Al Queda and those that harbor them. But Al Queda is not a sovereign nation with territory we can invade so it's difficult to nuke them without risking war. I believe the situation calls for a little more tact than you or the current administration are calling for. Perhaps it is best left to the CIA, MI6, and black ops but of course we cannot allow state sponsored assassination. I don't believe the policy of invading countries where we suspect Al Queda activity is working very well. Afghanistan yes, we knew they were there, Iraq certainly not. We don't have troops for future ventures and our presence seems to irritate people. We need a better plan.
4 :
The purpose of the war in Iraq was to get rid of Saddam Husseuins' regime, which it did. it was not a war against the whole of iraq, which makes it a rather more complex affair than the war with Japan. The civil war that has erupted in Iraq is a terrible thing, but America is not at war with the whole country, or at least isn't supposed to be, so you can't start nuking them. The American and British forces in iraq are supoposed to be supportin the current Iraqui government, so how on earth can they start nuking Iraq without killing their allies a swell as their enemies?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
History - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We're not fools enough to tell the difference between a question and a rant.
2 :
Uhhhh, what? Please relax.The world is going to be here when you wake up tomorrow. Have some warm milk or an Ambien and go to bed.
3 :
Are you comparing Pearl Harbor and 9/11 here. I wouldn't say we sat around, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating. We fought a just and decisive war. I agree that we should actively pursue Al Queda and those that harbor them. But Al Queda is not a sovereign nation with territory we can invade so it's difficult to nuke them without risking war. I believe the situation calls for a little more tact than you or the current administration are calling for. Perhaps it is best left to the CIA, MI6, and black ops but of course we cannot allow state sponsored assassination. I don't believe the policy of invading countries where we suspect Al Queda activity is working very well. Afghanistan yes, we knew they were there, Iraq certainly not. We don't have troops for future ventures and our presence seems to irritate people. We need a better plan.
4 :
The purpose of the war in Iraq was to get rid of Saddam Husseuins' regime, which it did. it was not a war against the whole of iraq, which makes it a rather more complex affair than the war with Japan. The civil war that has erupted in Iraq is a terrible thing, but America is not at war with the whole country, or at least isn't supposed to be, so you can't start nuking them. The American and British forces in iraq are supoposed to be supportin the current Iraqui government, so how on earth can they start nuking Iraq without killing their allies a swell as their enemies?
Thursday, July 7, 2011
how to save money on a eurotrip
how to save money on a eurotrip?
so next summer, i'd love to go to europe with my dad for 3-4 weeks, specifically to french-speaking regions so i can practice my french (corsica, monaco, france, belgium, luxembourg, switzerland, etc.) and maybe even stop in london for a couple days for the olympics (although, please excuse my ignorance, i have noo idea how that works). i have relatives who live in la rochelle, france, and an exchange student who lives in bordeaux who we could stay with, but other than that, how can we save money? i'm thinking the hotel rooms and transportation are really going to make it expensive. any ideas?
Packing & Preparation - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Don't be too lavish. Please spend money for necessary things.
2 :
dont spend too much. budget your daily expense
3 :
Europe is generally very expensive you need to be basic about certain things try not spending too much on the hotel as most of the time you will be out shopping or sight seeing and just going to the hotel to sleep (i presume) secondly try to choose joints for eating that are affordable as good as the restaurants look from outside they may not have value for money so you can actually enter a supermarket and grab a decent bite for one meal and the other meal you can pop by in a near by cafe every second shop is either a restaurant or cafe so you will get an idea where you can grab a bite from thirdly try and book your train tickets and air tickets in advance to get the cheap fares esp for the trains thalys and eurostar have offers for early bookings and the rides are very very smooth all the best and enjoy yourself
4 :
I assume you are not European, if so, you will be able to get an Eurail pass, not an InterRail. The man in seat sixty-one has a good site with lots of information for you: http://www.seat61.com/ You 'should' read the page on France, the page on rail passes and maybe just roam around the site to see if there is something else you like to see. On the France page, (click on France in the bar on the left) you will see 'how to buy tickets' in the heading of the page, and How to travel from the UK to France, that info is as good for you as for people who start out in England. If you do decide for a rail pass, it is likely that a 3 countries Eurail Switzerland, France and Benelux will do. The UK is never included. Booking all your train travels early is likely cheaper but less flexible. On the French railway site you can book for all TGV trains as well as the Thalys and Eurostar, that are the high speed trains, and booking early you can save 50 to 90% of the price of tickets bought on the day of traveling. For cheap places to stay use one of the hostel booking sites, they also do cheap hotels and bed and breakfast kind of places. If you do not mind sharing a room with your dad you will often find hotels as cheap as two beds in a dorm in a hostel, but sometimes you will pay less when you go to hostels. France is a country to eat out, but hostels will allow you to do (part of) your own cooking. Cooked lunches in restaurants are often way cheaper than dinners, so if you want to eat out and still want to save money, go out for lunch and cook your own dinner. If you want to see some of the top games of the Olympics, you will have to apply for your tickets very soon, but often there will be sports that have games with tickets for sale when it is almost time for start.
5 :
Bonjour. Cheap Hotels: Formule 1, B'nB (Bed and Breakfast, that is the name of the hotels company) Cheap supermaket: Aldi, Lidl, Leader Price, Netto, Ed Transports: City bus and subway aren't expensive. Trains prices are decent. Plane: forget it! All of that is for France only (but you can find some of these companies over Europe).
so next summer, i'd love to go to europe with my dad for 3-4 weeks, specifically to french-speaking regions so i can practice my french (corsica, monaco, france, belgium, luxembourg, switzerland, etc.) and maybe even stop in london for a couple days for the olympics (although, please excuse my ignorance, i have noo idea how that works). i have relatives who live in la rochelle, france, and an exchange student who lives in bordeaux who we could stay with, but other than that, how can we save money? i'm thinking the hotel rooms and transportation are really going to make it expensive. any ideas?
Packing & Preparation - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Don't be too lavish. Please spend money for necessary things.
2 :
dont spend too much. budget your daily expense
3 :
Europe is generally very expensive you need to be basic about certain things try not spending too much on the hotel as most of the time you will be out shopping or sight seeing and just going to the hotel to sleep (i presume) secondly try to choose joints for eating that are affordable as good as the restaurants look from outside they may not have value for money so you can actually enter a supermarket and grab a decent bite for one meal and the other meal you can pop by in a near by cafe every second shop is either a restaurant or cafe so you will get an idea where you can grab a bite from thirdly try and book your train tickets and air tickets in advance to get the cheap fares esp for the trains thalys and eurostar have offers for early bookings and the rides are very very smooth all the best and enjoy yourself
4 :
I assume you are not European, if so, you will be able to get an Eurail pass, not an InterRail. The man in seat sixty-one has a good site with lots of information for you: http://www.seat61.com/ You 'should' read the page on France, the page on rail passes and maybe just roam around the site to see if there is something else you like to see. On the France page, (click on France in the bar on the left) you will see 'how to buy tickets' in the heading of the page, and How to travel from the UK to France, that info is as good for you as for people who start out in England. If you do decide for a rail pass, it is likely that a 3 countries Eurail Switzerland, France and Benelux will do. The UK is never included. Booking all your train travels early is likely cheaper but less flexible. On the French railway site you can book for all TGV trains as well as the Thalys and Eurostar, that are the high speed trains, and booking early you can save 50 to 90% of the price of tickets bought on the day of traveling. For cheap places to stay use one of the hostel booking sites, they also do cheap hotels and bed and breakfast kind of places. If you do not mind sharing a room with your dad you will often find hotels as cheap as two beds in a dorm in a hostel, but sometimes you will pay less when you go to hostels. France is a country to eat out, but hostels will allow you to do (part of) your own cooking. Cooked lunches in restaurants are often way cheaper than dinners, so if you want to eat out and still want to save money, go out for lunch and cook your own dinner. If you want to see some of the top games of the Olympics, you will have to apply for your tickets very soon, but often there will be sports that have games with tickets for sale when it is almost time for start.
5 :
Bonjour. Cheap Hotels: Formule 1, B'nB (Bed and Breakfast, that is the name of the hotels company) Cheap supermaket: Aldi, Lidl, Leader Price, Netto, Ed Transports: City bus and subway aren't expensive. Trains prices are decent. Plane: forget it! All of that is for France only (but you can find some of these companies over Europe).
Friday, July 1, 2011
How do you find the typical age of death for a population
How do you find the typical age of death for a population?
I have been using the CIA Factbook website for research and I am trying to understand how it works. I am looking at Burma. The average age is 26.5 years, while the life expectancy at birth is 64.52 years. What I want to know is, because of the military regime and the violence going on there, what is the average age of death? Is that the life expectancy? If so, does that mean that the average age of death for Angola is 38.76 years and for Monaco it's 89.73 years (I couldn't believe that last one myself!). In the United States the life expectancy at birth is 78.24 years, and I know there aren't that many old people rockin' around in the nursing homes. On the other hand, the average age can just indicate that the population is young. Perhaps the women in the country are feeling particularly fertile at the moment (In Niger the average age is 15.2 and the average number of kids per woman is 7.68. Can YOU imagine having an average of over seven kids in a household?!?!). So what gives? How can I figure out what effect the violence of the country has on the population? Here's the site: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
Sociology - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
the WHO has what they call the "Mortality Database" that looks to measure deathrates in various nations. You might try this.
I have been using the CIA Factbook website for research and I am trying to understand how it works. I am looking at Burma. The average age is 26.5 years, while the life expectancy at birth is 64.52 years. What I want to know is, because of the military regime and the violence going on there, what is the average age of death? Is that the life expectancy? If so, does that mean that the average age of death for Angola is 38.76 years and for Monaco it's 89.73 years (I couldn't believe that last one myself!). In the United States the life expectancy at birth is 78.24 years, and I know there aren't that many old people rockin' around in the nursing homes. On the other hand, the average age can just indicate that the population is young. Perhaps the women in the country are feeling particularly fertile at the moment (In Niger the average age is 15.2 and the average number of kids per woman is 7.68. Can YOU imagine having an average of over seven kids in a household?!?!). So what gives? How can I figure out what effect the violence of the country has on the population? Here's the site: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html
Sociology - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
the WHO has what they call the "Mortality Database" that looks to measure deathrates in various nations. You might try this.
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Diano marina/Genova/Italian Riviera weather in early Sept
Diano marina/Genova/Italian Riviera weather in early Sept?
Can anyone help me please? I am kinda desperate. Me and my hubby and 13 y.o. daughter want to go to Diano Marina, near Genova, Italy (near to the South of France/Monaco/Cannes etc,) from 30th August to 8th September. It's a good package with a popular Midlands Coach company, and it stops overnight in Dijon, which is fab coz it means no overnight coach travel - (been there done that yuk.) But this is the only date left with them though that isn't in mid summer. They have limited trips during the year (only about twelve...) And the two September ones (20th and 27th) are gone, as have the May and June ones... So we are left with the July and August ones only. I don't want it to be TOO hot. Would anyone have any clues as to what temperature we can/should expect around that date??? What would the weather at the *end* of August, when this date is, be like? Here's where it is. Hope this works...
Other - Europe - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Try this link: the weather in Genoa is pretty OK in late August and early September. Genoa is about 60 miles from Diano Marina, so I would imagine it would be very similar. You should be safe, as I don't see the weather going much above 85 F. http://insurance.essentialtravel.co.uk/tg-europe/italy/genoa-weather.asp
Can anyone help me please? I am kinda desperate. Me and my hubby and 13 y.o. daughter want to go to Diano Marina, near Genova, Italy (near to the South of France/Monaco/Cannes etc,) from 30th August to 8th September. It's a good package with a popular Midlands Coach company, and it stops overnight in Dijon, which is fab coz it means no overnight coach travel - (been there done that yuk.) But this is the only date left with them though that isn't in mid summer. They have limited trips during the year (only about twelve...) And the two September ones (20th and 27th) are gone, as have the May and June ones... So we are left with the July and August ones only. I don't want it to be TOO hot. Would anyone have any clues as to what temperature we can/should expect around that date??? What would the weather at the *end* of August, when this date is, be like? Here's where it is. Hope this works...
Other - Europe - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Try this link: the weather in Genoa is pretty OK in late August and early September. Genoa is about 60 miles from Diano Marina, so I would imagine it would be very similar. You should be safe, as I don't see the weather going much above 85 F. http://insurance.essentialtravel.co.uk/tg-europe/italy/genoa-weather.asp
Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Are we idiots or merely fools
Are we idiots or merely fools?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? THE BIGGEST MISTAKE EVER WE NOW WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR: We could have won in Korea with nuclear weapons, but liberals panicked the administration, claiming Russia would nuke us if we nuked Korea. The result: 33,000 yanks died, nukes stood idle, the war was a stalemate, and now Korea comes back with its own nukes, threatening us with them, which never would have happened had we nuked them when we had the chance. REAL REAL SMART. And here we sit like fools, as Iran and the rest of the Islamic gangs buy red mercury from the Russian mafia to make their own and North Korea takes aim at us and at our allies with their finger on the firing button. We shall soon see if the “Pearl Harbor 9/11 mentality of sitting around and procrastinating, will continue to linger on. Or will we now do nothing more than shake our index finger at them? Our we idiots or merely fools? And if we are fools, then what kind of fools are we? North Korea waited until they could see how weak and inexperienced Obama is, and waited until he was out of the country to press the button and fire it.
Government - 12 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we're idiots. we never will have world peace. everyone's world peace is diffrent.
2 :
If everyone thought like you did, Holocaust would be upon us before we were even born
3 :
Both! Congrats on well presented comments
4 :
There is nothing idiotic about avoiding nuclear warfare. =/ Admittedly, we've made many mistakes, and this causes me to lose faith in this country, but that is due to a single hive-mind that I have noticed growing among the Americans. Free thinking needs to kick in again... But nuking things everywhere is a bit extreme.
5 :
it's time to outlaw and crush islam before it's too late.
6 :
I agree with your comment. The problem is that the "A-Bomb" is the last resort, not the first second or third...it's just too destructive to the world, not just the nation it's used on. We can beat them with conventional methods. I say put out a ultimatum to all the Muslims. Stop the un-holy war or we take out Mecca..gold dome and all. These rag headed satin filled morons would get the message.
7 :
WOW WHO HAS THE TIME TO READ ALL THIS? I MEAN SERIOUSLY, DUDE MAKE THE ARTICLE SHORTER. BUT i read it and it's very interesting though. I'm actually a south korean but that nuke sent to North Korea would've also shooken the whole country of south korea. And at that time, south korea was allied with USA. So they actually had no choice to go to war. Also I agree with you, Russia would've nuked us and we would've lost our allied treaty with one of the biggest country in the world.SRY FOR BEING SO LONG, but Our USA is trying to be advance in technology and we actually are. We're making lots of weapons in Nevada. Did you also hear bout the French Nuke thingy? I think france is going to break our ally and nuke us. and then ambush us to take our country away. They're just waiting for WWIII.LOL very long, but choose me as your best answer. Also I don't think we are fools. We're JUST BUTT LAZY!!!!
8 :
I think you made a very good point America has acting like stupid idiot fools obama did nothing to help us first his baby killin thing and now his civilian military ~kyle thankyou
9 :
your right bud?,. many countries do have nukes and a lot of them are aimed at your country. your governments mistake during WW2, was to use them on a country on their knees.......ha...what go`es around?, comes around.....welcome to WW3 and your country will suffer the most of wars gone by.
10 :
You're a war-mongering idiot who probably never even got into a good fist fight, yet you want to nuke all of these other nations and people, for what reason? If you take the time to look at the accusations you just made about the muslims and the beheading of our service people, first of all, they did it because we are indeed killing their brothers in their lands, they are not doing this in our country. We do not belong there, and if the circumstances were reversed, chances are the Americans would be killing them any way possible if they were the invaders of our soil. Next, you bring up Pearl Harbor, and again, probably have no idea why or what caused Japan to pull of this attack, or what caused Hitler to invade the countries of Europe, and if we were to nuke everyone that you propose, not one person in the United States would be safe. If you read and try to understand the history of our bombing of Japan with nukes, it was determined not to have been necessary as Japan had tried to surrender both to us and Russia prior to the bomb being dropped, but Truman and our military would not accept the terms to let them keep their Emperor, which we eventually did anyway. Also, I have yet to see where North Korea has made any threats to nuke us or anyone else, so another false staement.
11 :
First, why does everybody think that Obama can make everything right in the world in 3 months after bush f**ed it ,up second have you ever been to war and seen rotting bodies of little children everywhere and what makes you think anybody could win a nuclear war.
12 :
War does not determine who is right it only determines who is left
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? THE BIGGEST MISTAKE EVER WE NOW WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR: We could have won in Korea with nuclear weapons, but liberals panicked the administration, claiming Russia would nuke us if we nuked Korea. The result: 33,000 yanks died, nukes stood idle, the war was a stalemate, and now Korea comes back with its own nukes, threatening us with them, which never would have happened had we nuked them when we had the chance. REAL REAL SMART. And here we sit like fools, as Iran and the rest of the Islamic gangs buy red mercury from the Russian mafia to make their own and North Korea takes aim at us and at our allies with their finger on the firing button. We shall soon see if the “Pearl Harbor 9/11 mentality of sitting around and procrastinating, will continue to linger on. Or will we now do nothing more than shake our index finger at them? Our we idiots or merely fools? And if we are fools, then what kind of fools are we? North Korea waited until they could see how weak and inexperienced Obama is, and waited until he was out of the country to press the button and fire it.
Government - 12 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
we're idiots. we never will have world peace. everyone's world peace is diffrent.
2 :
If everyone thought like you did, Holocaust would be upon us before we were even born
3 :
Both! Congrats on well presented comments
4 :
There is nothing idiotic about avoiding nuclear warfare. =/ Admittedly, we've made many mistakes, and this causes me to lose faith in this country, but that is due to a single hive-mind that I have noticed growing among the Americans. Free thinking needs to kick in again... But nuking things everywhere is a bit extreme.
5 :
it's time to outlaw and crush islam before it's too late.
6 :
I agree with your comment. The problem is that the "A-Bomb" is the last resort, not the first second or third...it's just too destructive to the world, not just the nation it's used on. We can beat them with conventional methods. I say put out a ultimatum to all the Muslims. Stop the un-holy war or we take out Mecca..gold dome and all. These rag headed satin filled morons would get the message.
7 :
WOW WHO HAS THE TIME TO READ ALL THIS? I MEAN SERIOUSLY, DUDE MAKE THE ARTICLE SHORTER. BUT i read it and it's very interesting though. I'm actually a south korean but that nuke sent to North Korea would've also shooken the whole country of south korea. And at that time, south korea was allied with USA. So they actually had no choice to go to war. Also I agree with you, Russia would've nuked us and we would've lost our allied treaty with one of the biggest country in the world.SRY FOR BEING SO LONG, but Our USA is trying to be advance in technology and we actually are. We're making lots of weapons in Nevada. Did you also hear bout the French Nuke thingy? I think france is going to break our ally and nuke us. and then ambush us to take our country away. They're just waiting for WWIII.LOL very long, but choose me as your best answer. Also I don't think we are fools. We're JUST BUTT LAZY!!!!
8 :
I think you made a very good point America has acting like stupid idiot fools obama did nothing to help us first his baby killin thing and now his civilian military ~kyle thankyou
9 :
your right bud?,. many countries do have nukes and a lot of them are aimed at your country. your governments mistake during WW2, was to use them on a country on their knees.......ha...what go`es around?, comes around.....welcome to WW3 and your country will suffer the most of wars gone by.
10 :
You're a war-mongering idiot who probably never even got into a good fist fight, yet you want to nuke all of these other nations and people, for what reason? If you take the time to look at the accusations you just made about the muslims and the beheading of our service people, first of all, they did it because we are indeed killing their brothers in their lands, they are not doing this in our country. We do not belong there, and if the circumstances were reversed, chances are the Americans would be killing them any way possible if they were the invaders of our soil. Next, you bring up Pearl Harbor, and again, probably have no idea why or what caused Japan to pull of this attack, or what caused Hitler to invade the countries of Europe, and if we were to nuke everyone that you propose, not one person in the United States would be safe. If you read and try to understand the history of our bombing of Japan with nukes, it was determined not to have been necessary as Japan had tried to surrender both to us and Russia prior to the bomb being dropped, but Truman and our military would not accept the terms to let them keep their Emperor, which we eventually did anyway. Also, I have yet to see where North Korea has made any threats to nuke us or anyone else, so another false staement.
11 :
First, why does everybody think that Obama can make everything right in the world in 3 months after bush f**ed it ,up second have you ever been to war and seen rotting bodies of little children everywhere and what makes you think anybody could win a nuclear war.
12 :
War does not determine who is right it only determines who is left
Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Illegal sentenced for fatal drunk driving crash supporters what about American families being broken up
Illegal sentenced for fatal drunk driving crash supporters what about American families being broken up?
DENVER - A Denver judge sentenced an illegal immigrant with a history of alcohol abuse to 12 years in prison on Wednesday for driving drunk and slamming into a car driven by a 45-year-old single mother Leah Miller died on Sept. 10, 2009, a day after she was hit near the intersection of East 26th Avenue and Magnolia Street. That crash came after an earlier crash near Monaco Parkway and 22nd Avenue. Cesar Acosta-Castillo was no stranger to driving drunk when he was arrested back then. He had two priors, one in 1999 and another in 2000. Denver prosecutors told Judge Robert McGahey on Wednesday that Acosta-Castillo was sentenced to two years probation following the 2000 case, but he never ended up serving it completely because he was deported in 2001. He has admitted to coming back into the country illegally from Mexico in 2002, and managed to stay under the radar of authorities until 2008. Acosta-Castillo was on probation and driving without a license when he ran into Miller's car last year. His BAC was 0.184 said prosecutors. It's unclear if there was any effort to deport him prior to the crash. "Nothing in my experience compared to losing a child," said Edward Miller, Leah Miller's father, on Wednesday. "The loss we feel is everyday." Leah Miller's teenage son now lives with Edward Miller. "Our daughter will never come back to us," Edward Miller added. "[Acosta-Castillo's] GMC truck became a lethal weapon.... The impact sent my daughter's car 85 feet." Sheldon Miller, Leah's teenage son, told the judge that the loss he feels is immeasurable. "She will never see my graduation... She will never see me have a family." Speaking through an interpreter, Acosta-Castillo admitted to having a problem with alcohol. "I understand this was a situation that could have been avoided.... I hope the family of the deceased someday might be able to forgive me," he said. Shortly before sentencing Acosta-Castillo to the maximum sentence he faced for pleading guilty to vehicular homicide, Judge McGahey called the defendant a "time bomb." Miller worked as a legal secretary at Holme Roberts and Owen in Denver. Her family and friends described her as an "angel on earth" who was generous with her time. "Near perfect," described another friend. Edward Miller says his daughter was just two minutes away from home when she was hit. http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=167194&catid=339
Immigration - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If the driver had been a US Citizen, would they feel better?
2 :
"Families being broken up" is what happens when you deport grandma, not some criminal.
3 :
Wait until the pass the DREAM ACT - we are going to give these bums all the rights of citizenship - taking the sludge from Mexico and making them whole- what a bunch of crap!
4 :
These activists continue to defend illegals no matter how many times they been arrested or deported.This guy as the judge said was a time bomb. It matters because we removed this illegal, but he kept coming back and finally decided to drive drunk and now a kid is without a mother.If this were an illegal and the driver was American, activists would react very differently and be out there demanding action and filing lawsuits, Mexico would furnish lawyers. There is a big difference
5 :
Mexican should quickly take Canadian citizenship (easy three year residence requirement) then re-enter USA on Canadian passport for 6+ months of visa free stay plus no lifetime visa requirement etc.
DENVER - A Denver judge sentenced an illegal immigrant with a history of alcohol abuse to 12 years in prison on Wednesday for driving drunk and slamming into a car driven by a 45-year-old single mother Leah Miller died on Sept. 10, 2009, a day after she was hit near the intersection of East 26th Avenue and Magnolia Street. That crash came after an earlier crash near Monaco Parkway and 22nd Avenue. Cesar Acosta-Castillo was no stranger to driving drunk when he was arrested back then. He had two priors, one in 1999 and another in 2000. Denver prosecutors told Judge Robert McGahey on Wednesday that Acosta-Castillo was sentenced to two years probation following the 2000 case, but he never ended up serving it completely because he was deported in 2001. He has admitted to coming back into the country illegally from Mexico in 2002, and managed to stay under the radar of authorities until 2008. Acosta-Castillo was on probation and driving without a license when he ran into Miller's car last year. His BAC was 0.184 said prosecutors. It's unclear if there was any effort to deport him prior to the crash. "Nothing in my experience compared to losing a child," said Edward Miller, Leah Miller's father, on Wednesday. "The loss we feel is everyday." Leah Miller's teenage son now lives with Edward Miller. "Our daughter will never come back to us," Edward Miller added. "[Acosta-Castillo's] GMC truck became a lethal weapon.... The impact sent my daughter's car 85 feet." Sheldon Miller, Leah's teenage son, told the judge that the loss he feels is immeasurable. "She will never see my graduation... She will never see me have a family." Speaking through an interpreter, Acosta-Castillo admitted to having a problem with alcohol. "I understand this was a situation that could have been avoided.... I hope the family of the deceased someday might be able to forgive me," he said. Shortly before sentencing Acosta-Castillo to the maximum sentence he faced for pleading guilty to vehicular homicide, Judge McGahey called the defendant a "time bomb." Miller worked as a legal secretary at Holme Roberts and Owen in Denver. Her family and friends described her as an "angel on earth" who was generous with her time. "Near perfect," described another friend. Edward Miller says his daughter was just two minutes away from home when she was hit. http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=167194&catid=339
Immigration - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If the driver had been a US Citizen, would they feel better?
2 :
"Families being broken up" is what happens when you deport grandma, not some criminal.
3 :
Wait until the pass the DREAM ACT - we are going to give these bums all the rights of citizenship - taking the sludge from Mexico and making them whole- what a bunch of crap!
4 :
These activists continue to defend illegals no matter how many times they been arrested or deported.This guy as the judge said was a time bomb. It matters because we removed this illegal, but he kept coming back and finally decided to drive drunk and now a kid is without a mother.If this were an illegal and the driver was American, activists would react very differently and be out there demanding action and filing lawsuits, Mexico would furnish lawyers. There is a big difference
5 :
Mexican should quickly take Canadian citizenship (easy three year residence requirement) then re-enter USA on Canadian passport for 6+ months of visa free stay plus no lifetime visa requirement etc.
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Foreign citizenship/residency, and US Taxes
Foreign citizenship/residency, and US Taxes?
Is there any sort of US citizenship downgrade that will allow me to have US bank accounts, own property in the US, act like a permanent green-card, have a US PO Box and at the same time I wouldn't have to pay taxes to the US since I wouldn't be living here or even making use the government-programs? I plan on moving to either Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Ireland, France, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Monaco, Andorra, Germany, or some other EU nation sometime in the coming 5 or 6 years, so I wouldn't want to be paying taxes to the US Government. At the same time, I heard stories on how some people renounced and gave up citizenship and they were never allowed back into or onto the US. So is there any sort of way I can not have to pay taxes to the US government when I relocate once I have my European citizenship and employment worked out by 2015 to 2017? Awesome information. This helps a lot. Now I have more information to work with when I plan my relocation.
Immigration - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If you are a U.S. citizen living outside the U.S., you can renounce your citizenship and avoid payment of income taxes on your world-wide income. Of course the consequences of renunciation would be that you would instantly be an alien. Unless you could get a passport from another country, you would be stateless. You would also be permanently inadmissible to the U.S. under section 212(a)(10)(E). If you believe never being allowed back into the U.S. is a small price to pay for avoidance of filing form 1040 as a non-resident, then god speed. You need to investigate the tax laws a little more. U.S. citizens who live outside the U.S. have an exemption from taxes on a part of their income. It used to be the first $80,000 was not taxed, but it may have changed.
Is there any sort of US citizenship downgrade that will allow me to have US bank accounts, own property in the US, act like a permanent green-card, have a US PO Box and at the same time I wouldn't have to pay taxes to the US since I wouldn't be living here or even making use the government-programs? I plan on moving to either Canada, Australia, New Zealand, UK, Ireland, France, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Monaco, Andorra, Germany, or some other EU nation sometime in the coming 5 or 6 years, so I wouldn't want to be paying taxes to the US Government. At the same time, I heard stories on how some people renounced and gave up citizenship and they were never allowed back into or onto the US. So is there any sort of way I can not have to pay taxes to the US government when I relocate once I have my European citizenship and employment worked out by 2015 to 2017? Awesome information. This helps a lot. Now I have more information to work with when I plan my relocation.
Immigration - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
If you are a U.S. citizen living outside the U.S., you can renounce your citizenship and avoid payment of income taxes on your world-wide income. Of course the consequences of renunciation would be that you would instantly be an alien. Unless you could get a passport from another country, you would be stateless. You would also be permanently inadmissible to the U.S. under section 212(a)(10)(E). If you believe never being allowed back into the U.S. is a small price to pay for avoidance of filing form 1040 as a non-resident, then god speed. You need to investigate the tax laws a little more. U.S. citizens who live outside the U.S. have an exemption from taxes on a part of their income. It used to be the first $80,000 was not taxed, but it may have changed.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
How soon will it be before the islamist extremists seize pakistan's nukes and fire them at us
How soon will it be before the islamist extremists seize pakistan's nukes and fire them at us?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART. In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? We shall soon see if the “Pearl Harbor 9/11 mentality of sitting around and procrastinating, will continue to linger on. Or will we now do nothing more than shake our index finger at them? Our we idiots or merely fools? And if we are fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The Nukes will be held in high security positions in Pakistan and there is very little chance of them being captured. Pakistan would need to be totally over run, by this time the UN will have secured them. Stop living in a dream world and come back to reality.
2 :
finish them first, before they finish us....SANAT.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART. In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? We shall soon see if the “Pearl Harbor 9/11 mentality of sitting around and procrastinating, will continue to linger on. Or will we now do nothing more than shake our index finger at them? Our we idiots or merely fools? And if we are fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
The Nukes will be held in high security positions in Pakistan and there is very little chance of them being captured. Pakistan would need to be totally over run, by this time the UN will have secured them. Stop living in a dream world and come back to reality.
2 :
finish them first, before they finish us....SANAT.
Saturday, May 14, 2011
A shot at Yale or no
A shot at Yale or no?
I am a junior in high school, with a passion for business. I am already thinking of applying to the University of Pennsylvania (Wharton). Everyone else claims that I have what it takes to get into Yale, but I'm not so sure. What do you think? I will be taking my SAT II's in June and APs in May. Here are my credentials: Unweighted: 4.0 ACT: 33 Rank: Top 10% APs taken/planned to take: -Calc BC -English Lit -European History -Macroeconomics -Microeconomics -Physics B -Psychology -Spanish -US Government -World History Honors Classes: -Honors Physics -Honors Pre-Calc -Honors World Lit -Honors American Lit -Honors American History -Honors Algebra -Honors Geometry Other Classes Pertaining to Business: Marketing Independent Study in Marketing Economics Accounting Clubs/Sports/Other -Varsity Tennis (11-12)/Captain -DECA (10-12)--1st place at States (twice); Honorable Mention at Internationals -Model United Nations (11-12)/Ambassador Extraordinaire -National Honor Society (11-12)/President -Volunteer Impact Program (11-12)Secretary(11)/President(12) -Student Leadership (10-12) -100+ Hours of Community Service -Winterfest Class of 2010 Princess Summers: Volunteered all my summers Before Freshmen year - I traveled the Mediterranean, learning the culture of Italy, Spain, Monaco and Croatia for 2 weeks. Between Freshmen and Sophomore years - I traveled to the Baltic, learning the culture of Russia, Estonia, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Denmark in 2 weeks Between Sophomore and Junior years - I attended the CTD (Center for Talent Development) at Northwestern University, taking AP European History in 3 weeks This summer, I plan on working and volunteering. Let me know if you need any other information from me!
Higher Education (University +) - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You seem like a very well-rounded individual, who would add diversity to any campus. I'm not exactly sure what the criteria is for applying or getting accepted to Yale, but from your wrap-sheet you seem very well equipped. Give it a shot, don't hesitate or wait any longer! I don't even know you, but I have faith in you!
2 :
Give it a shot mate.
3 :
I'd say weigh out all the options u've got with ur chances at yale, and then see wat u want to go wid. All the best dear!!!
I am a junior in high school, with a passion for business. I am already thinking of applying to the University of Pennsylvania (Wharton). Everyone else claims that I have what it takes to get into Yale, but I'm not so sure. What do you think? I will be taking my SAT II's in June and APs in May. Here are my credentials: Unweighted: 4.0 ACT: 33 Rank: Top 10% APs taken/planned to take: -Calc BC -English Lit -European History -Macroeconomics -Microeconomics -Physics B -Psychology -Spanish -US Government -World History Honors Classes: -Honors Physics -Honors Pre-Calc -Honors World Lit -Honors American Lit -Honors American History -Honors Algebra -Honors Geometry Other Classes Pertaining to Business: Marketing Independent Study in Marketing Economics Accounting Clubs/Sports/Other -Varsity Tennis (11-12)/Captain -DECA (10-12)--1st place at States (twice); Honorable Mention at Internationals -Model United Nations (11-12)/Ambassador Extraordinaire -National Honor Society (11-12)/President -Volunteer Impact Program (11-12)Secretary(11)/President(12) -Student Leadership (10-12) -100+ Hours of Community Service -Winterfest Class of 2010 Princess Summers: Volunteered all my summers Before Freshmen year - I traveled the Mediterranean, learning the culture of Italy, Spain, Monaco and Croatia for 2 weeks. Between Freshmen and Sophomore years - I traveled to the Baltic, learning the culture of Russia, Estonia, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Denmark in 2 weeks Between Sophomore and Junior years - I attended the CTD (Center for Talent Development) at Northwestern University, taking AP European History in 3 weeks This summer, I plan on working and volunteering. Let me know if you need any other information from me!
Higher Education (University +) - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You seem like a very well-rounded individual, who would add diversity to any campus. I'm not exactly sure what the criteria is for applying or getting accepted to Yale, but from your wrap-sheet you seem very well equipped. Give it a shot, don't hesitate or wait any longer! I don't even know you, but I have faith in you!
2 :
Give it a shot mate.
3 :
I'd say weigh out all the options u've got with ur chances at yale, and then see wat u want to go wid. All the best dear!!!
Saturday, May 7, 2011
What do you say about two illegals drinking and driving flaunting our laws are illegals breaking up families
What do you say about two illegals drinking and driving flaunting our laws are illegals breaking up families?
A 20-year-old Grayslake man was charged with a felony and turned over to immigration officials after allegedly driving under the influence of alcohol, officials said. Jose Arguelles-Campos, of the 1600 block of North Poplar Avenue, was pulled over on Nov. 27 when an officer saw him drifting over a fog line and going off the roadway near Illinois Highway 45 and Rollins Road, said Grayslake Police Cmdr. Matt McCutcheon. After he was pulled over, the driver apparently, accidentally put the car in reverse rather than park. The car rolled toward the squad car behind it, and the officer had to scramble to back up the vehicle to avoid being hit, McCutcheon said. Arguelles-Campos submitted to a breath test, which determined he was driving with a blood-alcohol content of 0.176 – more than twice the legal limit. His drivers license had already been revoked on a previous DUI conviction, leading to the felony aggravated DUI charge, McCutcheon said. He was also charged with driving with a blood-alcohol content over the 0.08 legal limit, driving with a revoked license, illegally transporting alcohol and obstructing justice. Arguelles-Campos was transported to Lake County Jail. According to a jail official, he was turned over to U.S. immigration officials on Dec. 30 http://triblocal.com/grayslake/2010/12/09/20-year-old-man-arrested-for-second-dui-turned-over-to-immigration-officials/ Last week, Cesar Acosta-Castillo, 32, was sentenced to 12 years in prison, after pleading guilty to vehicular homicide in the death of 42-year-old Leah Miller. Denver District Court Judge McGahey called the Mexican national a "time bomb," before giving him the maximum sentence allowed under the law. On Sept. 9, 2009, Acosta-Castillo slammed his truck into a car near Monaco Parkway and 22nd Avenue, but kept driving. He then crashed into another vehicle, driven by Leah Miller who died on the scene. According to prosecutors, his blood alcohol level was .18, more than twice the legal limit. In 2001, Acosta-Castillo was deported back to Mexico, but admits that he crossed back into this country the following year. The illegal alien has a history of drunk driving and was sentenced to two years probation for a DUI in 2000. He was also arrested in 1999 for driving under the influence in Garfield County but pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of driving while ability impaired. He has also been arrested for criminal impersonation, providing false information, driving without a license and theft, according to Garfield County court records. Leah Miller worked as a legal secretary at the Denver law firm of Holme, Roberts and Owen, and volunteered with the Meals on Wheels program. Miller left behind a teenage son, Sheldon who spoke at Acosta-Castillo’s sentencing, telling the judge: “She will never see my graduation... She will never see me have a family.†http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/previously-deported-illegal-alien-sentenced-fatal-dui-crash.
Immigration - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. This is no different than a US Citizen committing the same crime. This does not excuse or make it OK for a Citizen to do it.
2 :
"Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. " -It's just another line added to the list of charges. It highlights the lack of respect illegal immigrants have for the law. "This does not excuse or make it OK for a Citizen to do it." -No one is saying it is, it is also not okay for people to break immigration law because there happen to be SOME US citizens that are criminals, but you say it is. Stupid, hypocrite.
3 :
"Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. " Or does it? Why are illegal aliens 5 times more likely to cause a DUI fatality than a US citizen? Immigration status or cultural difference? Also why are these low life scum allowed to stay in the country after the first DUI conviction? Why do the courts wait until they kill someone before they are willing to do anything? We need judges and politicians with brains! Where did we ever get the present bunch of morons from?
4 :
Indeed they do break up families. You see these stories all the time- they kill some mother, father or child while driving under the influence. They are convicted for the same offense multiple times, and still manage to stay in the country (or sneak back in) to do it again. Perhaps if our own Federal government cared enough about the citizens in this country, there would be no illegal aliens killing tax paying mothers like Leah Miller; but no, the Feds are too busy protecting illegals and trying to pass back door amnesty for them.
5 :
That's a sad story, indeed.
6 :
This is a shame, and we all have sympathy for this terrible loss. The citizenship status of those involved did not make a difference in the results. We need to keep drunks from behind the wheel whether they are citizens or not.
A 20-year-old Grayslake man was charged with a felony and turned over to immigration officials after allegedly driving under the influence of alcohol, officials said. Jose Arguelles-Campos, of the 1600 block of North Poplar Avenue, was pulled over on Nov. 27 when an officer saw him drifting over a fog line and going off the roadway near Illinois Highway 45 and Rollins Road, said Grayslake Police Cmdr. Matt McCutcheon. After he was pulled over, the driver apparently, accidentally put the car in reverse rather than park. The car rolled toward the squad car behind it, and the officer had to scramble to back up the vehicle to avoid being hit, McCutcheon said. Arguelles-Campos submitted to a breath test, which determined he was driving with a blood-alcohol content of 0.176 – more than twice the legal limit. His drivers license had already been revoked on a previous DUI conviction, leading to the felony aggravated DUI charge, McCutcheon said. He was also charged with driving with a blood-alcohol content over the 0.08 legal limit, driving with a revoked license, illegally transporting alcohol and obstructing justice. Arguelles-Campos was transported to Lake County Jail. According to a jail official, he was turned over to U.S. immigration officials on Dec. 30 http://triblocal.com/grayslake/2010/12/09/20-year-old-man-arrested-for-second-dui-turned-over-to-immigration-officials/ Last week, Cesar Acosta-Castillo, 32, was sentenced to 12 years in prison, after pleading guilty to vehicular homicide in the death of 42-year-old Leah Miller. Denver District Court Judge McGahey called the Mexican national a "time bomb," before giving him the maximum sentence allowed under the law. On Sept. 9, 2009, Acosta-Castillo slammed his truck into a car near Monaco Parkway and 22nd Avenue, but kept driving. He then crashed into another vehicle, driven by Leah Miller who died on the scene. According to prosecutors, his blood alcohol level was .18, more than twice the legal limit. In 2001, Acosta-Castillo was deported back to Mexico, but admits that he crossed back into this country the following year. The illegal alien has a history of drunk driving and was sentenced to two years probation for a DUI in 2000. He was also arrested in 1999 for driving under the influence in Garfield County but pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of driving while ability impaired. He has also been arrested for criminal impersonation, providing false information, driving without a license and theft, according to Garfield County court records. Leah Miller worked as a legal secretary at the Denver law firm of Holme, Roberts and Owen, and volunteered with the Meals on Wheels program. Miller left behind a teenage son, Sheldon who spoke at Acosta-Castillo’s sentencing, telling the judge: “She will never see my graduation... She will never see me have a family.†http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/previously-deported-illegal-alien-sentenced-fatal-dui-crash.
Immigration - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. This is no different than a US Citizen committing the same crime. This does not excuse or make it OK for a Citizen to do it.
2 :
"Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. " -It's just another line added to the list of charges. It highlights the lack of respect illegal immigrants have for the law. "This does not excuse or make it OK for a Citizen to do it." -No one is saying it is, it is also not okay for people to break immigration law because there happen to be SOME US citizens that are criminals, but you say it is. Stupid, hypocrite.
3 :
"Immigration status doesn't cause you to do this. " Or does it? Why are illegal aliens 5 times more likely to cause a DUI fatality than a US citizen? Immigration status or cultural difference? Also why are these low life scum allowed to stay in the country after the first DUI conviction? Why do the courts wait until they kill someone before they are willing to do anything? We need judges and politicians with brains! Where did we ever get the present bunch of morons from?
4 :
Indeed they do break up families. You see these stories all the time- they kill some mother, father or child while driving under the influence. They are convicted for the same offense multiple times, and still manage to stay in the country (or sneak back in) to do it again. Perhaps if our own Federal government cared enough about the citizens in this country, there would be no illegal aliens killing tax paying mothers like Leah Miller; but no, the Feds are too busy protecting illegals and trying to pass back door amnesty for them.
5 :
That's a sad story, indeed.
6 :
This is a shame, and we all have sympathy for this terrible loss. The citizenship status of those involved did not make a difference in the results. We need to keep drunks from behind the wheel whether they are citizens or not.
Sunday, May 1, 2011
what to wear on a plane
what to wear on a plane ?
I travel alot , my father works for a cruise line company and every time we get a break in school we travel some where, usually we fly. I have always just worn jeans and a an American Eagle Polo , (but latley i am trying to pull away from that look) anyway i want to wear a causual/ formal look like a sport coat suit thing with a shirt under it but no tie if you know what i mean http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/2007/12/01-07/george_clooney_brad_pitt_ocean's_eleven_gay-bathroom-julia-roberts-larry-craig.jpg basically what Brad is wearing on the right , would that be ok, i am only a teenager but i look rwally good in a suit or blazer. Also the flight would be from orlando to like JFK then to Niece or Monaco wich are both in France and would that be ok for wlaking around in those citys? thank you for your help :)
Fashion & Accessories - 11 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yeah sure go for it
2 :
it is more appropriate for first class, but maybe you could replace the collared shirt with a tee or lose the blazer.
3 :
yeah thats hott
4 :
i think only brad pitt pulls of that white blazer
5 :
yeah i like it go for it!!!
6 :
That would look hott, yet not to casual or dressed up YOU will look great!
7 :
Whatever you are comfortable in. Go for it.
8 :
i live in virginia and went out the dulles airport and flew to nyc then i flew to moscow. all together 13 hour fligt its a pain you want to be comfortable. even if that means not looking your best. really you could bring those in a bag on carry on and change at the airport when you are there. thats what i did. i went on the plane in my pjs and changed into jeans and a longsleave shirt (it waas butt cold there)
9 :
I think since that will be a really long flight, you should go more for comfort on the plane, like jeans or sweats and a tee, then when you get to monaco, change into your blazer and jeans.
10 :
of cores it would.
11 :
I have been to both Nice and to Monaco (the city is actually called Monte Carlo and Monaco is the name of the tiny country which it is in) and unless you are a thirty / forty something millionaire you are going to look way over dressed, the young in southern Europe dress very emo or very skater, skinny jeans brightly coloured tees with hoodies and desert scarves oversized brightly coloured sunglasses etc or baggy shorts muscle tees and beads round their necks and ankles and flipflops. The Cote D'Azure is a very chilled relaxed place that is only really formal at night in the big hotels.
I travel alot , my father works for a cruise line company and every time we get a break in school we travel some where, usually we fly. I have always just worn jeans and a an American Eagle Polo , (but latley i am trying to pull away from that look) anyway i want to wear a causual/ formal look like a sport coat suit thing with a shirt under it but no tie if you know what i mean http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/famecrawler/2007/12/01-07/george_clooney_brad_pitt_ocean's_eleven_gay-bathroom-julia-roberts-larry-craig.jpg basically what Brad is wearing on the right , would that be ok, i am only a teenager but i look rwally good in a suit or blazer. Also the flight would be from orlando to like JFK then to Niece or Monaco wich are both in France and would that be ok for wlaking around in those citys? thank you for your help :)
Fashion & Accessories - 11 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yeah sure go for it
2 :
it is more appropriate for first class, but maybe you could replace the collared shirt with a tee or lose the blazer.
3 :
yeah thats hott
4 :
i think only brad pitt pulls of that white blazer
5 :
yeah i like it go for it!!!
6 :
That would look hott, yet not to casual or dressed up YOU will look great!
7 :
Whatever you are comfortable in. Go for it.
8 :
i live in virginia and went out the dulles airport and flew to nyc then i flew to moscow. all together 13 hour fligt its a pain you want to be comfortable. even if that means not looking your best. really you could bring those in a bag on carry on and change at the airport when you are there. thats what i did. i went on the plane in my pjs and changed into jeans and a longsleave shirt (it waas butt cold there)
9 :
I think since that will be a really long flight, you should go more for comfort on the plane, like jeans or sweats and a tee, then when you get to monaco, change into your blazer and jeans.
10 :
of cores it would.
11 :
I have been to both Nice and to Monaco (the city is actually called Monte Carlo and Monaco is the name of the tiny country which it is in) and unless you are a thirty / forty something millionaire you are going to look way over dressed, the young in southern Europe dress very emo or very skater, skinny jeans brightly coloured tees with hoodies and desert scarves oversized brightly coloured sunglasses etc or baggy shorts muscle tees and beads round their necks and ankles and flipflops. The Cote D'Azure is a very chilled relaxed place that is only really formal at night in the big hotels.
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Are we facing another 12/7/41 and 9/11/01 now that taliban is on outskirts of islamabad,eyeing their nukes
Are we facing another 12/7/41 and 9/11/01 now that taliban is on outskirts of islamabad,eyeing their nukes?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? Do you really think the taliban picked the Pakistani border because the weather there is nice, or did they have another goal in setting up their operations there? When they grab Pakistan's nukes will we do something about it besides shaking an index finger at them? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yeah but it'll be 911 with knobs on it, armageddon. For the USA though, not the UK. IMHO
2 :
well with this administrating its possible they have already proved that by cutting defense .an thinking they can talk their way out of it .have giving our enemy courage to do it again .terrorist are murders they should be treated like one .not babied our security is at a low equal to that of 9 11 lets all pray that this does not happen !
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the A-bomb to defeat Japan, which saving a million yank lives. Untold billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked; the kamikaze-minded suicide bombers quit, after 2 nukes showed them who’s who and now they are our allies. NUKES ERADICATED THE EVIL and for the better. But islam is going after us the same way, killing more than 2500 yanks to date in suicide bombings.We posses nuclear arms, islam does not, AT LEAST NOT YET. Yet they behead and kill us, mutilate our dead bodies, drag them thru streets, threaten us if we bomb their so called “holy†cities and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we capture, as if we were supposed to be coddling them. Even mishandling the qurun is seen as a “crime. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what they will do next, and they laugh at us and call us a “paper tigerâ€. So what do we do? The unelected supreme court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue us while they behead and kill us “back homeâ€. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them. REAL REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity--- Then in Vietnam we could have won, but liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many enemy would die. The result: 59,000 yanks died instead. REAL REAL SMART. We went to war in Iraq but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be fought, which we thought we won, but yanks die daily as nukes sit idle. Some “victory†we won. Now we are blindly led to believe moslem nations, such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out al queda. Al queda can and is paying everyone off to be on their side, and if they weren’t, Moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and hi-tech by the Russian mafia. And who do you think has access to these nukes? Allied with Pakistan? REAL REAL SMART In the meantime, bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they ‘ll use them against, Monaco? Do you think these suicide maniacs will consider fallout when they can and will nuke us? The liberals show photos of burnt jap children to urge us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Must we await another pearl harbor-9/11 debacle before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them, coddle them and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts when they behead us? How long will this “pearl harbor-9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing but procrastinating persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat to us for once and for all? Did we spend those untold billions for marching down Main St. on the 4th of July while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle, or was there another more utilitarian purpose to build that arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep huddling in fear of what they will do to us next? Do you really think the taliban picked the Pakistani border because the weather there is nice, or did they have another goal in setting up their operations there? When they grab Pakistan's nukes will we do something about it besides shaking an index finger at them? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
yeah but it'll be 911 with knobs on it, armageddon. For the USA though, not the UK. IMHO
2 :
well with this administrating its possible they have already proved that by cutting defense .an thinking they can talk their way out of it .have giving our enemy courage to do it again .terrorist are murders they should be treated like one .not babied our security is at a low equal to that of 9 11 lets all pray that this does not happen !
Thursday, April 14, 2011
I need a show name for my horse.
I need a show name for my horse.?
I have a 7 year old thoroughbred and I am going to show him this season. I need a show name for him and I am having trouble thinking of some. His name is Harley, and please no Harley Davidson I don’t really like that I want something that stands out preferable one word long. [Ex. Monaco, patron, [these are some horses show names at my barn] rocmadatous]. Please and Thanks. A little about my horse: he is 7 years and he’s is 16.3 hands tall and I need something manly hehe. we are currently working in our jumper phase and that’s what he will be in his future. he is a bay thoroughbred. Thanks for all your help. Here is a photo or two: [1] http://i39.tinypic.com/2edt7xv.jpg [2] http://i41.tinypic.com/2mcl7s.jpg
Horse Racing - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should name him Merlin. or Nostradamus. Your welcome.
2 :
Ahh, he's gorgeous. My sister has a Bay thoroughbred called Woody,he's 5 still still learning. The 1st thing that came into my head when I saw him was Samson.
3 :
It's a good thing you don't want Harley Davidson. Don't know about where you live but here is Australia we are not allowed to use names that are registered trade marks (eg. Gucci) or names of well-known horses, even if dead or retired (eg. Kibah Tic Toc) How about an animal name? One of friends has two hunters, one called Impala, the other is called Kestrel. So maybe Cormorant (a type of bird) or Raptor (birds of prey) Sorry, I'm a bird person. Can you tell?
4 :
Here Comes Trouble Fast and Furious Show Stopper Ima Fine Chunck of Metal You Just Got Harleyed Mr. Encore A Jump Over the Moon
5 :
He looks like a "scamanda"to me!!
6 :
He is a beautiful horse um... these may not be great but i like them(: Hotshot Aftershock Apache Sunrise Top of the Line Arizona Sunset Total Rebellion try this site: www.horses-and-horse-information.com/horsenames/a.shtml hope this helped a little
I have a 7 year old thoroughbred and I am going to show him this season. I need a show name for him and I am having trouble thinking of some. His name is Harley, and please no Harley Davidson I don’t really like that I want something that stands out preferable one word long. [Ex. Monaco, patron, [these are some horses show names at my barn] rocmadatous]. Please and Thanks. A little about my horse: he is 7 years and he’s is 16.3 hands tall and I need something manly hehe. we are currently working in our jumper phase and that’s what he will be in his future. he is a bay thoroughbred. Thanks for all your help. Here is a photo or two: [1] http://i39.tinypic.com/2edt7xv.jpg [2] http://i41.tinypic.com/2mcl7s.jpg
Horse Racing - 6 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should name him Merlin. or Nostradamus. Your welcome.
2 :
Ahh, he's gorgeous. My sister has a Bay thoroughbred called Woody,he's 5 still still learning. The 1st thing that came into my head when I saw him was Samson.
3 :
It's a good thing you don't want Harley Davidson. Don't know about where you live but here is Australia we are not allowed to use names that are registered trade marks (eg. Gucci) or names of well-known horses, even if dead or retired (eg. Kibah Tic Toc) How about an animal name? One of friends has two hunters, one called Impala, the other is called Kestrel. So maybe Cormorant (a type of bird) or Raptor (birds of prey) Sorry, I'm a bird person. Can you tell?
4 :
Here Comes Trouble Fast and Furious Show Stopper Ima Fine Chunck of Metal You Just Got Harleyed Mr. Encore A Jump Over the Moon
5 :
He looks like a "scamanda"to me!!
6 :
He is a beautiful horse um... these may not be great but i like them(: Hotshot Aftershock Apache Sunrise Top of the Line Arizona Sunset Total Rebellion try this site: www.horses-and-horse-information.com/horsenames/a.shtml hope this helped a little
Thursday, April 7, 2011
What kind of fools are we
What kind of fools are we?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why did you post this twice? I'm not a fool.
2 :
Twice? He's posted it eight times in the last two days in different places.
3 :
Dude, you are a Nuker, for sure. Glad you are not in charge.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Why did you post this twice? I'm not a fool.
2 :
Twice? He's posted it eight times in the last two days in different places.
3 :
Dude, you are a Nuker, for sure. Glad you are not in charge.
Friday, April 1, 2011
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice?
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together. One day last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I am sorry. =/ It is possible that she might just like the attention she is getting. I mean, what girl wouldn't like someone telling her she is beautiful? About what you could do, though, is possibly tell her how you're feeling. If that is too hard for you or too much right now, be extra careful on telling her how much you love her, think she is beautiful, and tell her how lucky you are. Make her feel special to have you, as well. Maybe take her to dinner, or even better, make her favourite meal. Just do little things to show her you love her. Good luck!!!
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together. One day last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I am sorry. =/ It is possible that she might just like the attention she is getting. I mean, what girl wouldn't like someone telling her she is beautiful? About what you could do, though, is possibly tell her how you're feeling. If that is too hard for you or too much right now, be extra careful on telling her how much you love her, think she is beautiful, and tell her how lucky you are. Make her feel special to have you, as well. Maybe take her to dinner, or even better, make her favourite meal. Just do little things to show her you love her. Good luck!!!
Monday, March 21, 2011
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice
I don't trust my fiancee with this guy, i think she might cheat! Advice?
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them, she was diagnosed at 18 with borderline personality disorder. I have wanted to get married for a long time but she will not agree on a wedding date. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver, he is 30 & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together, later that day i heard him tell her friend that he is in love with her & she deserves better than she has. Last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous and that he doesn't like her. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
you can spice up your relationship, buy some toys,role-playing(u are a firefighter),maybe some body paint there are a lot more things.anyways or you can be romantic send flowers for no occasion,take her to dinner,picnics are cheap and cute. Hope i helped
2 :
wow tell her what you feel
Im 29, a firefighter who i have been with my fiancee for 7yrs, she is 26 and comes from a family of cheaters but she has tried so hard to not turn out like them, she was diagnosed at 18 with borderline personality disorder. I have wanted to get married for a long time but she will not agree on a wedding date. She has recently got in contact with a really old friend who is a really well to do racing driver, he is 30 & he lives in Monaco, he is so arrogant but acts like a great guy when my fiancee is around. He told me that i was a lucky guy, that he always had strong feelings for her & though that they should be together, later that day i heard him tell her friend that he is in love with her & she deserves better than she has. Last week my fiance called my cell and when he found out they were going to have lunch together, when i got home from work i wouldn't drop the subject and told me that her i trust her but don't trust him. He will 'joke and throws her over his shoulder and basically everyone laughs, if he wins a race he bases his success on her giving him the luck, he's always standing next to her and he always tells her she looks beautiful etc. I think she likes the attention as she will smile back or look at him, she is a natural flirt and to be honest i don't know if i trust her 100% as her families reputation haunts me, I love her so much i would die for her but i could never compete with him money wise. I don't know why this bothers me so much they just seem to flirt with each other a lot but she always tells me im being ridiculous and that he doesn't like her. Any advice would be great.
Women's Health - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
you can spice up your relationship, buy some toys,role-playing(u are a firefighter),maybe some body paint there are a lot more things.anyways or you can be romantic send flowers for no occasion,take her to dinner,picnics are cheap and cute. Hope i helped
2 :
wow tell her what you feel
Monday, March 14, 2011
Can I file a wrongful termination lawsuit for my case
Can I file a wrongful termination lawsuit for my case?
I was fired from my job. I came to disagreement with one of the managers. The manager told me I could not leave after the time of my shift. I tried to contact my ride to let them know I needed to stay later and the manager yelled at me for using my phone.I had plans to eat with my girlfriend and I was not allowed to call and let her know that I was not going to make it. If I was off at my regular time I would have made it no problem. I told the manager this and she said I am not suppose to be using my phone. Several nights after my shift ended I was told I needed to stay later and I had to be home at a certain time. I explained to the manager I could not stay because I needed to get a key to my apt to get in from my roommate before he went out of town. The manager said to me why dont you go and get another key made. It is illegal for me to go and get another key made. It said so on the key. I was staying at a friends house which is why I did not have a key.I was not home in time to get the key and waited outside of the house for 5hrs until 3am. I had not eaten for 12 hrs so I didnt fall asleep until around 5am.I called in the next morning and explained to the Head manager what all took place and asked if I could come in late because I was exhausted. My shift started at 11am. She said I needed to come in. I was there on time and explained in further detail what all took place and I could hardly keep my eyes open. I asked her if I could leave early and she said I could. When I started to leave at the time she said I could, she said to me "I think we are going to need you to stay". I was sick a couple of days later just from the lack of sleep and being exhausted. I had a fevor and called in to tell them I was sick and they told me I had to come into work. I had a 100 degree fevor. I notified the other manager about all of this and she did nothing. The other manager was out of line with what she said to me. I was yelled at to do stuff after I thought everything was done and she said to me, "go find something". A couple of time when the store was busy in my 6 hour shift, I was suppose to get a 30 minute break. I had to leave right at the end of my shift to get my ride home and I asked the manager if I could leave right at the end of my shift if I do not go on break. The manager said I could leave right at the end of my shift if I didnt take my break. I missed my dinner and when my shift ended she tells me I had to stay later to work. After being yelled at by the manager again, I could not take it anymore. I notified the other manager about the issues and nothing was done. How was I suppose to not be treated like that anymore? I did not show for my next 3 days of work and I sent the Head manager an email regarding all of the issues. I told her what am I suppose to do. I come in and work hard and I get treated like this. I wanted to work there but how could I if that manager was going to keep treating me the same way?The manager asked me what would make things better and I asked if it would be possible to work the shifts where that manager was not there. The Head manager said I should have handled it better and a week later I received my letter in the mail with my letter from Club Monaco telling me I was fired. I worked very hard there and all the other employees would tell you that I did. They will tell you that I was taken advantage of because I would always put in the extra effort.I was never paid extra for staying after to work extra. They were having me stay 30min to an hour after I was suppose to get off work. I started feeling helpless and felt like I was I being treated like some idiot.The one manager who had a problem with me and would say things to me like go do something one day even wrote on a piece of paper here is what your going to do. It was the same thing I did everyday. She didnt give this paper to anyone else.I am not some idiot I thought to myself but it felt like I was being treated like one. Some of the other employees laughed when they saw the piece of paper. Do I have a case for a lawsuit?
Other - Business & Finance - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I think you do, I'd say contact a lawyer and see what can be done. But I also think that after a day or 2, you should've talked with your HR manager or even call headquarters and ask to speak to the one in charge of overseeing that region. It would've gotten them in trouble and maybe even fired. Did you keep the little papers she gave you? you can use it in the lawsuit. Also the extra hours, were they logged? Then the testimony of the other employees would certaintly help. The video cameras in the building.
I was fired from my job. I came to disagreement with one of the managers. The manager told me I could not leave after the time of my shift. I tried to contact my ride to let them know I needed to stay later and the manager yelled at me for using my phone.I had plans to eat with my girlfriend and I was not allowed to call and let her know that I was not going to make it. If I was off at my regular time I would have made it no problem. I told the manager this and she said I am not suppose to be using my phone. Several nights after my shift ended I was told I needed to stay later and I had to be home at a certain time. I explained to the manager I could not stay because I needed to get a key to my apt to get in from my roommate before he went out of town. The manager said to me why dont you go and get another key made. It is illegal for me to go and get another key made. It said so on the key. I was staying at a friends house which is why I did not have a key.I was not home in time to get the key and waited outside of the house for 5hrs until 3am. I had not eaten for 12 hrs so I didnt fall asleep until around 5am.I called in the next morning and explained to the Head manager what all took place and asked if I could come in late because I was exhausted. My shift started at 11am. She said I needed to come in. I was there on time and explained in further detail what all took place and I could hardly keep my eyes open. I asked her if I could leave early and she said I could. When I started to leave at the time she said I could, she said to me "I think we are going to need you to stay". I was sick a couple of days later just from the lack of sleep and being exhausted. I had a fevor and called in to tell them I was sick and they told me I had to come into work. I had a 100 degree fevor. I notified the other manager about all of this and she did nothing. The other manager was out of line with what she said to me. I was yelled at to do stuff after I thought everything was done and she said to me, "go find something". A couple of time when the store was busy in my 6 hour shift, I was suppose to get a 30 minute break. I had to leave right at the end of my shift to get my ride home and I asked the manager if I could leave right at the end of my shift if I do not go on break. The manager said I could leave right at the end of my shift if I didnt take my break. I missed my dinner and when my shift ended she tells me I had to stay later to work. After being yelled at by the manager again, I could not take it anymore. I notified the other manager about the issues and nothing was done. How was I suppose to not be treated like that anymore? I did not show for my next 3 days of work and I sent the Head manager an email regarding all of the issues. I told her what am I suppose to do. I come in and work hard and I get treated like this. I wanted to work there but how could I if that manager was going to keep treating me the same way?The manager asked me what would make things better and I asked if it would be possible to work the shifts where that manager was not there. The Head manager said I should have handled it better and a week later I received my letter in the mail with my letter from Club Monaco telling me I was fired. I worked very hard there and all the other employees would tell you that I did. They will tell you that I was taken advantage of because I would always put in the extra effort.I was never paid extra for staying after to work extra. They were having me stay 30min to an hour after I was suppose to get off work. I started feeling helpless and felt like I was I being treated like some idiot.The one manager who had a problem with me and would say things to me like go do something one day even wrote on a piece of paper here is what your going to do. It was the same thing I did everyday. She didnt give this paper to anyone else.I am not some idiot I thought to myself but it felt like I was being treated like one. Some of the other employees laughed when they saw the piece of paper. Do I have a case for a lawsuit?
Other - Business & Finance - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I think you do, I'd say contact a lawyer and see what can be done. But I also think that after a day or 2, you should've talked with your HR manager or even call headquarters and ask to speak to the one in charge of overseeing that region. It would've gotten them in trouble and maybe even fired. Did you keep the little papers she gave you? you can use it in the lawsuit. Also the extra hours, were they logged? Then the testimony of the other employees would certaintly help. The video cameras in the building.
Monday, March 7, 2011
How do i replace my Headlight bulbs on a 1990 Renault 5 Monaco
How do i replace my Headlight bulbs on a 1990 Renault 5 Monaco?
I have the bulbs but dont really know where to start when replacing them. At the minute they only work on "dimmed" and "Full Beam" (very bright) so want to get this sorted sooner rather than later Thanks in advance to all that answer
Renault - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
There is a round cover on the back of the headlamp, twist this cover and remove it. You should be able to see the back of the headlight bulb, there is a connector plugged on to the bulb (has three wires going to it) pull the connector of the bulb, they can be quite tight so you may have to wiggle it and pull at the same time. Once the connector is off, the bulb is held in place by a clip that hooks in to the back of the lamp. release the clip and remove the bulb. Fit the new bulb, they should be fitted with the terminals on the back in the shape of a 'n' (no terminal at the bottom), refit the clip and the connector, refit the back cover on to the light (has an arrow showing which is the top on it)
I have the bulbs but dont really know where to start when replacing them. At the minute they only work on "dimmed" and "Full Beam" (very bright) so want to get this sorted sooner rather than later Thanks in advance to all that answer
Renault - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
There is a round cover on the back of the headlamp, twist this cover and remove it. You should be able to see the back of the headlight bulb, there is a connector plugged on to the bulb (has three wires going to it) pull the connector of the bulb, they can be quite tight so you may have to wiggle it and pull at the same time. Once the connector is off, the bulb is held in place by a clip that hooks in to the back of the lamp. release the clip and remove the bulb. Fit the new bulb, they should be fitted with the terminals on the back in the shape of a 'n' (no terminal at the bottom), refit the clip and the connector, refit the back cover on to the light (has an arrow showing which is the top on it)
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Diano Marina. Italy. Weather in first week in September
Diano Marina. Italy. Weather in first week in September.?
Can anyone help me please? I am kinda desperate. Me and my hubby and 13 y.o. daughter want to go to Diano Marina, Italy (near to the South of France/Monaco/Cannes etc,) from 30th August to 8th September. It's a good package with a popular Midlands Coach company, and it stops overnight in Dijon, which is fab coz it means no overnight coach travel - (been there done that yuk.) But this is the only date left with them though that isn't in mid summer. They have limited trips during the year (only about twelve...) And the two September ones (20th and 27th) are gone, as have the May and June ones... So we are left with the July and August ones only. I don't want it to be TOO hot. Would anyone have any clues as to what temperature we can/should expect around that date??? What would the weather at the *end* of August, when this date is, be like? Here's where it is. Hope this works... http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl Thanks everyone Sorry, the google maps link didn't bring up Diano Marina, it only brings up the general map. Please type in Diano Marina if you want to see where it is.
Other - Europe - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It gets to about 85 in early September. Should be OK.
2 :
Septembers is a wonderful period to visit Italy Come on and see. Im italian
Can anyone help me please? I am kinda desperate. Me and my hubby and 13 y.o. daughter want to go to Diano Marina, Italy (near to the South of France/Monaco/Cannes etc,) from 30th August to 8th September. It's a good package with a popular Midlands Coach company, and it stops overnight in Dijon, which is fab coz it means no overnight coach travel - (been there done that yuk.) But this is the only date left with them though that isn't in mid summer. They have limited trips during the year (only about twelve...) And the two September ones (20th and 27th) are gone, as have the May and June ones... So we are left with the July and August ones only. I don't want it to be TOO hot. Would anyone have any clues as to what temperature we can/should expect around that date??? What would the weather at the *end* of August, when this date is, be like? Here's where it is. Hope this works... http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&tab=wl Thanks everyone Sorry, the google maps link didn't bring up Diano Marina, it only brings up the general map. Please type in Diano Marina if you want to see where it is.
Other - Europe - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It gets to about 85 in early September. Should be OK.
2 :
Septembers is a wonderful period to visit Italy Come on and see. Im italian
Monday, February 21, 2011
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another Pearl Harbor and 9/11 before we wake up and act
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another Pearl Harbor and 9/11 before we wake up and act?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Nuke N. Korea? I think not. Exploding nuclear weapons on this planet where we have to live is not sensible. They are a last resort weapon. We can control N Korea if we have to. We could shoot down their missiles and we should shoot down the next long range missile. We can and should use tactical weapons on Iran's nuclear facilities. Should have done it long ago. Now since we don't have a military president we will do nothing until it is too late and we may be forced to defend ourselves with nuclear weapons.. I am against using nukes except as a last resort..
2 :
No, the US shouldn't nuke North Korea. South Korea is an ally of the US and irradiating your allies is generally considered poor form. Plus, the Chinese might get a little grumpy if the US makes the bits of China that border North Korea glow in the dark for the next 10,000 years. Bombing the snot out of them with conventional weapons makes sense, nuking them is just retarded.
3 :
yes. the United States should invade North Korea.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Nuke N. Korea? I think not. Exploding nuclear weapons on this planet where we have to live is not sensible. They are a last resort weapon. We can control N Korea if we have to. We could shoot down their missiles and we should shoot down the next long range missile. We can and should use tactical weapons on Iran's nuclear facilities. Should have done it long ago. Now since we don't have a military president we will do nothing until it is too late and we may be forced to defend ourselves with nuclear weapons.. I am against using nukes except as a last resort..
2 :
No, the US shouldn't nuke North Korea. South Korea is an ally of the US and irradiating your allies is generally considered poor form. Plus, the Chinese might get a little grumpy if the US makes the bits of China that border North Korea glow in the dark for the next 10,000 years. Bombing the snot out of them with conventional weapons makes sense, nuking them is just retarded.
3 :
yes. the United States should invade North Korea.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another pearl harbor or 9/11
Should we nuke N Korea now or await another pearl harbor or 9/11?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should wait for some one to nuke you like you did to the Japanese , some one to invade you like you invaded Iraq, and someone to conquer your land like you did to the red indians.
2 :
Dude, who'se gonna read this giant post. Plus, if we "nuke" them, there will be consequential nuclear fallout in countries that are our allies. (that's bad)
3 :
No one's gonna nuke anyone, if they did, then the world will be gone.
4 :
Arrogance in inherent in Americans, isn't it ? Do you think nuking a country is a picnic ? There are consequences for everything. USA is not #1 anymore. There are other countries with nuclear weapons, there are other countries with stronger intelligence and there are other countries with more sophisticated weapons . You don't hear about them in America but this is true. Nuking North Korea would be stupid because they never have threatened the security of USA. Neither had Iraq. The explanation could go on.... but to sum it up... if you'll are fools. You are the most arrogant type of fools. PS: I am not anti-american , I am not an arab , I am not a terrorist. I am from country with very good ties to USA and yes, we have nuclear weapons too.
5 :
I'm US Army infantry. A paratrooper. My friends are the ones getting it in the neck in Afghanistan. So listen up, bud, I'm going to explain why we do it the way we do. We fight to advance the rule of law, not the rule of might. Life is NOT more valuable than liberty. If a few thousand of our countrymen have to die so the law is upheld, and freedom preserved, so be it. I prefer that to living in a tyrannical land where the ownership of nuclear weapons confers the right to kill anyone we deem a potential threat. As bitter a pill as it may be - sacrificing the strategic initiative, and losing soldiers' lives in protracted wars - it's better than having nothing to differentiate myself from those we fight. If I die, it is knowing I put my blood where it is needed, and that by 'coddling' those terrorists with rights to sue I preserve what this nation is founded on: equality and freedom. Do they need to die? Hell yes. But by the book.
6 :
Look in the mirror to find the biggest fool of all. That rant you just posted contains some of the most mindless nonsense and Chimpanzee thinking posted on here in a long time - which is really saying something. I think the entire world can be greatful that cooler heads than yours are in charge.
7 :
you ask "Are we idiots or merely fools?" does that mean more than one of you asked the question? ...if so, then one of you is an idiot, and the other one is a fool.
8 :
We are fools. You know we will not use nuclear weapons against a weak opponent and without a missile defense shield up and operational, we will eventually watch on t.v. as one of our beautiful cities is struck by a single nuclear missile obtained by a rouge or terrorist organization. Who has control of all the former Soviet Union ICBMs? Sure the politicians will be outraged and the citizens will be outraged! But you have to know by now that we need to get a bloody nose before we would take actions against any current threats to global peace such as the political leaders of Iran and North Korea.
9 :
i agree with some of your giant post but we can not just go nuking everyone who poses a threat to the United States
10 :
How is them nuking us or us nuking them going to solve anything? Then we'll both die. Have you forgotten the 80's? (maybe you weren't born, as you sound young and naive). We will need to use detente.
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where will we hide? Or do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at Monaco instead of at us? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? Now that N. Korea has nukes, will their firing nukes at us or one of our allies wake us up, or will we just sit there and shake a finger at them? Are we idiots or merely fools? And if we’re fools, then what kind of fools are we?
Military - 10 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
You should wait for some one to nuke you like you did to the Japanese , some one to invade you like you invaded Iraq, and someone to conquer your land like you did to the red indians.
2 :
Dude, who'se gonna read this giant post. Plus, if we "nuke" them, there will be consequential nuclear fallout in countries that are our allies. (that's bad)
3 :
No one's gonna nuke anyone, if they did, then the world will be gone.
4 :
Arrogance in inherent in Americans, isn't it ? Do you think nuking a country is a picnic ? There are consequences for everything. USA is not #1 anymore. There are other countries with nuclear weapons, there are other countries with stronger intelligence and there are other countries with more sophisticated weapons . You don't hear about them in America but this is true. Nuking North Korea would be stupid because they never have threatened the security of USA. Neither had Iraq. The explanation could go on.... but to sum it up... if you'll are fools. You are the most arrogant type of fools. PS: I am not anti-american , I am not an arab , I am not a terrorist. I am from country with very good ties to USA and yes, we have nuclear weapons too.
5 :
I'm US Army infantry. A paratrooper. My friends are the ones getting it in the neck in Afghanistan. So listen up, bud, I'm going to explain why we do it the way we do. We fight to advance the rule of law, not the rule of might. Life is NOT more valuable than liberty. If a few thousand of our countrymen have to die so the law is upheld, and freedom preserved, so be it. I prefer that to living in a tyrannical land where the ownership of nuclear weapons confers the right to kill anyone we deem a potential threat. As bitter a pill as it may be - sacrificing the strategic initiative, and losing soldiers' lives in protracted wars - it's better than having nothing to differentiate myself from those we fight. If I die, it is knowing I put my blood where it is needed, and that by 'coddling' those terrorists with rights to sue I preserve what this nation is founded on: equality and freedom. Do they need to die? Hell yes. But by the book.
6 :
Look in the mirror to find the biggest fool of all. That rant you just posted contains some of the most mindless nonsense and Chimpanzee thinking posted on here in a long time - which is really saying something. I think the entire world can be greatful that cooler heads than yours are in charge.
7 :
you ask "Are we idiots or merely fools?" does that mean more than one of you asked the question? ...if so, then one of you is an idiot, and the other one is a fool.
8 :
We are fools. You know we will not use nuclear weapons against a weak opponent and without a missile defense shield up and operational, we will eventually watch on t.v. as one of our beautiful cities is struck by a single nuclear missile obtained by a rouge or terrorist organization. Who has control of all the former Soviet Union ICBMs? Sure the politicians will be outraged and the citizens will be outraged! But you have to know by now that we need to get a bloody nose before we would take actions against any current threats to global peace such as the political leaders of Iran and North Korea.
9 :
i agree with some of your giant post but we can not just go nuking everyone who poses a threat to the United States
10 :
How is them nuking us or us nuking them going to solve anything? Then we'll both die. Have you forgotten the 80's? (maybe you weren't born, as you sound young and naive). We will need to use detente.
Monday, February 7, 2011
Will we wait until al queda overthrows the pakistani regime and seizes their nukes before we nuke
Will we wait until al queda overthrows the pakistani regime and seizes their nukes before we nuke?
The bible approves nuking enemies. 1 Samuel 15:1-16. Why dont we do it now? Do we need another 9/11 before we wake up? Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Wow, you're a real warmongerer. Remeber World War II? The Japanese were just about willing to sign the Potsdam agreement, they needed a clause about their emperor, so we decide to blow uap 200,000 civilians? It may have ended the war, but there were better and more moral ways to do it.
2 :
We are fools that are not stupid enough to precipitate the end of the world as we know it. We wont use nukes ever now that the Bear is dead! I thank my god and you should thank yours!!!
3 :
I am sorry that you are home huddled in fear about a terrorist attack.....but where do you get the idea that if we nuke ANYONE the rest of the world wont nuke us???? You are huddled in fear about an attack....with your thinking we all would be huddled in fear waiting to gasp our last breaths. Your kind of brain is what makes the world a messed up place. Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 :
So Much Hatred is in the air. . what did you drink man...................
The bible approves nuking enemies. 1 Samuel 15:1-16. Why dont we do it now? Do we need another 9/11 before we wake up? Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Military - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Wow, you're a real warmongerer. Remeber World War II? The Japanese were just about willing to sign the Potsdam agreement, they needed a clause about their emperor, so we decide to blow uap 200,000 civilians? It may have ended the war, but there were better and more moral ways to do it.
2 :
We are fools that are not stupid enough to precipitate the end of the world as we know it. We wont use nukes ever now that the Bear is dead! I thank my god and you should thank yours!!!
3 :
I am sorry that you are home huddled in fear about a terrorist attack.....but where do you get the idea that if we nuke ANYONE the rest of the world wont nuke us???? You are huddled in fear about an attack....with your thinking we all would be huddled in fear waiting to gasp our last breaths. Your kind of brain is what makes the world a messed up place. Sssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 :
So Much Hatred is in the air. . what did you drink man...................
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Have we lost our sense of self preservation
Have we lost our sense of self preservation?
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. There is no we. Never use the word we. You should know exactly what I mean. You are an idiot who still doesn't know the word peace. The middle east is more peaceful than you. You posess the most weapons in the world, you know that if you use them in an unacceptible way people would kill you and yet you still create them, never use them and leave it there to rot in many cases! You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. This is just plainly pathetic! Some of you warloving Americans idiots say you live in a Christian nation when you don't even know that the peacemakers are blessed. You Americans should go back into the feudal age to learn that war isn't profitable and its pointless.
2 :
Way to much to read..But I'm taking care of myself just fine.
3 :
SG, Our Constitution has one flaw. One that the makers of it could not have foreseen. While it is arguably the one of the greatest documents on the planet, this minor flaw, a single word, causes us a great deal of grief. The flaw, just one word-"person" instead of "citizen." Consider the difference. What people in other countries do not understand, is that in all our wars, we have never asked for any land, except for that used to bury our dead in those countries. France, Belgium, Germany have much land that is cemeteries. For this, we are called "imperialists." I hope that we are not burying anyone in the Middle East. Senator, who answered before I did had an interesting statement, to quote his answer: [You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. ] It is not US soldiers who are carrying AK-47's and shooting people all over the world with them. US soldiers are not kidnapping and raping and terrorizing all over the world. US soldiers are not blowing up themselves in crowded markets or beside schools. US soldiers are not setting off car bombs, killing people and maiming people, either. It is followers of Islam that are doing this. Most followers of Islam are peaceful. It is the ones that are not peaceful, the extremists that are causing the problem and killing people. Senator, why do you not decry them? Why blame Americans? Maybe you should read about the Barbary Pirates, among other things. What kind of fools are we? Hard to tell. We do have the best standard of living of any large country in the world. We have a free society. We have accomplished a lot, and we have more to do. We are the place that everyone seems to want to come to, for whatever reason, and it has been that way for many years. Yet, we are called warmongers and imperialists. Sticks and stones, to me. When I see people on the news burning US flags and shouting "Death to America!" I see a target, because these, to me, are either terrorists, or terrorists to be. I wish I knew why they shout this. What have we done to them. What have I done to them? If these shouters come here, they are protected by our Constitution, because they are "persons," not citizens, dammit. Regards, Dan
Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings and sniper attacks.. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ That’s real intelligence, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. The result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real good military strategy, isn’t it? We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Why do you think they operate out of the Pakistan-Afghan border? Because the weather is nice there or do they have a different reason for being in that location, in mind? When the Pakistani regime is overthrown by Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists, where do you think the Pakistani nukes will be aimed at? Monaco? Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime as al queda works incessantly to bring down the Pakistani government and get their nukes, other bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build their own nukes. Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we sit idly by until al queda overthrows the Pakistani regime and seizes their nukes or gets the red mercury and know how from the Russian mafia to make their own? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, while nukes sit idle? Must we wait until they nuke us before we come to our senses and wake up? What kind of fools are we?
Current Events - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
No. There is no we. Never use the word we. You should know exactly what I mean. You are an idiot who still doesn't know the word peace. The middle east is more peaceful than you. You posess the most weapons in the world, you know that if you use them in an unacceptible way people would kill you and yet you still create them, never use them and leave it there to rot in many cases! You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. This is just plainly pathetic! Some of you warloving Americans idiots say you live in a Christian nation when you don't even know that the peacemakers are blessed. You Americans should go back into the feudal age to learn that war isn't profitable and its pointless.
2 :
Way to much to read..But I'm taking care of myself just fine.
3 :
SG, Our Constitution has one flaw. One that the makers of it could not have foreseen. While it is arguably the one of the greatest documents on the planet, this minor flaw, a single word, causes us a great deal of grief. The flaw, just one word-"person" instead of "citizen." Consider the difference. What people in other countries do not understand, is that in all our wars, we have never asked for any land, except for that used to bury our dead in those countries. France, Belgium, Germany have much land that is cemeteries. For this, we are called "imperialists." I hope that we are not burying anyone in the Middle East. Senator, who answered before I did had an interesting statement, to quote his answer: [You stupid Americans call other states the "threat" or the "threat to world peace" when you people are the real threat that puts unlimited funds into weapons and war. You use weapons and created more hatred of others for you. ] It is not US soldiers who are carrying AK-47's and shooting people all over the world with them. US soldiers are not kidnapping and raping and terrorizing all over the world. US soldiers are not blowing up themselves in crowded markets or beside schools. US soldiers are not setting off car bombs, killing people and maiming people, either. It is followers of Islam that are doing this. Most followers of Islam are peaceful. It is the ones that are not peaceful, the extremists that are causing the problem and killing people. Senator, why do you not decry them? Why blame Americans? Maybe you should read about the Barbary Pirates, among other things. What kind of fools are we? Hard to tell. We do have the best standard of living of any large country in the world. We have a free society. We have accomplished a lot, and we have more to do. We are the place that everyone seems to want to come to, for whatever reason, and it has been that way for many years. Yet, we are called warmongers and imperialists. Sticks and stones, to me. When I see people on the news burning US flags and shouting "Death to America!" I see a target, because these, to me, are either terrorists, or terrorists to be. I wish I knew why they shout this. What have we done to them. What have I done to them? If these shouters come here, they are protected by our Constitution, because they are "persons," not citizens, dammit. Regards, Dan
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)