Nations go to war to win, not to lose. They develop the know-how to win, like we did when we developed the a - bomb to defeat Japan, which we did, saving 1 million yank lives. Billions were spent to develop the bomb and create a nuclear arsenal to protect ourselves and the free world. It worked. Those kamikaze-minded suiciders quit after two nukes showed them who’s who. Now islam is going after us the same way, killing, to date more than 4000 yanks as they perpetrate suicide bombings. We possess nuclear arms; our enemies do not, at least not yet. Yet they behead us, kill us, mutilate our dead bodies ,drag them thru the streets of their cities, threaten us if we bomb their so called "holy cities", and subject us to humiliation for “abusing†the terrorists we have captured as if we were supposed to coddle them instead. As this goes on we huddle in fear of what terrorists will do next. So what do we do? The unelected U.S. Supreme Court gives them “terrorists rights†to sue in our courts while “back home†they behead us. And we prosecute our own soldiers for not coddling them.’ REAL SMART, isn’t it? But this isn’t the start of this insanity - We could have won in Korea with nukes, but the liberals, panicking the administration, claimed Russia and China would nuke us if we nuked korea. the result: nukes sat idle, the war was a stalemate, 33,000 yanks died and now korea has come back with its own nukes, threatening us which wouldn’t have happened had we nuked them back then. Real smart. We could have won in Vietnam, but the liberals claimed nukes weren’t nice because too many of our enemy should die. the result: we lost the war, and 59,000 yanks died, instead. Real smart. We went to war in Iraq in 1990, but pulled out when it was half over, leaving the regime in power. The result: another war had to be begun all over, which we thought we won. but yanks die daily while nukes sit idle. Some victory we “wonâ€. Real smart Now we are led blindly down the path to believe moslem nations such as Pakistan will assist us in rooting out alqueda. Al queda is paying everyone off to be on their side. Even if they weren’t, moslems wouldn’t act for us. Pakistan has nukes, supplied with red mercury and technology by the Russian mafia. And do you think al queda has no access to their nukes? Allied with Pakistan? Real smart. Hw long will this “pearl harbor – 9/11 mentality†of sitting back, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating, persist? Must we wait until they blow us up, kill our children, brothers, sisters and parents one by one before we finally realize that we are justified in totally annihilating them and ending their threat for once and for all? In the meantime bandit and terrorist nations are clamoring to build nukes. Who do you think they will use them against, Monaco? Do you think these kamikaze minded maniacs will consider fallout or any similar considerations when they can and will nuke us, to make them hesitate to nuke? The liberals show photos of burnt Jap children to move us not to nuke. But what will our children look like if they nuke us? Do we have to await a third Pearl Harbor-9/11 before our sense of self-preservation and the preservation of our posterity is awakened and we excise the malignancy of islam from the face and body of mankind for once and for all? Must we apologize to them and coddle these terrorists and excuse ourselves for conducting war? And must they get rights to sue in our courts while they behead us? Did we spend those billions for marching down Main St. on the fourth of July, while yanks die daily and the arsenal sits idle or was there a more appropriate purpose to build the nuclear arsenal and protect ourselves? How long must we keep on huddling in fear and worry of what they will do to us next, when nukes sit idle? MUST WE WAIT UNTIL THEY NUKE US BEFORE WE WAKE UP? What kind of fools are we?
History - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
We're not fools enough to tell the difference between a question and a rant.
2 :
Uhhhh, what? Please relax.The world is going to be here when you wake up tomorrow. Have some warm milk or an Ambien and go to bed.
3 :
Are you comparing Pearl Harbor and 9/11 here. I wouldn't say we sat around, doing nothing decisive and procrastinating. We fought a just and decisive war. I agree that we should actively pursue Al Queda and those that harbor them. But Al Queda is not a sovereign nation with territory we can invade so it's difficult to nuke them without risking war. I believe the situation calls for a little more tact than you or the current administration are calling for. Perhaps it is best left to the CIA, MI6, and black ops but of course we cannot allow state sponsored assassination. I don't believe the policy of invading countries where we suspect Al Queda activity is working very well. Afghanistan yes, we knew they were there, Iraq certainly not. We don't have troops for future ventures and our presence seems to irritate people. We need a better plan.
4 :
The purpose of the war in Iraq was to get rid of Saddam Husseuins' regime, which it did. it was not a war against the whole of iraq, which makes it a rather more complex affair than the war with Japan. The civil war that has erupted in Iraq is a terrible thing, but America is not at war with the whole country, or at least isn't supposed to be, so you can't start nuking them. The American and British forces in iraq are supoposed to be supportin the current Iraqui government, so how on earth can they start nuking Iraq without killing their allies a swell as their enemies?
